Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
[List] New WIP list: 5.7 posted http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=5129 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | Chroma [ Tue Dec 13, 2005 2:07 am ] |
Post subject: | [List] New WIP list: 5.7 posted |
Greetings! I've just uploaded WIP5.7 to my webspace for immediate download, enjoy! http://home.cogeco.ca/~kpetker/ Changes: -changed Uncommon Brood spawning cost to "3 pips" -added bio-cannons to Dom and Hydraphant -removed warp blast from Hydraphant -changed Genestealers and Lictors back to CC4+ -used edited ragnarok's flavour text for Synapse Nodes -added bio-weapon stats and alternate model appendices I think that's it. ?Please give it a look over and let me know what you think! |
Author: | ragnarok [ Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:59 am ] |
Post subject: | [List] New WIP list: 5.7 posted |
Just a quick reply. I'll read it in depth later. Uncommon at thre pips. Propably a right choice. I know N0-1 almost died at the easy that my carni brood kept comming back. This way spawning uncomon means you need to use mycetic spores. Screamer killer. 4 attacks 2 MW. Their number of attacks has doubled! I thought we were going to leave their CC alone and give then a low FF to represent the odd spinebank or devourer. Hive tyrants (okay a carry over from last version). They just arn't stabby/shootie enough. Not sure how to deal with this. but they have more attacks than carnies in 40K. possible cataylst +1FF or CC. A3.25. Can I be added? ![]() |
Author: | Markconz [ Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | [List] New WIP list: 5.7 posted |
Yes to the spawning change. Yes to biocannon on dom. What happened with the carni?? Way too overpowered. Ditch the bioplasma, give it 'spine banks 15cm small arms FF6+'. Reduce MW attacks to +1. Tyrant is ok. (They have 1 extra base attack over a carni in 40k but at lower strength, and they can't get as many upgrades as carnis so it balances out). There is also its points to consider - if we boost it we will have to increase points. It does need something in its statline to say it has small arms (maybe just added to VC statline). Ditch the commander ability on lictors ![]() I would like to have a serious playtest of harridans and do something more worthwhile with them... they are too expensive and elite at present I think. |
Author: | Chroma [ Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:47 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | [List] New WIP list: 5.7 posted | ||
Hmmm... an extra attack might have crept onto the Screamer-Killer during editting, but I still think it should be a pure CC beast, like it's 40k counterpart which has no shooting attacks. ?Now that I've worked out the fearless thing with them, they've become a *lot* more useful... and they'll always have a problem with skimmers! ?*laugh* ? Tyrant is ok. (They have 1 extra base attack over a carni in 40k but at lower strength, and they can't get as many upgrades as carnis so it balances out). There is also its points to consider ?- if we boost it we will have to increase points. It does need something in its statline to say it has small arms (maybe just added to VC statline). |
Author: | Chroma [ Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:48 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | [List] New WIP list: 5.7 posted | ||
Sorry ragnarok! I've just been copying that appendix from Maksim's original! I hope I can get added too! *laugh* |
Author: | Chroma [ Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | [List] New WIP list: 5.7 posted |
Oh yeah, one other thing I changed: -bio-plasma breath to 30cm/D3xAA5+ instead of using the template (template stays for ground attack). Using a template for AA is rather fiddly... since all models under the template are hit does that mean ground targets can get hit when it's used for AA and all that bother... I've been following the ATML development of the template into a BP weapon and I'm thinking, once they finalize it, we should look at standardizing the use of the template across lists. |
Author: | Markconz [ Tue Dec 13, 2005 10:35 pm ] | ||||
Post subject: | [List] New WIP list: 5.7 posted | ||||
As long as it has a shooting attack, I don't think it needs to have a secondary small arms attack listed as well... what would it even be? ?I almost feel that the Tyrant needs some kind of FF +1A weapon... Psychic Scream or something. I would like to have a serious playtest of harridans and do something more worthwhile with them... they are too expensive and elite at present I think. |
Author: | Markconz [ Tue Dec 13, 2005 10:52 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | [List] New WIP list: 5.7 posted | ||
Hierophant! Apologies for my brain again - I better have another coffee ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Markconz [ Tue Dec 13, 2005 11:07 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | [List] New WIP list: 5.7 posted | ||
A while ago we discussed giving the bio-titans this ability, and also the 'may move over any terrain without penalty (even impassableterrain)' rule from epic40k for the hierophants. It was met with widespread enthusiam but has since got lost in the mass of posts I think. So yes I agree with Hena that we need this update for the biotitans. |
Author: | ragnarok [ Tue Dec 13, 2005 11:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | [List] New WIP list: 5.7 posted |
[quote="Hena,13 Dec. 2005 (21:43)"][/quote] Zoanthrope. That thing should really have the Agility. |
Author: | Markconz [ Tue Dec 13, 2005 11:12 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | [List] New WIP list: 5.7 posted | ||
Not so - GW will eventually release a standard model which they say will be approximately the same size and type as the previous Hierodule (now called hierophant), so that is what we are working with and should be developing rules for. Aslo if we just give them a rule that they can they can move over any terrain without penalty (which is very nidlike) then we only need to worry about stepping heights etc for the dominatrix and hydraphant. |
Author: | Chroma [ Wed Dec 14, 2005 12:20 am ] | ||
Post subject: | [List] New WIP list: 5.7 posted | ||
Well, I think this might be solved by re-wording agility to be something like "the model may choose to be treated as infantry", then, when a river comes up, a bio-titan can step over it without problem, and when in woods, it can lurk about... That addresses everything except cliffs... how common are 2cm/knee-height cliffs in people's terrain collections? |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |