Vaaish: I believe the idea is to change it in all lists.

I'd be for an extra point of damage, or maybe just an additional blast marker. Obviously the former is more severe than the latter, but on a lone warhound, that extra BM would result in the titan becoming broken in most cases.

All cases.

How about the attack rips off its head and it walks and fires in a random direction for the rest of the game. May contest objectives but not claim them. Unless it claims them randomly for either side.

No more sarcasm for me, thanks. I'm driving.

The blast marker idea has some merit. "The warhound must lick its wounds somewhere else" rule...

_________________
Let us playtest like the Greeks of old... You know the ones I mean

or a point of extra damage AND a blast marker.

IMO the extra BM would be a boost. I'd far prefer my warhound runs away 60cm behind cover to try and rally than stay in a dangerous position with 2 or less DC remaining and no shields.

_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk
NetEA NetERC Human Lists Chair
NetEA Chaos + Black Legion Champion

I'd support either the titan damage table or something like a crit removes ability to have void shields or -1 to shooting (like s-stompa) or even reduced speed.

_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk
NetEA NetERC Human Lists Chair
NetEA Chaos + Black Legion Champion

I've always played that extra damage caused by critical or other non-shooting effects already does cause extra BM's.

The only occasion that damage doesn't do this is in failed Dangerous Terrain Tests, where the rule takes pains to note that no extra BM's are caused.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter

Agreed.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter

If it get a critical with +1 Pts of damage, It would automatically be 1 Last DC point. I think the extra DC would also mean an extra BM, so your warhound would insta-break and could run to hide anyway.

intact WH without Any VS left takes a hit, critical :

1BM for getting fired upon
1BM for the DC loss
wait, critical !
One more DC lost,
One more BM for this damage.

Result : the warhound is left with one DC and, with 3BM, is broken.

No shields is an interesting option, kinda like the revenant but better as the hound still has RA.

Yes, I realized that was silly adding one more, as as my quick calculation above shows, it would infact have no effect as the warhound is automatically broken by an extra damage anyway. If it wasn't fearless it would infact make the critical an instakill

I was under the impression that the proposal was just to add a BM, not do extra damage.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter

It was, but the counter argument against it (that the extra BM would be a boost, since a broken warhound is free to make a double move) should also apply to case were an extra point of damage is inflicted (since in that case, the warhound also breaks).

i.e. if the arguement is valid for the first case, it is also valid for the second.

For my part, I was merely trying to offer a less severe alternative to the crit causes destruction option.