| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| E&C's Tau Proposal - Devilfish hull speed http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=16551 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | E&C's Tau Proposal - Devilfish hull speed |
Hammerheads, Devilfish, Skyrays, all Devilfish-hulled vehicles. What should their speed be in my proposal? |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | E&C's Tau Proposal - Devilfish hull speed |
I voted to increase them back to 30cm speed, as I see the Tau as an army of fluid movement etc. plus giving Fire Warriors a higher effective speed (due to Skimmers) than mech. IG seems appropriate. |
|
| Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | E&C's Tau Proposal - Devilfish hull speed |
Devilfish at 30cm, heavier options at 25cm. Both faster than guard (well, skimmer gives edge over chimera), adds in a consideration over whether to always add a skyray to a firewarrior formation. faster they are, more points they are, smaller formation size/activation count gets etc. |
|
| Author: | Pulsar [ Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | E&C's Tau Proposal - Devilfish hull speed |
I voted for Make some 30cm speed, and keep some at 25cm speed. I think devilfish transports should be 30cm speed but i'm not so sure that Hammerheads and the other ones with heavier weapons should be as fast. |
|
| Author: | zombocom [ Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | E&C's Tau Proposal - Devilfish hull speed |
Devilfish + Skyrays 30cm, Hammerheads 25cm. |
|
| Author: | Chroma [ Wed Aug 26, 2009 5:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | E&C's Tau Proposal - Devilfish hull speed |
Quote: (Hena @ 26 Aug. 2009, 17:35 ) Hammerheads, Devilfish and Skyray should be 30cm. Stingray should be 25cm. Why limit the Stingray at all then? |
|
| Author: | Chroma [ Wed Aug 26, 2009 5:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | E&C's Tau Proposal - Devilfish hull speed |
Quote: (Hena @ 26 Aug. 2009, 17:48 ) Why limit the Stingray at all then?[/quote] Balance reasons. Could you elaborate on that? Why would a single Hammerhead/Devilfish hull move at 25cm while all the rest would move at 30cm? If anything, all the "big shooty" ones should be slower, what singles out the Stingray? |
|
| Author: | BlackLegion [ Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | E&C's Tau Proposal - Devilfish hull speed |
Devilfish 30cm all other variants 25cm. |
|
| Author: | Chroma [ Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | E&C's Tau Proposal - Devilfish hull speed |
Quote: (BlackLegion @ 26 Aug. 2009, 18:26 ) Devilfish 30cm all other variants 25cm. I'd agree with this as well. |
|
| Author: | Lion in the Stars [ Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | E&C's Tau Proposal - Devilfish hull speed |
Agreed, Devilfish @30cm, all others @25cm. If a RHINO is 30cm move, there's no reason for a skimmer to be much slower! |
|
| Author: | asaura [ Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | E&C's Tau Proposal - Devilfish hull speed |
Quote: (Lion in the Stars @ 26 Aug. 2009, 20:30 ) If a RHINO is 30cm move, there's no reason for a skimmer to be much slower! Sure there can be. We might want to nerf the DF+FW countercharge to 5+5 cm. We might want to nerf the movement of mech. tau because they have such a good shooting attack. (I voted 30cm for DF, 25 maybe for HH. Still, the above reasonings can be used if we want to use them.) |
|
| Author: | Dobbsy [ Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | E&C's Tau Proposal - Devilfish hull speed |
I voted 30cm all. Why make life difficult to remember which hull goes what speed? I don't want to have to keep looking up speeds during a game thanks. Keep it simple please. 30cm isn't broken - earlier renditions of the list proved that to me. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|