Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

[Army List] Why no flexibility in upgrade sizes?

 Post subject: [Army List] Why no flexibility in upgrade sizes?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:46 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
I think the primary complaint about Tau upgrades is that there are so many of them as "line items", and that each formation has its own "sub-set" of what are allowed... that 'complexity' what was the problem.

I really don't think adding two Tetras instead of three Tetras to a formation is adding "complexity"; it's adding flexibility.

And Orks seem to do fine with near infinite numbers of upgrades.


Ah, there is where we disagree.  The complexity is being argued here and now, but the general argument against the 4.x Tau is that they were the army that could field anything in any amount in any way.  That is certainly a flexibility issue.

And Orks are balanced for what they have.  They have lousy iniatives which affects their activations, their rallies, and their shooting (indirectly because of the inclination to double).  

Space Marines are perhaps the most flexible army of them all, but their small sizes and average firepower (not to mention lack of MWs) keeps them from being a dominating force on the Epic board.  

Tau have a lot of things going for them.  My biggest complaint about army development in general is this desire to have your (not you specifically, Chroma - I mean all champs) army able to do everything and anything and how if you don't get your way the army will suffer on the board.

SO WHAT?  Who cares if it is difficult to win with?  We played the Dark Eldar for over a YEAR with stats that were gradually improved.  That whole time the DE won about 30-40% of their games (and I am being generous).  During their development I gave up a LOT of ideas that were really cool (combat drugs for instance) that would have most certainly added flavor to the game.  But I did so to smooth out the tournament list.

I'm not saying I'm perfect, just suggesting that mitigating the Tau's flexibility is a key ingredient to controlling their development.

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Army List] Why no flexibility in upgrade sizes?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:54 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 4:36 am
Posts: 207
Quote: (Moscovian @ 18 Mar. 2009, 16:46 )

I'm not saying I'm perfect, just suggesting that mitigating the Tau's flexibility is a key ingredient to controlling their development.

+1     :yes:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Army List] Why no flexibility in upgrade sizes?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:57 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote: (Moscovian @ 18 Mar. 2009, 16:46 )

Ah, there is where we disagree.  The complexity is being argued here and now, but the general argument against the 4.x Tau is that they were the army that could field anything in any amount in any way.  That is certainly a flexibility issue.

Who said anything about "anything in any amount"?

I'm asking that the Tau have the option to field *LESS* than they do now.  There would be the same "maximum" numbers as now, with the "up to three upgrades" limit... so, are you saying an opponent would be fine seeing four Gun Drone units added to a formation, but would find only two added overly complex?

Aren't Tau noted for thier "organizational flexibility"?

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Army List] Why no flexibility in upgrade sizes?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:09 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
It's the same argument against allowing the Biel-tan to have the 4-Aspect unit troupe formation.  It was ONE formation, but it added flexibility to the list that would only make min-maxing easier.

'Organizational flexibility' - this could mean a great many things.  Carried to an extreme, why not just price out the units individually and cap the total number of units per formation at twelve?  Just piece the formations together any darn way you feel like it.  It's flexible, very Tau-ish, simple to list.  Come up with an argument against it.

The obvious argument is that it affords too much flexibility which equates to the list being overpowered.

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Army List] Why no flexibility in upgrade sizes?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:24 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote: (Moscovian @ 18 Mar. 2009, 17:09 )

Come up with an argument against it.

Actually, I think that would be brilliant!

Would allow the Tau to be completely unique from the more "regimented" races.  Price things at slightly higher than they are now per unit and go.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Army List] Why no flexibility in upgrade sizes?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:35 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
Chroma, you exhaust me sometimes.  Don't you have something like five supplements that you are supposed to be working on?

While I think you COULD balance this type of list, it would trash all the work that came before and effectively reset everything back to zero.

Although this would be an interesting idea for variant lists for ALL races: set them up on a kind of salad bar and organize as you see fit.  Maybe we'll make ANOTHER supplement based on this idea!  :vD
We'll call it..

Epic: Buffet

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Army List] Why no flexibility in upgrade sizes?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:42 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote: (Moscovian @ 18 Mar. 2009, 17:35 )

Chroma, you exhaust me sometimes.

I drink a lot of coffee, take a lot of B-Complex, and I don't have any kids...  :laugh:

While I think you COULD balance this type of list, it would trash all the work that came before and effectively reset everything back to zero.


If any one army should have such a "buffet" style setup, it would be the Tau.

And it wouldn't trash anything but the one page of army list... all the unit stats seem pretty much on the money.

Since my brain is already working on it, I'll post this "variant army list" in the "Other Forces" area once I get it done... tonight.   :vD

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Army List] Why no flexibility in upgrade sizes?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:44 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
One last thing... it's very (minorly) frustrating that, playing pure Tau, there's only one (limited) 25 point upgrade, and *no* 50 point upgrades... I dislike having points left over.




_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Army List] Why no flexibility in upgrade sizes?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:59 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
The "buffet" armylist should be Space Marines :D

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Army List] Why no flexibility in upgrade sizes?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:05 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
Why not make the buffet for everyone though.  Seriously.  If you are going to do this, why not?  It would be the ultimate in customization.  Modify the tournament rules that state that there is a target number of activations (ex. 10 for 3000 points) and each player cannot have more than 12 or less than 8 (preventing popcorn armies from attacking).  

I think you'd get some pretty strange lists put together but it would be fun occasionally.  Anyway, I've taken it way off topic.  To bring it back around, I don't see a Tau buffet working well in a tournament sense.  Something like this would have to be against other lists that could do the same thing- essentially creating a whole new set of lists.

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Army List] Why no flexibility in upgrade sizes?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 1:11 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:14 am
Posts: 103
Location: Germany (NRW)
Okay, here comes a new player:

Wasnt the whole purpose of these lists for all armys to give a limited ability of customization for better balancing?

I mean, I am sure everybody knows a tabletop game where every miniature could have been taken for a price cost tailored only for that miniature?! Granted, those are mostly skirmish games. I guess there is a reason why this aspect is approached in skirmish games... Is Epic a skirmish game... pretty sure no.

I made a list today for a 3000 points game and actually I had it done earlier but with that 5.1 draft it didn't work as well imo. It took me 5 minutes to modify, considering the basic stuff. And about 20 minutes of fiddling around with my last 300ish points. Therefore I'd love a bit more flexibility.

But not in creating new balance issues. I guess its a fine line to wander and I am supporting Honda on that. This list needs playtesting as it is now. We can talk about customization later. Especially right now I want to play with one list and not every other week with minor tweaks. Just tried the new Firewarrior today and I like them better, not good, but better.

(For the record, I lost that game against Death Guard horribly... Not sure, but three titans and two plague towers are too much. I had never ever enough firepower for that.
Getting back to that thread, because looking at the death guard lists: They have customization posibilities in there...)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Army List] Why no flexibility in upgrade sizes?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:58 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
I made a list today for a 3000 points game and actually I had it done earlier but with that 5.1 draft it didn't work as well imo. It took me 5 minutes to modify, considering the basic stuff. And about 20 minutes of fiddling around with my last 300ish points. Therefore I'd love a bit more flexibility

It's funny Assariel but this is exactly what I went through which prompted me to post regarding the loss of the 4 strong HH formation  :vD  It's nice to see new people getting the same issues that I do as it makes me (and others I guess) realise I'm not just moaning for the sake of it.  :agree: Cheers

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: [Army List] Why no flexibility in upgrade sizes?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:47 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote: (Moscovian @ 18 Mar. 2009, 18:05 )

Why not make the buffet for everyone though.

Because a lot of armies/races are a lot more "regimented" in their organizational, and even combat, doctrines; being the "ultimate in flexibilty" would make the Tau army unique.

Anyway, I whipped up a "Buff'Et Sept Army List" and put it in the Other Forces forum.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

cron

Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net