 
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 2 posts ] |
|
Shark, shark, who's got the shark |
|
Honda
|
Post subject: Shark, shark, who's got the shark  Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 4:21 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
 |
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 11:44 pm
Posts: 1891
Location: Katy, Republic of Texas
|
|
In line with some of the "gun" discussions that have been going on and seeing an opportunity to simplify an entry, I thought I'd toss this out for others to consider.
Premise: A Hammerhead is called a Hammerhead regardless of what type of gun it carries. Same for the proposed Moray.
Given that and using IA3 as sort of the inspiration, drop the Whiteshark and give the Tigershark two weapons options?
Then instead of trying to figure out costs for a similar vehicle with different capabilities, we just allow a Tigershark to take either IC+drones or the [macro-macho]* rail cannon.
Thoughts?
* Sorry, that was about as technical a term as I felt like coming up with at this hour.
_________________
Honda
"Remember Taros? We do"
- 23rd Elysian Drop Regiment
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Tactica
|
Post subject: Shark, shark, who's got the shark Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 5:22 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
|
|
As FW has made a precident in FW:IA3:TC, the suggestion has merit.
Points however may or may not be the same for the alternate arsenol in the end. Playtesting will have to determine.
_________________
Rob
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 2 posts ] |
|
