Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

Whats the role of VCs, PDs, QCs and MCs

 Post subject: Whats the role of VCs, PDs, QCs and MCs
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:04 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 2084
Location: Reading, England
As the title suggests I am wondering what everyone?s ideas are on the roles of the volcano cannon, plasma destructor, quake cannon and melta cannon. ?Do you think that they (or some of them) fulfil similar roles, or do you think that they are have different battlefield roles and shouldn?t be similar, thus if you want to kill titans use a volcano cannon.

I think that they represent a family of titan killer weapons with the volcano cannon at the top and the others trading the ability to fell war engines in a single shot to be able to deal with a broader range of targets (or too be cheaper).

The plasma destructor (with 60cm 4x MW4+ TK(1) slow firing) swaps number of DC inflicted per turn, for the ability to strike down several targets a turn, or to obliterate an armoured column with an alpha strike.

The quake cannon (using Ilushia?s proposal) again swaps out its range and multi DC inflictorbility, this time to be able suppress formations with concussion blasts.

Finally we have the melta cannon. ?This I have no idea what it should be (which is a problem, since I am building a siege titan with two of them at the moment). ?I believe that it should be better at short range than at long range (like all melta weapons), but I don?t think it should have the volcano cannons TK(D3) ability. ?I?m not sure what its stats use to be like, but I get the impression that the VC is the be all and end all of titan killiness (from the siege of the emperors palace fluff where it makes the point that Legio Ignatum (I think) use them to destroy many of the titans of Legio Mortis as they attempt to breach the walls). ?I would go with something like:

60cm MW2+ or 30cm MW2+ TK(1)

This way its use is more against high armour units and low RA units rather than Wes.

I am splitting this off from the ?support weapons should be...? thread since it isn?t about what they should be, but rather what they should do.




Finally, somewhat off topic but I don?t care it is my thread :) .

Support missiles. ?I am not a fan of them, mainly because they use all their firepower in one turn, so unless you are paying for each weapon you want them to be very good for one turn, which makes them too good.

Anyhow, I?ve been thinking of the vortex missile and thought, why don?t we use (or those who want to use support missiles use) a rule similar to that of the vortex grenade in apocalypse. ?Something along the lines of:

Vortex missile
CODE

Weapon ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Range ? ? ?firepower ? ? notes
Vortex missile ? ?100cm ? ? ? ? 3+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ignore cover, ignore shields, see below


Roll to hit as normal, if you miss then the missile malfunctions and nothing happens. ?If you hit place the vortex missile template (aka the vortex grenade template) over the target formation, so that the entire template is within range.

Any infantry, light vehicle or armoured vehicle unit that the template touches is removed from play, no saves of any kind are permitted. ?Any war engine touched by the template lose D6 DC. ?No saves allowed.

Any objective touched by the template is removed on a roll of 4+.

In the end phase, roll 2D6 and the scatter dice and move the template to distance shown in the direction shown. ?If a double is rolled then the warp rift closes up and remove the template from play, similar if the template moves off the board then it will not re-entry play.


I have it ignoring shields, since the only protect their is from the warp is to have a Gellar field, which most non starships don?t have as standard. ?The removing objective from play could possibly be abused (ie shoot your own blitz to deny the objective to your opponent), but I can some armies (the IG spring to mind) not being able to find a strategic location after it has been swallowed by the warp.

?Right lads. ?We are to advance and capture hill 421?
A strange purplely crackling hole in reality appears and swallows the hill.
?Emperor?s golden toilet! ?Where?s the hill gone? ?Right lads, back to base.?

_________________
Tyranid air marshal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Whats the role of VCs, PDs, QCs and MCs
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:52 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
Is see the frou weapons so:
Vulcano Cannon = long range single War Engine Killer
Quake Cannon = long range single hard Infantry/Vehicle Killer
Plasma Destructor = long range multiple soft to medium Infantry/Vehicle Killer
Melta Cannon = short range multiple hard Infantry/Vehilce and War Engine Killer (= a combination of all of the above but at maximum 30cm perhabs only 15cm)

One-Shot Missiles should be very powerful if they hit. You have only one (ore two on a Warlord). So they should have the destructive equivalent of 3-4 turns of shooting.

The Vortex Missile proposal i like. But perhabs it should come with a points cost regardless which armylist version is used because of its high destructiveness.

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Whats the role of VCs, PDs, QCs and MCs
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:30 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
I'd love to see a set of official Vortex weapon rules ala the ones you propose.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Whats the role of VCs, PDs, QCs and MCs
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:32 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 11147
Location: Canton, CT, USA

(BlackLegion @ Dec. 11 2007,14:52)
QUOTE
Is see the frou weapons so:
Vulcano Cannon = long range single War Engine Killer
Quake Cannon = long range single hard Infantry/Vehicle Killer
Plasma Destructor = long range multiple soft to medium Infantry/Vehicle Killer
Melta Cannon = short range multiple hard Infantry/Vehilce and War Engine Killer

That's about how I see them as well, each with a different role.

_________________
"I don't believe in destiny or the guiding hand of fate." N. Peart


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Whats the role of VCs, PDs, QCs and MCs
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:00 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:50 am
Posts: 1189
I tend to see them something like this...

Volcano Cannon: Great for punching out titans, or anything else for that matter, but only kills one thing really dead.

Quake Cannons: These are like the main deck guns on a battleship, can be used to either fire high-explosive suppression rounds great for breaking up lines, or can fire penetrators which will absolutely decimate whatever they hit, but won't hit more then one thing.

Plasma Destructor: This one seems to be to be the most 'kills lots of stuff' out of the list. Firing out big balls of plasma at the opponents which vaporize virtually anything they touch, great for killing multiple heavily armored targets, but not as good at killing single targets as the VC or QC.

Melta-Cannons: These things kill stuff really really dead, but only at very short range. The closer, the better, as near as I can see. But they won't kill lots of stuff, really. Armor's virtually worthless against them as anything hit by them  is reduced to a cloud of rapidly expanding vapor. Great at killing just about anything (best at killing heavily armored things) but extremely short range. Still not as good at straight armor penetration as the VC, though, against heavily reinforced items like war engines.






Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Whats the role of VCs, PDs, QCs and MCs
PostPosted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:30 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 2084
Location: Reading, England
Hena.  Are you againt the Vortex missile because it eats objectives (which I put in there to see what peoples reactions to destroyable objectives would be), or because it is very killy?

_________________
Tyranid air marshal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Whats the role of VCs, PDs, QCs and MCs
PostPosted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 7:22 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:50 am
Posts: 1189
I'm still in favor of BP3, TK(1), Ignore Cover on the vortex missile. That means on sustained-fire it has a 3+ chance to kill basically anything except a war engine instantly. And it can potentially deal up to half a warengine's total DC in a single shot. If you really wanna make it extremely titan-killy make it TK(2), then it can potentially kill an unshielded war-engine (ANY unshielded war engine) in a single blow.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net