Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
Warhound Titan Critical Hit - Voting Round 2 http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=19667 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Fri Nov 12, 2010 11:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Warhound Titan Critical Hit - Voting Round 2 |
Round One of Voting garnered 39 hands in the air, and, adjusted for MoK's mistaken vote, resulted in three popular choices, with support levels of 21%, 21%, and 30%. All other options except "No change" had little-to-no support, and have been dropped from Round Two. The option of "no change" only had 18% support in Round One, and so has been dropped from Round Two. Please pick one of the options below. We will not adopt a new Critical Hit Effect until a clear majority leader has emerged. A round threeo of voting may be required, and each round of voting shall run for one week. If the vote has enough weight behind it, I will submit the chosen proposal to the ERC for adoption across all Imperial lists. The options in Round Two are: OPTION ONE Quote: Critical Hit Effect: The Warhound's Plasma reactor has been damaged. Roll a D6 for the Warhound in the end phase of every turn: on a roll of 1 the reactor explodes destroying the Warhound, on a roll of 2-3 the Warhound suffers one more point of damage, and on a roll of 4-6 the reactor is repaired and will cause no further trouble. If the reactor explodes, any units within 5cms of the Warhound will be hit on a 6+. OPTION TWO Quote: Critical Hit Effect: The Warhound has been hit in a vital location and explodes. Any units within 5cms of the Warhound will be hit on a 6+. OPTION THREE Quote: Critical Hit Effect: A secondary explosion causes further damage to the Warhound, and it loses 1 point of Damage Capacity
|
Author: | Angel_of_Caliban [ Fri Nov 12, 2010 10:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Warhound Titan Critical Hit - Voting Round 2 |
I don't think it was completely fair to drop "No Change" |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Fri Nov 12, 2010 11:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Warhound Titan Critical Hit - Voting Round 2 |
Angel_of_Caliban wrote: I don't think it was completely fair to drop "No Change" Everything else in the vote had either no votes or only 1-2 votes. "No change", as the smallest of the four significant voting blocks (Those that garnered more than 1-2 votes), was culled. Considering that round 1 was 82% in favour of a change of some kind*** from 39 votes, I do not think dropping "No Change" was unfair. If people had have voted more than 18% in favour of "No Change", it'd still be in the running. ***Incidentally, the staw poll from the previous week also resulted with 82% in favour of change, from 40 votes. |
Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Fri Nov 12, 2010 11:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Warhound Titan Critical Hit - Voting Round 2 |
I voted for #3, but I'd be okay with #1. |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Warhound Titan Critical Hit - Voting Round 2 |
5 days of voting to go. |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Tue Nov 16, 2010 1:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Warhound Titan Critical Hit - Voting Round 2 |
3 Days of voting to go. |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Warhound Titan Critical Hit - Voting Round 2 |
2 more days of voting to go. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |