MikeT wrote:
Onyx wrote:
Believe me, I'm WELL AWARE of how Tau play in Epic Armageddon

.
Have a look at the Tau forum over previous years for more information there.
And that should actually read "Tau (at epic scale) aren't fond of
close combat".
But anyway, no point in discussing this again as the 6.4 list is pretty much finished as zombocm mentioned.
No, they're not fond of engagements, as in, the engage action. On your second point, of course there's a point in discussing it, not least of which is a possible variant list.
You're right, the present Epic Armageddon army list states that Tau don't like to do Engagements.
Of course, since an Engagement in Epic is (more or less) meant to represent a whole game of W40K, Tau at Epic scale should actually be
very good at FF (whilst being rubbish at CC). The whole
Tau don't like Engagements thing is merely a game related interpretation to help make the Tau different from other races (particularly the Eldar).
Tau don't like to waste resources (unless it's leaving Kroot behind to delay an advancing enemy - it's for the greater good and all...

). Committing to an Engagement is not a waste of resources. Getting into hand to hand combat with a superior foe is. Shooting the foe to pieces with a Pulse Rifle or Railgun (at FF range) is a perfect use of resources and fully backed up by pretty much all available Tau fluff (of which I have read almost all of it).
Tau are not afraid to assault an important defended position or to set up a firebase to hold a key area.
I'd take Vespids at 4+ FF for sure but just about anyone who knows about the Tau in 40K (or has read the fluff) might find the numbers a bit odd...
Do Vespids deserve a higher FF value than a Crisis Suit?
I'd like to see a Tau armour list developed one day as I still have several models to use as Moray gunships.
Mark_Logue and I experimented with using Remora Drones as airborne Marker Lights a few years ago. It was an interesting situation but might have been a bit unbalanced.