kyussinchains wrote:
I think that broadly you could use whatever models and units you like from both this and the 3rd sphere list and it would play okay and be roughly balanced, I suggest that unless you are a hardcore tournament player you consider doing just that with your opponents, you could also consider using the old version written by Matt shadowlord if you like it, it's
still available if you and your opponents want to continue using it, it's also still archived on armyforge, so you could easily fork it off into your own branch and have an army builder for it too

The remit of NetEA list development is to create tournament ready lists with variant playstyles and units, not to shoehorn everything into one list, I am sorry you dislike the direction the Vior'la is going in, but I am also absolutely sure that if you suggest good ideas for the list, that Gunslinger007 will take them into consideration because he's committed to an open and inclusive development process
For my money the original Vior'la list should not have started off at Developmental stage because frankly it wasn't developmental and it meant a lot of people felt secure in building a collection around it when they shouldn't have
The 3rd sphere list isn't that lacklustre it just doesn't have the battlesuits (which a friendly opponent would probably have zero issue with you using), and with the manta about to get a shot in the arm, should be a perfect home for your recent acquisitions

Well, I don't - respectfully - see where I said I wanted everything shoehorned in. I reacted to stuff being taken out.
Also when I said the 3rd Sphere list was lackluster it was mainly due to it being sub-par to most lists balance-wise and not very competitive at all.
gunslinger007 wrote:
@Draccan
- I'm glad you're so interested in the Tau in general, especially the Vior'la as we work on them. I'm not sure Mantas will make the Vior'la tournament list, but I think some of the new changes for the Manta will make it more desirable for the Third Sphere list. And of course, feel free to sample from both for casual play!
- I'm sorry some of the adjustments have thrown you off. Unfortunately, as a list still being worked on and refined, changes in stats and build might be necessary. However, it does seem like a crisis formation will be reintroduced along with the possibility of hammerheads as upgrades for fire warriors.
- at the moment, I do think the heavy suits will be staying out of the core. I havent seen fluff indicating the Vior'la sept had especially high rates of heavy suit usage, as opposed to their high usage of fws and Pfs, so I do want to try and have the list reflect that. I don't believe the list should be able to run as all heavy suits.
- since it seems you're a bit discouraged with the list, what are the top three components you'd like to see in a new Vior'la list? I can't promise they'll all make it, but I do want to see what people who are passionate about the list are looking for
- regarding upgrading the 3rd Sphere List, Kyuss beat me to it. NetEA doesn't have habit of going back and upgrading old approved lists with new units GW creates. Rather new lists are created that can incorporate the new units and offer new play styles for the community. You can see it with Marines, "Newcrons", and Tyranids to name a few.
I hope you'll stay interested with this list! While I think calling the 3rd Sphere list lackluster is a bit harsh, I know there is a demand to get a new variety of units on the table and all help is appreciated.
A lot to unpack and comment on. Let me try.
Fluff. I see the word thrown around on TaccComm a lot, but rarely specific references. I have searched in my old codices yesterday and on the Interwebz but not found much about Vior'la at all. Would love to know what sources were used. Call it the academic in me.
List design philosophy: I would love to see a couple of lines in writing about what is being tried with this list.
Mantas. I think the list can survive without the Manta. What I lack is a reason for taking it out. What was the thinking about it? For a supposedly fast moving, heavy-suit strike force I find it puzzling it is taken out. From a gaming perspective it is a great center-piece and in my opinion goes well with the heavy suits. Tau really only has that one thing going for them to have something Reaver/Warlord sized.
Crisis Suits. Good to hear they might find their way back in. Commander Farsight was Vior'la and it would be hard to imagine Crisis suits not to be intrinsic to a suit-heavy list.
General points: I find that with the current edition, that removes crisis suits, mantas, hammerheads etc. that the playstyle for the Vior'la list is going to be really limited and that most lists are going to be very much the same. Talking of shoehorn, I think a limited playstyle might be shoehorned in here.
I understand that the current philosophy of NetEA lists is to put in new stuff and remove other stuff to differentiate, but I think that this is going to far in the other direction.
Top things I would like to see in:
* Personally I think Crisis Suits are the most important for a supposedly mobile strike force. Esp. with the little I know of Vior'la.
* For me the best way to differentiate 3rd Sphere vs. alternate Tau list (currently called Vior'la) would be to change what the core formations are and how it is structured. A fun-factor is to have a bit more units in and only the absolute needed taken out. But differentiating core formations is a great way to not having to remove a lot of units but making the two seem different.
Off topic: This is not really a discussion for here, but I do feel that NetEA would have been better served by having two sets of lists for a faction: The limited, tested, close to original lists for competition and some catch-all big lists that doesn't try too hard to be competitive, just fix what is too broken and include new units as GW creates new ones. I think that in the long run it would be a lot more simple to handle. And require less play-testing.
But this is entirely me and I know that on TaccComm I am in the tiny minority with this.