Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Focus of this list?

 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:24 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 6:38 pm
Posts: 1673
Location: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Quote (The_Real_Chris @ 29 Mar. 2006 (12:37))
Well the amtl isn't alone the Tau list is also generic.

IMO, all of the lists are generic except the Eldar list (and maybe the seigemasters). If you are wondering, I consider the number and variety of required formations (Warhost, companies, etc) available to an army to be a measure of how generic an army list is.

So, if you guys want variant lists like the eldar have, instead of the big catch-all lists that the rest have, get to work and let's see some (I don't have time, myself).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 8:17 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
IMHO, the ATML list is essentially a variant list to begin with.  Or perhaps to be more accurate it might be called a niche list.

The background at this point leaves virtually no room for "custom" titan legions in the manner of variant lists for other races.  There is just too little to work with.

I suppose anyone is free to make stuff up out of whole cloth, but there is essentially no official material to draw up separate abilities/focus as there is with, say, different Craftworlds or non-Codex Marine chapters.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 8:35 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote (Blarg D Impaler @ 29 Mar. 2006 (17:25))
titan heavy legion (min. of 67% titans)
fast attack titan legion (no warlords, Valkyries & Vultures allowed limited numbers)
infantry heavy titan legion (up to 1/2 core units may be infantry companies)
SHV heavy titan legion (up to 1/2 core units may be equivelant IG SHV companies)
Knight World "titan legion" (lots of knights and infantry w/ limited titans for nobles)
Divisio Mandati legion (Emperor Titans!)
Divisio Investigatus legion (lots of Ordinatus, limited alien tech, other wacky stuff)
Divisio Telepathica legion (Psi-Titans, Grey Knights, Deathwatch? space marines)

To me, that looks like at least eight possible variants on this "niche" list, so I think there is definitely room to work.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 8:57 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 6:38 pm
Posts: 1673
Location: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Quote (Chroma @ 29 Mar. 2006 (14:35))
Quote (Blarg D Impaler @ 29 Mar. 2006 (17:25))
titan heavy legion (min. of 67% titans)
fast attack titan legion (no warlords, Valkyries & Vultures allowed limited numbers)
infantry heavy titan legion (up to 1/2 core units may be infantry companies)
SHV heavy titan legion (up to 1/2 core units may be equivelant IG SHV companies)
Knight World "titan legion" (lots of knights and infantry w/ limited titans for nobles)
Divisio Mandati legion (Emperor Titans!)
Divisio Investigatus legion (lots of Ordinatus, limited alien tech, other wacky stuff)
Divisio Telepathica legion (Psi-Titans, Grey Knights, Deathwatch? space marines)

To me, that looks like at least eight possible variants on this "niche" list, so I think there is definitely room to work.

So, I think we'll need to prioritize.

1) Titan heavy AMTL; this could cover:
? ? ? titan heavy legion (min. of 67% titans)

2) Tech Guard heavy AMTG; this could cover:
? ? ? fast attack titan legion (no warlords, Valkyries & Vultures allowed limited numbers)
? ? ? infantry heavy titan legion (up to 1/2 core units may be infantry companies)
? ? ? SHV heavy titan legion (up to 1/2 core units may be equivelant IG SHV companies)

3) Knight heavy AMKH; this could cover:
? ? ? Knight World "titan legion" (lots of knights and infantry w/ limited titans for nobles)

The rest of the lists may be cool, but these are the three traditional (i.e. previously existing) variants. The all-Emperor Titan army will have to excuse itself, the psi titans can be represented by the wide variety of weapons available in the Titan list, and the Xenos legion can be handled in a similar way (at least for the time being).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:07 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:08 pm
Posts: 356
Location: Beavercreek, Ohio, USA
Quote (nealhunt @ 29 Mar. 2006 (15:17))
IMHO, the ATML list is essentially a variant list to begin with. ?Or perhaps to be more accurate it might be called a niche list.

The background at this point leaves virtually no room for "custom" titan legions in the manner of variant lists for other races. ?There is just too little to work with.

I suppose anyone is free to make stuff up out of whole cloth, but there is essentially no official material to work with to draw up separate abilitiesfocus as there is with, say, different Craftworlds or non-Codex Marine chapters.

Well, yes the AMTL is a niche list, and no, it is not.  The Adeptus Mechanicus is the red-headed stepchild of the Imperium as far as GW has presented it.  Or, more accurately, not presented it.  Let's face it, the AM has been mentioned more than presented, and this lack of definition has hampered development of this list since the beginning.

The Space Marines have been detailed down to their internal organs, the Imperial Guard has had reams of stories written about them, and the different ordos of the "secret" Inquisition are better known than the different titan legions.  Yet who supplies the Imperium with their war machines?  Who are the masters of Imperial technology?  Who had their diety accomodated in Imperial theology so that they would play along?  The Adeptus Mechanicus, and we hardly know a damn thing about them.

If you want to make different army lists for different legions you are going to pretty much have to strike out into territory that Games Workshop has abandoned.  When's the last time that GW has said something definitive about the different titan legions?  Was it for the Armageddon summer campaign?  If so, the vague descriptions they gave are marginal.  We should be looking into the original Adeptus Titanicus (and supplements) rules, plus what was published for Space marine and Titan legions, for more info.  But don't take this lack of definition as lack of material to work with, think of it as room to grow into.

Yes, there is going to have to be some conjuration of material based upon side panels and brief passages in little noticed fluff.  It will be hard, but it won't be rocket science.

I was thinking about coming up with army lists for different Legios and I figured that best thing to do would be to come up with some basic guidelines.  First, the AMTL is going to be restricted to what they can build (they are based around forgeworlds...) and who they can convince to come along with them (Knight Worlds, primarily).  In the "what they can build" department we have to keep in mind that not all forgeworlds are the same.  Some are huge, some are small, some can produce a wide variety of items while some are limited, and some are technologically advanced while some may be a little less so.  Another variable is going to be access to people.  The forgeworlds that are farther away from Hive Worlds and Knight Worlds are going to have less people for infantry and are going to go for highly trained infantry, servitors, and/or automation where forgeworlds that have a lot of indiginious people are going to be more basic infantry heavy.  It's that thinking that lead me to develop this:

Army Composition Rules:

Determine your Legio (Preference Tables)

Not all titan legions are the same, and a lot of that difference stems not only from differing command tactics and strategies, but also from the abilities of the Forge World from which the legion is raised.  Certain Forge Worlds are better at making certain armaments compared to others, while some have a large pool of people from which to draw troops.  These differences are reflected in the Preference Tables found below.  Each Preference Table will show a small selection of formations that a player can chose a preference.  Whatever formation type is chosen as the first preference can be taken without restriction.  Any remaining formation preferences may only be purchased once per game.  A player may also take a second formation type without restriction if another formation type is listed as completely not allowed ? the player sacrifices the ability to take a type of formation so that he may be unrestricted in taking another formation.  Some formations will be listed as not allowed to be taken as first preference.  This means that a player may not take that formation as a first preference and will always, regardless of player preferences, only be allowed 1 formation per game.  Any formations that are not listed in a Preference Table are assumed to be unrestricted and may be taken as much as desired by a player.

Armored Attack
Leman Russ Squadron
Leman Russ Variant (Specify) Squadron
Super Heavy Tanks (Any)

Artillery
Basilisk & Bombard Artillery Battery
Deathstrike Missile Battery (May never be First Preference)
Manticore Missile Battery

Infantry Fire Support
Griffon Battery
Hellhounds Platoon
Tech Guard Support Platoon

Fast Attack
Bike Squadron
Tech Guard Assault Platoon
Valkyrie Transport Platoon (May never be First Preference)

Scouting
Rough Riders
Sentinels
Single Warhound Scout Titans (have "Scout" Special Ability)


These are just some basic guidelines that I threw together, let me know what you think of them.

_________________
I shot a Deathstrike Missile and destroyed an enemy titan in my pajamas last night. ?How it got into my pajamas I still don't know...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:21 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Quote (Chroma @ 29 Mar. 2006 (20:35))
To me, that looks like at least eight possible variants on this "niche" list, so I think there is definitely room to work.

Oddly, what I have long favored is exactly what you laid out, Semaj.

1) titan list
2) knight list
3) tech guard/ordinatus list

They were all originally thrown together into one "generic" AMTL list because the consensus opinion was that doing them all together stood the best chance of actually getting them into production by SG/GW and that was more important than focus/feel/flavor problems caused by lumping them together.

Personally, I think it's clear that is no longer a relevant argument.  None of it is likely to see the light of day as far as production and all of it is likely to be relegated to semi-official "house rules" status on the SG website.

===

But the real point of the post you quoted was that there is no basis for variant AMTL lists.  There is no "Legio Victorum deviate from AMTL doctrine in ways X, Y, and Z" like there is for SM chapters.  Epic background development is limited to possibly adding or tweaking little bits around the edges of existing background, so we can't just make it up.

Ergo, there are no specific variant titan legion lists to make up.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:24 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 6:38 pm
Posts: 1673
Location: Chattanooga, TN, USA
We can't just make it up?

That's disappointing :(

Et tu, Necrons?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:31 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Blarg:  I like the idea of your titan legion design rules.  It is much along the lines of the 40K marine chapter design, which works well.  I don't know how well it meshes with the original development intents and it would be hard to balance, but it might be a workable way to include more variety in individual legions without trampling on official 40K universe background material.

It is possible that something like that would be acceptable to the powers that be with respect to designing a list.

I think the trick would be in getting the right mix of restrictions.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:59 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:08 pm
Posts: 356
Location: Beavercreek, Ohio, USA
Quote (nealhunt @ 29 Mar. 2006 (16:31))
Blarg: ?I like the idea of your titan legion design rules. ?It is much along the lines of the 40K marine chapter design, which works well. ?I don't know how well it meshes with the original development intents and it would be hard to balance, but it might be a workable way to include more variety in individual legions without trampling on official 40K universe background material.

It is possible that something like that would be acceptable to the powers that be with respect to designing a list.

I think the trick would be in getting the right mix of restrictions.

The rules that I posted would never see the light of a tournament, simply because it would probably allow too much leeway to make a super army.  They were more inteneded to be guidelines for generating new legios for creating army lists.  Once the army list is initially created it would have to be playtested, though I think playtesting on a sister list will go towards playtesting other lists.

So, who would I need to work with to hammer this out, and who would I need to talk to to get it before the powers that be?

_________________
I shot a Deathstrike Missile and destroyed an enemy titan in my pajamas last night. ?How it got into my pajamas I still don't know...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:44 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 6:42 pm
Posts: 3305
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
Quote (semajnollissor @ 29 Mar. 2006 (20:57))
1) Titan heavy AMTL; this could cover:
? ? ? titan heavy legion (min. of 67% titans)

2) Tech Guard heavy AMTG; this could cover:
? ? ? fast attack titan legion (no warlords, Valkyries & Vultures allowed limited numbers)
? ? ? infantry heavy titan legion (up to 1/2 core units may be infantry companies)
? ? ? SHV heavy titan legion (up to 1/2 core units may be equivelant IG SHV companies)

3) Knight heavy AMKH; this could cover:
? ? ? Knight World "titan legion" (lots of knights and infantry w/ limited titans for nobles)

The rest of the lists may be cool, but these are the three traditional (i.e. previously existing) variants. The all-Emperor Titan army will have to excuse itself, the psi titans can be represented by the wide variety of weapons available in the Titan list, and the Xenos legion can be handled in a similar way (at least for the time being).

A while back I suggested that we have a general section at the front of the AMTL list with army background, special rules, unit stats (incl titans, knights, tanks & infantry), titan weapon stats, upgrade stats etc and ten at the back of the AMTL list have a section for army lists with a separate page for each AMTL variant list.

That way we are not having to duplicate stats or repeat sections and can then have a separate 1 page army list for titan heavy legio and knight heavy house.

I would like to see Tech Guard in there but not at the expense of titan heavy/knight heavy lists. This could well be our one chance to get titan variants and knights as an official EA army list, albeit PDF rather than glossy book.

Cheers

James

_________________
My TOEG- Blood Angels and Deathbolts
My Painting Blog- Evil Sunz, Goffs
My Epic trades list


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:27 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 6:38 pm
Posts: 1673
Location: Chattanooga, TN, USA
The biggest problem I see with having a tech guard list is differentiating it from a standard IG list. Aside from the skitari and the ordinatus, there isn't much difference. This is especially true if you consider that a TG themed army would probably not have room for much more than one battle titan in a 2700pt GT battle.

So, how can a TG list be differentiated? Should we throw in the kitchen sink by including all previous vehicles (termites, leviathans, chimeraxes, etc.) plus all forgeworld variants (plasma russ, medusa, stormsword, etc.)? Or should we just play with the formation compositions and only include a limited number of "new" units?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:18 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:08 pm
Posts: 356
Location: Beavercreek, Ohio, USA
Quote (semajnollissor @ 31 Mar. 2006 (13:27))
The biggest problem I see with having a tech guard list is differentiating it from a standard IG list. Aside from the skitari and the ordinatus, there isn't much difference. This is especially true if you consider that a TG themed army would probably not have room for much more than one battle titan in a 2700pt GT battle.

So, how can a TG list be differentiated? Should we throw in the kitchen sink by including all previous vehicles (termites, leviathans, chimeraxes, etc.) plus all forgeworld variants (plasma russ, medusa, stormsword, etc.)? Or should we just play with the formation compositions and only include a limited number of "new" units?

I don't think there should be a Tech Guard army list, simply because I, in my limited exposure to the fluff cranked out by GW hired hacks, don't think there is a such thing as a "Tech Guard" entity.  Yes, there are Tech Guard infantry, we've seen it in previous editions of the game and it stands to logic that the Adeptus Mechanicus would have infantry fulfilling a variety of roles from planetary defense to combined arms assaults in times of war.  But to say that they would be a seperate entity from from the Titan Legions has not been indicated to me.  If anything, I dare say they should not be seperate from the Titan Legions.  The Tech Guard should merely be the name associated with the infantry employed by the AMTL and/or the AM in general.

Which comes to another point I'd like to bring up (again): Where are the Tech Guard Tacticals, Tech Guard Fire Support, and Tech Guard Assault infantry in the AMTL list?  I'm not arguing against the Skitarii, far from it.  I think they, being equivelant to a Veteran Imperial Guardsman as per the Inquisitor article, should be roughly equivelant to Storm Troopers in the IG.  Yes, I know that there is a difference between veteran and elite infantry, but in an operations level game such as Epic I think that those differences can be glossed over.  Make the Skitarii the AMTL version of Stormtroopers and introduce the Tactical, Fire Support, and Assault Tech Guard.

Never mind the discussions about what the fluff indicates (if anything) and whether the AM would go the route of current US armed forces of seperate services, let's posit this question: Is it even worth having a Tech Guard Army List?

Aside from minor differences in stats for the infantry and a little bit better availability of equipment, what tangible difference would there be between a Tech Guard Army and a Steel Legion IG army list?  With all due respect to those advocating, or even discussing, a Tech Guard army list I think that it would be good to drop discussion of it.  If we have a Tech Guard Army list that covers things like you have suggested:

2) Tech Guard heavy AMTG; this could cover:
     fast attack titan legion (no warlords, Valkyries & Vultures allowed limited numbers)
     infantry heavy titan legion (up to 1/2 core units may be infantry companies)
     SHV heavy titan legion (up to 1/2 core units may be equivelant IG SHV companies)


Then it will simply be referred to as "The Tech Guard" (which is a misnomer in my opinion) and the three options of mine that you lopped under that heading will be neutered in differentiation.

Now, Wargame_Insomniac's idea of having a general section of units followed by multiple 1 page Legio army lists has merit.  Not only would we be able to save on duplication of effort, but we would be able to present all of the different variations in a convenient format.

_________________
I shot a Deathstrike Missile and destroyed an enemy titan in my pajamas last night. ?How it got into my pajamas I still don't know...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:11 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Posts: 36984
Location: Ohio - USA
I would think TG/Skitarii should be close to the SM2 Fluff ... that worked for us.  However ... I'm for limiting the TG OOb/TO&E to most of the things the IG gets but no SHTs or FA ... the Titans should have all the firepower you need ...   :;):

_________________
Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 5:49 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 10:11 pm
Posts: 515
Tech guard 'should' be fairly straightforward:

Ordinatus and Warhounds come from the main section of the List. All Knights and Battle Titans come from Support, just like Aircraft.

With 'Tech Guard', note that it's noted in alot of the 'unofficial' works of GW[like Tim Huckleberry's AM lists] that the Tech Guard make use of Rhinos, Land Raiders and those 'sort of things'.

The composition of the list could be quite different, more 'expensive' than the standard IG.

The Knight list shouldn't be hard either, all Tech Guard, Ordinatus, Titans etc come from the 'Allies' section.

That leaves us with three distinctive lists that would be distinctly seperate from the IG list.

Xisor

_________________
"Number 6 calls to you
The Cylon Detector beckons
Your girlfriend is a toaster"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Focus of this list?
PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:43 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
I really like the ideas of different lists for the different TitanLegions. Shouldn't we be able to write our own fluff for the TitanLegions?

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net