Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Firewarriors

 Post subject: Firewarriors
PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:39 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 916
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Sorry not very explicit.  I meant 2 pulse rifle shots rather than one pulse rifle and one pulse carbine.  The low FF makes sense which is good as I'd rather they didn't increase their FF.

I would need a 40K expert to tell us what the ratio of carbines to rifles the FWs "normally" have.  But my understanding was they have a mix.

I also tend to think it gives them a nice alternative to assaulting with the carbines disrupt punch.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Firewarriors
PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:58 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
Cw,

I hate to admit it - but the reality is carbines are not favored at all in 40K.

Historically, FW could take either all pulse rifles or you can take 50% of carbines with the remainder being pulse rifles.

Pulse Rifles were 30" S5 Rapid Fire
  single shot at 30" if you don't move
  2 shots at 12" if you do or don't move
  may not assault if you fire two shots

Pulse Carbines were 18" S5 Assault, Pinning
  single shot all the time
  caused pinning tests if it wounded the enemy

So in sheer damage potential, the pulse rifle won at the 0-12" range as you got two shots a trooper, and it won at the >18" - 30" range as the pulse carbine could not fire at this distance.

So the Pulse Carbine had a sweet spot of >12" - 18" range because both weapons delivered a single shot at this range, but the Carbine gave you a chance to pin the enemy.

If you were at any other range, you wanted a Pulse Rifle.

Therefore, no meaningful tourny player would be caught DEAD with a carbine FW.

Now in the new rules coming out this month, the FW unit can now take Pulse Carbines on the entire unit - my first thought of this was... :/

However, when you consider how Markerlights work in 40K in the new codex, they are much, MUCH *MUCH* better than they used to be.

The Markerlight itself can now be used to in a host of ways. First - it will have the same old ability to grant ANY weapon in the Tau army a 2+ to hit the target unit once thier marked... not to mention a whole host of other things like firing seeker missiles on 2+ to hit and what not... but it will have a bunch of new abilities.

One of the new Markerlight abilities will be to cause pinning tests and can stack negative modifiers when an enemy unit takes fire... so that same old pile of @#$% carbine from old, now can fire and cause a pinning test - but if the unit was marked three times - they would be at -3 to their Leadership to see if they were successful. That can have HUGE impacts on enemy fire units sticking around.

The new codex therefore may change what weapons are valued in a very fundamental way.

Cheers,

I am 40K. :p

_________________
Rob


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Firewarriors
PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:22 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 916
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Lol, when I said "a 40K expert" I was betting that you would step in :)

So thinking out loud, we could interpret that the two shots the Tau get are actually the rifles shooting twice at the closer range, and the odd carbine here and there adds the disrupt.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Firewarriors
PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 7:39 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
LOL - I read between the lines Cw! :/

Seriously, regarding the carbines - makes sense.

I think the original basis was probably much simpler. Its been too long ago and I don't recall the exact thought process on this one... I suspect it was something like - a player can take 50/50 in a squad - so lets give them one of each shot since they can't fight in combat and don't have AT fire in E:A... well, something like that.

Tis all speculation though as I really don't remember the thought process on this one. Archive has shorted out... :p

Cheers,

_________________
Rob


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net