Because they might not be canon but the knightworld list needs a bit of variety and people love to scratch-build their own models anyway.
All same stats as Paladin/Errant except for the weapon configs of course:
***Belier Knight (belier means battering ram in French apparently) 2 x Flamestorm Cannon - 15cm, AP3+, Ignore Cover (should it give ignore cover to FF too? The land raider redeemer flamestorm cannon doesn't somehow) Siege Hammer - (assault weapon), MW, +1EA (hammer, or drill or whatever works) This knight variant is to help out with the glaring problem of enemy infantry using terrain, especially buildings, to hide from the knights. It doesn't completely fix the problem, but helps out so at least there's a chance for the knights.
***Pavise Knight 4+ Armour save instead of 5+. Thick Rear Armour Twin Assault Cannon (30cm, AP4+/AT4+) instead of Knight Cannon Chain Fist as normal This knight is meant to provide cover, at least taking the first hit of a volley, for the other knights. Could make the errant more viable as it makes it easier to advance through enemy fire to get close. But is the small weapon downgrade (-15cm) enough to warrant the higher save?
***Culverin Knight Battle Cannon, 75cm, AP4+/AT4+, Sniper (no assault weapon except for the shock lance) A 'sniper' knight. Increased range and sniper probably makes up for the fact of how vulnerable they become to being charged in close combat.
***(no idea for a name) Knight Mini Burner (15cm) small arms EA+1 OR (close combat) assault weapons EA+2 Chain Fist as normal A firefight-ish knight. Due to the way attacks work for WE, this chap if charging could get 5 attacks in close combat: - 1 normal from being a DC1 WE - 1 normal from shock lance when charging - 2 normal from mini burner - 1 MW from chain fist Still, he's giving up a lot by not having the knight cannon or any ranged weapons at all.
Any thoughts?
_________________  
|