A NetEA supplement would be best served by presenting the core titan list first and foremost.

For what it is worth, this is my point of view.

I'm getting some positive noises so far.
If EUK end up rejecting it, then things as regards the supplement will probably change.

Though to throw a left field suggestion in - rather than having the supplement mainly feature one titan list, with the other relegated to the appendix, could the supplement actually feature both lists in the main text? - a combined campaign where both the War Gryphons and Legio Destructor titan legions fight. It would make the scale of the conflict even more epic and both lists could be included more side-to-side as valid choices. The background could refer to the different forge world / titan schools following different patterns and construction rules.

Yes, that's correct.

I don't think the War Gryphonnes list can be as balanced as a list based on a more restrictive weapons selection set. That makes the former not as good as the latter IMO.

I personally also like the modern configuration rules, and think that having a variant list on those lines is a cool thing. I'm all for having as many variant lists as is humanly possible


They've indicated they're interested in a collaboration, in the same manner as the NetEA Tau list also became the EUK Tau list.

I had already begun work on the Legio Destructor list before they mentioned the possibility to me, incidentally, because I already knew that there were some things I could do to make the AMTL list more balanced (And more tactically interesting, too) if I was writing a "Director's cut" list.


It's my time to waste.

I'm quite aware that EUK could reject my list variant or make their own list in the end, etc, leaving me with egg on my face.

Stuff like that happens all the time to me, I'm used to looking silly.


I can only hope that I can manage to write the supplement in a clearly deliniated manner, then.

Guys, could you please stop heaping abuse on somebody that's actually putting in a lot of work on a NetEA project? This is not the way to get a good Titan list, it's the way to kill the entire NetEA project.

Nobody's in it for the money here, so the tolerance for bullshit will be a lot lower.

I'm all for having as many variant lists as possible. But this is based on the assumption that we have a set of universally accepted core lists. Thus for SM/IG/Ork we can have many variant chapter/regiment/warband lists but we have the the three core lists in EA rulebook.

I have thought of approaching it this way, with the story having a War Gryphonnes detachment sent to help in the war.

Core lists are an abomination. It leads to stuff like all IG regiments turning into mechanized infantry and all Eldar overloading on aspect warriors.

If GW or FW are going to see the supplement the Destructor list does have its merits

Well I agree that Biel-Tann craftworld was nt the best choice for one official Eldar list. But not all IG armies are mechanized. I tend to go that way as i like tanks and with my poor eyesight I struggled to paint 6mm infantry. But I have regularly faced footsloging IG units and i have found them to be very effective.

I think it is important to have at least one universally accepted AMTL list. My friend Dean is my regular opponent for W40k and LOTR and an occasional EA opponent. He views the EUK lists as the closest to official lists. If I was to turn up with a Net EA approved list then that would mean nothing to him. If I was to play him with an AMTL list that was EUK approved then i would have no problems.

NetEA supplements

I don't think EUK would want to be percieved as influencing NetEA supplements