Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

[Dark Eldar] Raiders pdf DRAFTs

 Post subject: [Dark Eldar] Raiders pdf DRAFTs
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 5:23 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
Please take some time to review the documents we link to.  These are NOT the final supplement downloads but they are pretty darn close.  I understand that we are almost 5 months behind our original deadline but we're doing our best to get everything wrapped up.  Almost everything is done - we're just formatting and it is a monster job.

Latest Dark Eldar List (Official 1.5 version) is here.

Warning! Big file. The list should be free of formatting, spelling, grammatical, and other errors.  If it is not please nitpick and post here any problems that you see. (Ex. I already see the white box underneath the special rules - it will be fixed in Raiders).

There are many changes to 1.5 from the draft posted earlier in December.  This version is very close to how it will appear in Epic: Raiders, save for small things like the page numbers, reference numbers, etc.





_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Dark Eldar] Raiders pdf DRAFTs
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 5:34 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
Januar 17th? Hey it's my birhtday! Thanks in advance for your present :D

On a quick glance it looks very good :)

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Dark Eldar] Raiders pdf DRAFTs
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:32 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
I should point out that Chroma was the man behind the new look.  I literally couldn't have done it without him.  He helped put the army list in a format that IMO is easier to understand and easier on the eyes.

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Dark Eldar] Raiders pdf DRAFTs
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:46 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 2084
Location: Reading, England
Typos.  

Talos
has a ssault weapon, missing the first A, and has an armour save of +.

perditor
stat line is off set by a taabs worth of indent or so.

Vessel of pain
discriptive text.  Second paragraph second sentance. says pain vessel, should it be vessel of pain?

barrage of pleasue, vessel of pain, tormentor titan and  Kashnarak beast
firefight ofset to the right by one indent

kashnarak beast and raven fighter
first weapons profile except name ofset to the right by one indent


That is all I could find.

I haven't read the fluff yet, but it looks like a very nice list.  Weldone.

_________________
Tyranid air marshal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Dark Eldar] Raiders pdf DRAFTs
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:10 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
My own catch:
In army list transport section it should read "may choose from the following list."
------
Hena,

The transport rule says you should have "no extra spaces if possible".  There are situations when you can have an open transport spot, however.  Ex. A Wych formation of 4 units with a Slavebringer Assault boat.  You would have 4 extra slots with no way to fill them.  Because of this it needs to read the way it does.

Free Planetfall.  Neal made mention that it will most likely be in the next set of rules and I'm going on faith that it will be there.  I may kick myself in the butt for it later (along with Support Craft for that matter) but....

Everything else - great points.  That is exactly what I'm looking for.  Continue to nitpick away.  I'd rather deal with it now than later.  

FYI I am re-doing many of the pics, including the Tormentor and the Executor.  Most likely I'll be putting Charad's models in there and cleaning up all the images so they look like the Grotesque, Mandrake, and Incubi datafax pictures.  Removing the background from the datafax images will put the focus squarely on the models themselves.

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Dark Eldar] Raiders pdf DRAFTs
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:12 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 8:59 pm
Posts: 1212
Location: Finland
-Few stats are of line
-scourges can have reavers but not scourges?
- no slavebringer to talos?
-were are special rules?
-webway portal in text is shifted to wraithgate

I'll check list more carefully tomorrow.

_________________
Rats Keep Running...

Dark Eldar Dracon


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Dark Eldar] Raiders pdf DRAFTs
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:45 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:39 pm
Posts: 69
Location: devon
First thing that comes to mind is that the No garrison special rule should be with the rest of the special rules near the front (or the other way around possibly :) )

As noted before the Talos entry has armour '+' and scourges have no small arms weapons and cant have extra scourges in the army list (only reavers)

Pain Vessels managed to cut through stone and metal


Alter to Vessels of Pain or simply Vessels? Sounds wrong somehow (sorry, nitpicking ;) )


Unable to create it and with few opportunities to steal it, this psychic material became such a rare commodity to the Dark Eldar that they would do almost
anything to obtain it...

I really, Really, Love this idea. It gives them an excellent reason for war besides slaves, in fact I really like the entire background piece.

The Army list includes a 'Raider' upgrade but this is both unnecessary (as all transportable units say they have them anyway) and isnt an option for any of the units on the list.

I'm working on putting up a pic heavy Raider WIP on the blog now. Should be up soon.

I really want to convert up an Asdrubael Vect Ravager now...





_________________
Peace? Peace is only achievable through Extermination!

ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NL9G0K26-0k


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Dark Eldar] Raiders pdf DRAFTs
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:04 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
No apologies are needed. ?I WANT nitpicking. ?Anyone who doesn't like criticism shouldn't make an army list. :)
Unable to create it and with few opportunities to steal it, this psychic material became such a rare commodity to the Dark Eldar that they would do almost
anything to obtain it...

I really, Really, Love this idea. It gives them an excellent reason for war besides slaves, in fact I really like the entire background piece.

Wait till you read the story. ?Not to give anything away, but this is the catalyst for the fiction.





_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Dark Eldar] Raiders pdf DRAFTs
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:58 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:39 pm
Posts: 69
Location: devon
Looking forward to it :) Sent you some pics and theres a new Batrep up :)

_________________
Peace? Peace is only achievable through Extermination!

ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NL9G0K26-0k


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Dark Eldar] Raiders pdf DRAFTs
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 4:18 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada

(tarrisvaal @ Jan. 03 2008,21:45)
QUOTE
First thing that comes to mind is that the No garrison special rule should be with the rest of the special rules near the front (or the other way around possibly :) )

Actually, since "garrisoning" is a Tournament Scenario special rule (that is also used in some other scenarios), the "No garrisons" special rule is supposed to go with the army list, the Biel-Tan Eldar list does the exact same thing.

In non-Tournament scenarios, Dark Eldar *could* garrison, if the scenario allowed it.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Dark Eldar] Raiders pdf DRAFTs
PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:11 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:56 pm
Posts: 7
Location: france
hello

Slavebringer have no CC nor FF value, is it normal?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Dark Eldar] Raiders pdf DRAFTs
PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:20 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
No, it is a typo. ?It is fixed in the final draft. ?Thanks for keeping an eye out for these things though and feel free to post more questions or concerns. ?Sometimes it is difficult to see the forest through the trees. :)

EDIT: To actually answer your question... CC 6+ and FF 5+.  I'm going to go get some coffee now. :blush:





_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Dark Eldar] Raiders pdf DRAFTs
PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 6:30 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
Top of the thread has the most updated Dark Eldar version.  The official 1.5 differs considerably from the draft posted earlier, but that is what drafts are for.  

Feel free to make comments on the document itself here.  If there are any issues with the Dark Eldar list, let's bring it to a different thread.

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net