Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 1 of 3
  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
Yes 60%  60%  [ 24 ]
No 40%  40%  [ 16 ]
Total votes : 40

Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
Evil and Chaos
 Post subject: Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:37 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Let's hear your opinions.

For reference, here is AMTL v3: http://www.tacticalwargames.net/cgi-bin....t=11879

And here is my Knightworld list proposal: http://www.tacticalwargames.net/cgi-bin....t=12122

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
nealhunt
 Post subject: Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:47 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Bare essentials - 1 pattern, 2 at most.

Edit:  I voted yes, but they could reasonably be omitted entirely.

_________________
Neal
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
zombocom
 Post subject: Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:51 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 5569
Personally I don't even think they should have their own army list. They should be dropped entirely.

_________________
http://www.troublemakergames.co.uk/
Epic: Hive Development Thread
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Dwarf Supreme
 Post subject: Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:57 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 11149
Location: Canton, CT, USA
Yes, but only a select few, like Paladins, Lancers and Errants.  Leave the full variety for the Knight list.

_________________
"I don't believe in destiny or the guiding hand of fate." N. Peart
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
ragnarok
 Post subject: Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 5:02 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 2084
Location: Reading, England
I think that a single type of knight should be allowed.

I was glacing through a friends white dwarf (I refuse to buy it) and I am sure that it had a chaos knight datasheet in it, or said that such a datasheet would soon be up on the website.

If I wasn't miss reading it then it means GW is willling to admit to knights existing.

_________________
Tyranid air marshal
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
vanvlak
 Post subject: Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 5:58 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:52 am
Posts: 10348
Location: Malta
Nope- they should certainly exist, but as an independent list.

_________________
Back from oblivion (again)?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PlushWombat
 Post subject: Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:02 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:03 am
Posts: 135
Location: State of Confusion (USA)
If included in the main AMTL list...then it should limited to one type of Knight and then only as a replacment for sentinels...otherwise seperate Knights list!

Regards

PlushWombat

_________________
Cry Havoc! and Let Slip the Puppies of Confusion!
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Pulsar
 Post subject: Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:38 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 726
Location: London
they should have there own list and not be part of the main one.

_________________
"Dyslexia is a Privilege, not a right"
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Tiny-Tim
 Post subject: Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:13 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:32 pm
Posts: 4893
Location: North Yorkshire
I've voted no. I would rather have a solid tested list that has enough fluff to stand on its own.

There are problems with Knights - background, role, models. I remember them from when they first appeared and would like to see them return, but I want an AMTL list more. So separate list later is my point of view.

_________________
_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk - home of the UK Epic tournament scene
NetEA NetERC Xenos Lists Chair
NetEA Ork + Feral Ork + Speed Freak Champion
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Gary
 Post subject: Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:41 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:38 pm
Posts: 129
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
I'd like to see a limited selection included as allies, in the same way that skitarii are included. The full range of knight units should be in a separate list.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Mephiston
 Post subject: Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:40 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:52 pm
Posts: 4262
I voted no, but could see some arguement for a single type within the list. But as Tim says lets get a Titan focused list sorted and playtested before we get sidetracked again :)
Top
 Profile  
 
Pariah Press
 Post subject: Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:56 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 2:42 am
Posts: 253
I vote yes.  However, the heavy knights should be restricted to the Knight World list.  Paladins, as the most commonly available Knight miniature, should be the type of Knight included in AMTL if there is only one choice available.  I'd like to see Lancers, too, but I'm not so worked-up about it since I've seen the Knight World list.

_________________
-Ethan
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Onyx
 Post subject: Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:00 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 10:14 am
Posts: 3416
Location: Western Australia

(Hena @ Mar. 24 2008,22:51)
QUOTE
I'm hoping for three. Close support (Lancer), medium range (Paladin) and heavy (the quake versions).

I vote yes.
I would definately like to see the 3 classes of Knight that Hena has listed.




_________________
Just call me Steve.

NetEA Rules Chair
NetEA FAQ

Want to play Iron Warriors in Epic Armageddon? Click HERE
Some of my Armies.
My Hobby site.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Mark_Logue
 Post subject: Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list?
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:09 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 7:31 am
Posts: 1099
Location: Australia
I vote yes and I want all the types of knights available in the list!  I have all the knights painted to match various titans so it does strongly bias my opinion.

_________________
Epic- A version of the game with even smaller models that is often dominated by titans which are vehicles the size of a large building and have the ability to pwn...everything. There is also infantry, whose only function in Epic is to provide valuable traction to Titans walking across snowy paths.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 1 of 3
  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net