Ok I'm updating this post since we got such a huge outpouring of information last time
Proposed changes:
1. Add the Avenger Fighter
2. Drop the Crusader back to 4+ CC.
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Skitarii under review http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=24786 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Vaaish [ Sun Mar 10, 2013 8:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Skitarii under review |
With the list being out for a time now and hopefully a few games under people's belts I figured it would be a good time to start discussions in preparation for releasing the next version. A couple of points we are looking for data on based on discussions prior to releasing the current skitarii list: 1. reduction of the minorus coy to 2 units 2. How does the majoris stack up? 3. Demi-century upgrades 4. AA capabilities? How are people finding the robots? Deficiencies that you feel need addressed? Overall competitiveness and fun? Thanks! |
|
| Author: | Vaaish [ Sat May 25, 2013 2:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skitarii under review |
Ok I'm updating this post since we got such a huge outpouring of information last time Proposed changes: 1. Add the Avenger Fighter 2. Drop the Crusader back to 4+ CC. |
|
| Author: | mordoten [ Sat May 25, 2013 8:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skitarii under review |
Yes! And Yes. |
|
| Author: | madd0ct0r [ Tue May 28, 2013 12:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skitarii under review |
question. If i have a formation of two CAP minori, can each carry a different formation? |
|
| Author: | Vaaish [ Mon Aug 05, 2013 7:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skitarii under review |
I had a thought today about the cataphractii allied macharius in the AdMech list. I really like the interworking of the titan legions and skitarii list and with the eventual creation of the cataphractii list, I'd like to see that integrated as well. Eventually I think I'll be dropping the specific macharius unit in the AdMech list and instead change it to an entry similar to the Titan allies entry so you'd be able to pull any core formation from the cataphractii list as allies. Theoretically this means you could see superheavies like baneblades or russ companies appear again in skitarii lists as allies. It really depends on what ends up core in the list. Any thoughts, comments or objections to this? |
|
| Author: | Vaaish [ Mon Aug 05, 2013 7:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skitarii under review |
I see your point, I didn't necessarily mean full 10 tank companies. Just whatever detachment size we end up with in the Cataphractii list. |
|
| Author: | Blip [ Mon Aug 05, 2013 10:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skitarii under review |
Would suit me. I started painting up some proxies as ad mech back when they could take russ etc. Been wondering what to do with them since. Been wondering about counts-as iron warriors but if they could do both id be very happy. |
|
| Author: | Vaaish [ Mon Sep 02, 2013 6:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skitarii under review |
Ok, it's been a bit and I haven't seen anything in the way of objections to the proposed Avenger fighter changes so we are just going to go with it and reconcile the difference when it becomes necessary. I'm working through a couple of other changes here but feel free to use the changes posted earlier until I can get a list out. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|