Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 141 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10  Next

The Jetpack rule is 'broken'

 Post subject: The Jetpack rule is 'broken'
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 12:25 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
Well technically the jump back solution E&C proposed is also a way of avoiding assaults.  They use it to fire in range at the enemy and then jump back to keep out of assaulting range.  They just do it during their own turn.  Both ideas work, but (on paper anyway) this appears to be simpler and less cheesy.

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: The Jetpack rule is 'broken'
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:43 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada

(Evil and Chaos @ Oct. 31 2007,11:12)
QUOTE
I was making a point about your use of generalisations Hena.

You can't generalize about Hena's generalizations, E&C, that would be a major mistake.  You may suffer some form of corporal punishment if your don't take such discussions private... it's the most admirable way of doing things.

.
.
.

:D

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: The Jetpack rule is 'broken'
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:51 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Only take my left arm... I need the right one for painting!

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: The Jetpack rule is 'broken'
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:48 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
The 40K Jet Pack mechanics are mostly irrelevant with respect to Epic mechanics.  The scale on which the 40K rules work barely shows up in Epic.  it's nice if you can take them into account but they can also be jettisoned freely if necessary.

There are several proposals for Jet Packs that could be workable - the current rules, this 10cm move, or allowing them to force FF (or just always allow the Tau units to force FF).  The real question is what is in keeping with the background and also makes for the best game experience.

Personally, I like the idea of letting Tau Jet Pack units always use their FF value when attacked, to represent a short-range firing retreat as the enemy closes to base contact.  It's pretty simple and in keeping with both background and an epic scale representation of the 40K mechanics.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: The Jetpack rule is 'broken'
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:25 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
That isn't bad either, Neal.  It would also get rid of another special rule because you can just apply skimmer to the jump pack troops and be done with it.  Voila! A special rule eliminated and a problem solved.

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: The Jetpack rule is 'broken'
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:40 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
Skimmer would be THE solution if you think that the move-shoot-move of the WH40k rules are on a too small scale as to be allowed in Epic.

But then this would allow pop-up attacks. Something that Crisis suits can't do in Wh40k. But it would be a minor change to disallow this in the units notes.

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: The Jetpack rule is 'broken'
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 4:28 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
There are shades of the idea.

1) Make them Skimmer  (pop-ups throw a monkey wrench).
2) Only give the Jetpacks the force-FF ability, not full skimmer.
3) Only let the Tau use their FF.  The enemy would still eventually close, allowing them to CC (could be fiddly)
*) Optionally for the second and third versions, make it only work on the defense.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: The Jetpack rule is 'broken'
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 4:58 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:45 pm
Posts: 8139
Location: London
Option 2 I guess would be skimmer ability and a note on the unit no pop ups?

Or is a note about FF less words?

_________________
If using E-Bay use this link to support Tac Com!
'Abolish red trousers?! Never! Red trousers are France!' – Eugene Etienne, War Minister, 1913
"Gentlemen, we may not make history tomorrow, but we shall certainly change the geography."
General Plumer, 191x


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: The Jetpack rule is 'broken'
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:01 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Notes: Skimmer (May not pop-up).

OR:

Notes: May always choose to Firefight when fighting an Enagement.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: The Jetpack rule is 'broken'
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:06 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
I'm for:
Notes: May always choose to Firefight when fighting an Engagement.

Because Tau Jetpacks don't allow ignoring terrain on the move.

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: The Jetpack rule is 'broken'
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:09 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
With: " May always choose to Firefight when fighting an Engagement." the Tau Jetpack-unit can always choose to FF but the enemy unit in base contact can use CC.

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: The Jetpack rule is 'broken'
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:10 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire

(Hena @ Oct. 31 2007,16:07)
QUOTE
The problem with forcing FF is that then it makes Tau almost completely impossible to engage in close combat. They have already huge amount of skimmers. With this a large amount of infantry is protected from CC as well. This would be too good.

That's one reason I prefer the 10cm post-shot move. :)

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: The Jetpack rule is 'broken'
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:15 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:45 pm
Posts: 8139
Location: London
Interesting point BL, would that be what people want though?

_________________
If using E-Bay use this link to support Tac Com!
'Abolish red trousers?! Never! Red trousers are France!' – Eugene Etienne, War Minister, 1913
"Gentlemen, we may not make history tomorrow, but we shall certainly change the geography."
General Plumer, 191x


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: The Jetpack rule is 'broken'
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:24 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
There are many who would argue the current jet pack rule already makes it near impossible to CC the those Tau units.

I'm fine with any of the proposed changes. ?The line note of choosing a FF sounds like the simplest solution as it will avoid all the confusion a skimmer notation would undoubtedly bring.

EDIT I am fine with the FF idea either via skimmer notation, modified skimmer notation, or just a notation.  I'm also fine with E&C's idea.  The CC thing seems out of sorts, however.





_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 141 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net