Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 140 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.

 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 5:08 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 7:23 am
Posts: 18
Evil and Chaos wrote:
Opinion : Gun Drones are unattractive so nobody's taking them.
Recommendation for change : Decrease points cost for the formation to 125pts, and to 75pts for the upgrade.


I don't think they are better at 125 pts...
They can't garrison and will often prevent other from doing so if taken as an upgrade (or prevent stealth suits from teleporting).
I like disrupt and embarking them in a tigershark but without scouting ability and markerlights they disembark and make the opponent laugh at their low firepower...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 5:11 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Quote:
I don't think they are better at 125 pts...

So that's the negative... now where the positive?
How would you approach making them better?

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:02 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 1:50 am
Posts: 835
Evil and Chaos wrote:
Quote:
I don't think they are better at 125 pts...

So that's the negative... now where the positive?
How would you approach making them better?

Some possible options.

Removal of the formation. Basically, you can't drop the cost much further for fear of popcorn. You can't really increase formation size. And there'd be resistance from the 40K purists to a significant change in baseline stats. A possible solution if a Drone Formation is wanted, is removing the 'standard' Drones in favor of, for example, Sniper Drones or Heavy Gun Drones. Making them (or including) Markerlight Drones is probably a bad idea.

Upgrades gain Disposable. Or some equivalent or limited form of BM/Assault reduction. That seems to be a big issue.

Given Scout. Allows them to Garrison, which is another big issue. And doesn't seem too out of character.

Minor Devilfish change. Adding a Grot-like transport option for Devilfish might make them useful in mechanized formations. This'd probably require a change to the Upgrades (1-4 for 25pts each) if you made Devilfish 2+1Drone, so they'd be more utilized.

A lot of it depends on what the perceived role is. That seems to be the bigger issue. Neal brought it up in the Space Wolves thread. Why are they purchased in 40K? What tactical or strategic role do they fulfill? If other things do a similar job, why is one taken over the other? I'm not conversant enough with Tau (or 40K) to answer those questions. But just cramming them in the list "because they're in 40K" seems like the wrong approach.

Morgan Vening


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:29 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 6:05 pm
Posts: 169
Location: Katy, Republic of Texas
First off, let me just say that at this point, incremental changes with low risk are the order
for the day. I love the idea of the new crisis models, but for the time being, they are just
new models and capabilities, without a clear understanding of how they are used. So without more
info they are going to miss this cut.

On to the issues:


Quote:
Opinion : Hammerheads are greatly underperforming.
Recommendation for change : Reduce price of Hammerhead formation to 200pts, Hammerhead upgrade to 100pts. Increase Fusion Hammerhead's attack stat to 4+.


H: I can support these changes


Quote:
Probably change Ion Cannon's AP stat from AP4+ to AP3+.


Although I'm not against some sort of bump, I will defer this until we can evaluate the above cost
changes. Too many changes at one time muddies the results.


Quote:
Opinion : The Manta is greatly underperforming.
Recommendation for change : Add the Fearless Special Ability. Drop to 550pts. Give it FF 4+. Add a markerlight.


H: Sigh...I will support these changes, except I would like us to test the cost at 650.


Quote:
Opinion : "Recon" formation has internal balance issues.
Recommendation for change : Split "Recon" into a Tetra formation (150pts) and a Piranha formation (175pts). Failing that, just increase the cost of the Recon formation to 175pts.


H: No, to split formations. No to hard coding the types in the formations. I can support a points
jump to 175, though I remain unconvinced that it is necessary.

Quote:
Opinion : Crisis Suits are under performing.
Recommendation for change : Add Invulnerable Save. Change CC rating to 5+. Change their MW shot to 4+.


H: I will support these changes: Add Invulnerable Save. Change their MW shot to 4+.

Quote:
Opinion : Orca slightly under performs.
Recommendation for change : Reduce points cost for Orca to 125pts.


H: No change at this time.

Quote:
Opinion : Broadside suits are slightly over-performing.
Recommendation for change : Increase points cost of formation to 325pts, increase upgrade cost to 150pts.


H: No change at this time.

Quote:
Opinion : Gun Drones are unattractive so nobody's taking them.
Recommendation for change : Decrease points cost for the formation to 125pts, and to 75pts for the upgrade.


H: No change at this time.

I think that's it for now. Let's test these changes, along with the Skyray formation at 250 and see where we land.

Cheers,

_________________
Remember Taros? We do.

- 23rd Elysian Drop Regiment


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:35 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
OK cool!

Honda since you've picked what to change can you put out V6.3 with the changes in place, and the last lingering typos corrected?

It will make it easier to spur on new testing if we have a new version of the list, rather than "hiding" the new set of stats to test at the end of a thread that's been running for over a month.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:55 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
So if you take a recon, broadsides and 6 strong HH formation you're right back in the position you started in? Meaning the HHs are still naff for less points but you get nothing for it. Congrats! we've just swallowed any benefit....


Last edited by Dobbsy on Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:57 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Dobbsy, I think you didn't notice the part where Honda shot down price increases for those two formations.

Honda basically only enacted power boost proposals, and none of the power reduction proposals.

We'll see if that proves to be overpowered or not after a bit of testing, I guess...

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Last edited by Evil and Chaos on Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:59 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
ahh yep! you're right. apologies.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:34 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 7:23 am
Posts: 18
Great, i'll surely try these changes in my next game, HH are a good choice now!

About the future of gun drones... I totally agree with Morgan Vening! Drones need a more specific tactical role and probably that role should be "infantry support" oriented. I think they should be only an upgrade and not a standalone formation and have scout ability for easier deploying, garrisoning and to make a better use of jet pack when disembarking (if drones are an upgrade is really difficult to use jetpack because of coherency rules).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:16 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 6:05 pm
Posts: 169
Location: Katy, Republic of Texas
@E&C: Regarding a v6.3, yes I will do that, hopefully this weekend.

Quote:
About the future of gun drones... I totally agree with Morgan Vening! Drones need a more specific tactical role and probably that role should be "infantry support" oriented. I think they should be only an upgrade and not a standalone formation and have scout ability for easier deploying, garrisoning and to make a better use of jet pack when disembarking (if drones are an upgrade is really difficult to use jetpack because of coherency rules).


This list has struggled with what to do with drones. They've existed, not existed, been absorbed and never been quite satisfactory for the broader community. As they currently stand, they are not a threat to the balance of the list (i.e. very few people bother with them). Radical changes "could" have significant impacts to other formations because of the rules that they share. So at this stage and for the upcoming freeze, don't expect much in the way of changes. As I've said before, if the frozen list only has this one formation that people have an issue with, and not because it's over-powered, then we will have come a very long way.

So my advice would be to focus attention on the items that are currently up for discussion and their testing.

Cheers,

_________________
Remember Taros? We do.

- 23rd Elysian Drop Regiment


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 9:09 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 7:23 am
Posts: 18
Sure!! ;-) I was just thinking about *far* future of drones, eheheh...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:47 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 7:23 am
Posts: 18
I tried the changes in a couple of matches yesterday. I really like the new fusion HH:a fast and skimmerer RA hunter for a little price.

I'm a little worried about the point drop of the manta because at 650 you can deploy both manta and ax-1-0 in a 3000 point army having a high number of macroweapon (crisis,HH,maybe the spaceship) and 2 TK. Isn't a bit strong?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:48 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Quote:
I'm a little worried about the point drop of the manta because at 650 you can deploy both manta and ax-1-0 in a 3000 point army having a high number of macroweapon (crisis,HH,maybe the spaceship) and 2 TK. Isn't a bit strong?

Well, that army would have no fighter cover at all, so I would think it would tend to suffer in that regard...

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:04 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:34 pm
Posts: 143
Location: Australia
I haven't played Tau yet but am just starting to gear up to collect a Tau army.

I've been reading the Tau threads and enjoyed this one in particular.

Obviously I have no experience as yet but if I was asked, I would've guessed that the Hammerhead with Railgun would've been at least as effective as the Broadside considering it moves twice the distance and has Skimmer, has more weapons and can't be affected by AP weapons. I realise the Broadside has RA, is Infantry and has a slightly better to-hit with its railguns but I would've thought this would've be at least balanced by the Hammerheads Speed/Skimmer/extra weapons.....

Just a passing comment, that's all :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My thoughts on the current state of the Tau.
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:53 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
In practice, the heavy armour of the Broadside suit is very useful to the Tau army, as it largely lacks such heavily armoured units. So that makes it a little more useful in the context of the army as a whole than its pure stats would otherwise suggest.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 140 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net