Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
Supremacy Armour http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=30278 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | Stormwind [ Fri Sep 18, 2015 11:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Supremacy Armour |
http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/en-US/Tau-K ... acy-Armour I of all people usually advocate against following what is happening in 28mm scale, but I have been waiting years for GW to finally admit that Tau deserve titans and I'm glad that this appeared. =-P |
Author: | Corran_dk [ Fri Sep 18, 2015 11:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Supremacy Armour |
Stormwind wrote: http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/en-US/Tau-KX139-Ta'unar-Supremacy-Armour I of all people usually advocate against following what is happening in 28mm scale, but I have been waiting years for GW to finally admit that Tau deserve titans and I'm glad that this appeared. =-P Yes yes yes yes! We need it ![]() ![]() |
Author: | moredakka [ Fri Sep 18, 2015 12:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Supremacy Armour |
I don't think it has enough guns on it. ![]() |
Author: | Apocolocyntosis [ Fri Sep 18, 2015 12:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Supremacy Armour |
so what you're saying moredakka, is that it needs more dakka? |
Author: | carlos [ Fri Sep 18, 2015 12:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Supremacy Armour |
Looks like a parody of the 40k ethos of more dakka. |
Author: | Ulrik [ Fri Sep 18, 2015 1:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Supremacy Armour |
Meh. :-/ I really liked the brief that Tau didn't use big Walkers. A reverse of the Imperium way of big Walkers, small tanks. |
Author: | moredakka [ Fri Sep 18, 2015 2:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Supremacy Armour |
Apocolocyntosis wrote: so what you're saying moredakka, is that it needs more dakka? Exactly mate. ![]() |
Author: | Dave [ Fri Sep 18, 2015 3:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Supremacy Armour |
Holy crap that's cool. Makes me think of a Destroid Monster or Stone Rhino. |
Author: | Apocolocyntosis [ Fri Sep 18, 2015 4:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Supremacy Armour |
if the tau designed it to be a static defence, why is it a massive upright self propelled walking mecha? On another note: old style figures/numerals with full caps. Casuals. (that typeface only has old style, still FW/GW fault for choosing it take that back, it does have lining figure, they just arn't using them) |
Author: | MikeT [ Fri Sep 18, 2015 5:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Supremacy Armour |
Well, at least it's not quite as incredibly idiotic looking as ![]() Not saying much though. |
Author: | Stormwind [ Fri Sep 18, 2015 6:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Supremacy Armour |
Wait, what on Earth is that thing? |
Author: | Dave [ Fri Sep 18, 2015 7:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Supremacy Armour |
lol Looks like someone combined a Catapult and a Hollander. |
Author: | Kyrt [ Fri Sep 18, 2015 11:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Supremacy Armour |
Not terrible, but it's a shame they didn't take the opportunity to do something different with Tau. Rather than a transformer... |
Author: | Aeri [ Sat Sep 19, 2015 7:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Supremacy Armour |
Dave wrote: lol Looks like someone combined a Catapult and a Hollander. I'd say a Catapult and a New Holland... ![]() |
Author: | Largo_W [ Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Supremacy Armour |
Wait, where have I seen that style of Titan before? ![]() |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |