| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| AMTL 3.18 http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=19088 |
Page 1 of 5 |
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Thu Sep 09, 2010 2:50 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | AMTL 3.18 | ||
Here's the latest version. Changes for 3.18: Turbolaser returns to 25pts God Machines rule modified Forge Knights now allowed in 6’s or 3’s. Melta Cannon FF stat upgraded from TKd3 to TKd6 If I've missed anything that was agreed upon please let me know.
|
|||
| Author: | Jaggedtoothgrin [ Thu Sep 09, 2010 3:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AMTL 3.18 |
you also removed the corvus pod restriction on support infantry (not forgotten to change, but not listed in the changes) i'd thought that the single weapon surcharge was being dropped (since it mainly penalises solo warhounds, which are already penalised by the 'solo surcharge') but that may have just been my wishful thinking. |
|
| Author: | Vaaish [ Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AMTL 3.18 |
I've been running over the list for the last few days thinking over how to work the options available. Not that this will come into play often, but wasn't the lysander moving back into the warmonger profile as opposed to a separate entry in the list in the support section? I hadn't really noticed it earlier since I've usually ignore the entry as I haven't taken a warmonger 
|
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AMTL 3.18 |
With the expanded number of support slots available that shouldn't be nessesary. |
|
| Author: | Vaaish [ Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AMTL 3.18 |
I was thinking it was more due to organizational aspect rather than available slots since only the warmonger can take one and I think it's standard equipment. EDIT: followup question, do both emperor titan versions have a single leg bastion. In other words, they can take 0-1 skitarii detachments. or do they have two leg bastions allowing them to carry up two skitarii detachments total. |
|
| Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AMTL 3.18 |
Evil and Chaos wrote: Melta Cannon FF stat upgraded from TKd3 to TKd6 Is the change to D6 just for small arms or does it apply to ranged attacks as well? Right now on the table of weapon stats it says D6 for small arms and D3 for ranged attacks. |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AMTL 3.18 |
Small arms only. |
|
| Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Wed Sep 15, 2010 1:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AMTL 3.18 |
Okay, on problem. I'm glad I asked. I thought that it might be a typo. |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Wed Sep 15, 2010 1:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AMTL 3.18 |
As a melta weapon, I reason that it should get more powerful in close. |
|
| Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Wed Sep 15, 2010 1:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AMTL 3.18 |
That makes sense. |
|
| Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AMTL 3.18 |
One more question. Which are the correct stats for the Executioner? I presume those given on the reference sheet. |
|
| Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AMTL 3.18 |
I can't download at home as I've run out of data allowance this month, but how have you resolved the TLD balance problem? or is it just accepted that some choices will be better than others? |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AMTL 3.18 |
The_Real_Chris wrote: I can't download at home as I've run out of data allowance this month, but how have you resolved the TLD balance problem? or is it just accepted that some choices will be better than others? At this time, I have accepted the community's collective demand that the TLD remain overpowered. |
|
| Author: | GlynG [ Wed Sep 15, 2010 11:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AMTL 3.18 |
I don't think I contributed to the previous thread but I think the idea of having the TLD at 30-35 points is a good one (actually 30 may be best of the two as you can take 3 for 100 points). Who cares if you maybe end up with underused points occasionally like a 2995 point list? It happens all the time in other GW systems and balance between the options encouraging a variety of load-outs is more important. |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Wed Sep 15, 2010 11:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AMTL 3.18 |
30pts would be my preferred solution at this time, but I got yelled at. :-( |
|
| Page 1 of 5 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|
