Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
Cost of AMHC http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=9639 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Cost of AMHC |
Well they are my first choice - skimmer makes up for RA in a big way for me. I feel they are by far the best medium tank int he game - epics t-34 as it were. |
Author: | Dobbsy [ Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Cost of AMHC |
So are the Hammerheads too cheap? No. This isn't about removing the AMHC, but consideration about it's cost. We can assume that the IG has Commissar in there, which gives Vanquisher Fearless, Inspiring and Leader Plus if you remove the drones(why are they even included in that equation? It's no real comparison if you are including upgrades...) you're looking at 8 non-RA vehicles for 500 as opposed to 10 RA vehicles for 650 with a free upgrade... while some people may think skimmer makes up for RA, it doesn't. Skimmers can only hide for so long. Once they get caught in range, they don't stand up as well as the 10 RA vehicles. Try taking on that same IG tank company with the AMHC. I'm betting I know which formation comes out on top... Also, 65 points for a LR = 62.5 for a HH. It's not that big a difference already. |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Cost of AMHC |
75cm range is a big advantage, only the IG battle tanks can strike out as far without doubling. |
Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Cost of AMHC |
Yes the range and skimmer is a great combo - plus the LR biggest weaknesses are crossfire and close assault. Skimmer means you are immune and the speed of the tank is fantastic (helping avoid crossfire and fight assaults defensively etc). I would take them over russ any day of the week - for teh speed, the weapons and skimmer. |
Author: | Dobbsy [ Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Cost of AMHC |
So HHs can't be crossfired? I must remember that in my next game ![]() 300 points for 6 Falcons (using suggested Sword of Vaul updates) 375 for 6 Hammerheads So, falcons are faster, slightly less armoured, their range is shorter but they fire twice with their main weapon, they can take troops to a FF for which they themselves get a 4+ FF oh, and you conveniently forget Hit and Run which is quite a boost to their survivability and which also must be taken into account when costing the Falcon. So Falcon 50 points vs HH 62.5 per vehicle. Sure there are ways to counter it (for example overwatch, indirect weapons, aircrafts), but it's still very nasty. I think you have partly answered your own question here Hena. Skimmer isn't the game winner you seem to think under the new Skimmer rules either. Smart opponents can utilise terrain to their advantage now. And skimmer means nothing when your opponent can FF you off the table (which has happened to me a few times) - eventually you have to manouvre about the table and bring your formation into some form of attack range. You can't possibly say that Skimmer is better than 4+ RA, Hena. Look, if CS wants to up their cost I can't do anything about it. I've said my piece. |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Cost of AMHC |
There is no way the cost of Hammerheads should come down, they're already very very powerful. |
Author: | Jstr19 [ Sun Jun 17, 2007 1:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Cost of AMHC |
I'm not convinced that HH need a points rise. they seem appropriately priced at the moment as they are pretty fragile against return fire. my usual opponent is well aware of how brutal they can be and goes gunning for them. |
Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Cost of AMHC |
Who are your usual opponents and how many formations do you take (3 I find is a good number for an armour heavy force, 1 ion the other two rail - course this was when ions were flak). |
Author: | Jstr19 [ Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Cost of AMHC |
I normally try and balance the army with a good mix of armour and infantry. Using Broadsides to deal with enemy armour and a 6 strong HH formation that is usually give an infantry support role with 6 Ion Cannons. |
Author: | Dobbsy [ Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Cost of AMHC |
I see and take pretty much the same thing as you jstr19. I usually go with 1 AMHC with 8 railguns and 1 with 6 Ion cannons then fill in the rest of the army with other gear like troops and aircraft. Even with 8 they take a pounding most games as they are BTS. There is no way the cost of Hammerheads should come down, they're already very very powerful I'm not sure who is calling for this E&C.... I'm certainly not. |
Author: | thurse [ Mon Jun 18, 2007 10:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Cost of AMHC |
Hi! 1) When you compare HH with falcons, you omit the versatility of the tau tank. Falcons are great against armoured vehicules but not against infantry. HH are very efficient against both. Furthermore the indirect fire possibility is an important "plus" 2) I like to field 2 formations of 6 ionheads. Compared to railheads, they have - twice the AP firepower on every order - the same AT firepower on advance, better on sutain, worese on double. The difference in range is not negligible, but the gain in firepower is too much. 3) On the loss of AA for ionheads, the new scorpionship does more than compensating... But it's not the subject |
Author: | Lion in the Stars [ Sat Jun 30, 2007 5:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Cost of AMHC |
well, 2 AHMCs plus Network Drones for each are 700, versus 650 for the LRuss company. I'd much rather have the 2 AHMC (lets me split fire if I need to, or really murder one target with or without using Co-Fire). As much as I really don't like the idea of losing some speed (that's a bigger change than some seem to realize), I think that the hammerheads are too attractive in comparison to a FW cadre, so could probably stand a points increase to 400 for the bare cadre. Just a quick question, does anyone NOT take an AHMC with the Networked Drones? |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |