| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| [Rules] BM idea? http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=5062 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | ragnarok [ Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | [Rules] BM idea? |
I've been thinking that nids not suffering BM is a bit.. well nasty for the opposition. So I was thinking that when they automatically suffer a BM, ie failing an activation roll, rolling a 1 for teleporting, maybe coming undefire, but not for suffering casulties. They suffer a single hit one the majority unit (or weakest armour save if tied). This could represent the whole small ones getting stamped on in the stampeads a hivenode growing though some granite and damaging its hive ganglia ect. |
|
| Author: | ferrumvir [ Mon Oct 24, 2005 10:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | [Rules] BM idea? |
I'd sign up for this for teleporting, but not the rest. I do feel kind of dirty when my opponents points out I need to roll for BM "sorry mate, no point!" The other stuff doesn't need anymore negative effects. IMHO Cheers Scott |
|
| Author: | N0-1_H3r3 [ Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | [Rules] BM idea? |
There were a number of suggestions concerning this on the old board - I know I suggested a rule, as did a couple of others. I'm sure someone could search round and unearth those suggestions. Mine was simply that Tyranids took BMs for anything but casualties, and if it took a number greater than the number of Synapse Creatures present, then the formation would be forced to take a Hold action as its next action, as it regroups and is slowed down/disoriented by the enemy assaults, etc. |
|
| Author: | ragnarok [ Tue Oct 25, 2005 11:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | [Rules] BM idea? |
I take it your idea also has it that they don't take them for coming underfire, NO-1. Otherwise tyrant lead formations would never doing anything of value. Also what would happen to the indepdendant formations that took BMer? |
|
| Author: | N0-1_H3r3 [ Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:38 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | [Rules] BM idea? | ||
Well, my suggestion was made before the Hive Tyrant was made a seperate choice from the Tyranid Warriors. Even then, it was a relatively undeveloped suggestion - the full details hadn't been, and still haven't been, worked out. |
|||
| Author: | ragnarok [ Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | [Rules] BM idea? |
An idea I had today, is that independant broods suffer from BM like normal, possible with ATSKNF. Since 'stealers and 'vores roll Ld tests as normal when out of synpase range in 40K. |
|
| Author: | 2.0 [ Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:32 am ] | ||
| Post subject: | [Rules] BM idea? | ||
stealers don't test in 40k... |
|||
| Author: | ragnarok [ Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | [Rules] BM idea? |
ragnarok An idea I had today, is that independant broods suffer from BM like normal, possible with ATSKNF. Since 'stealers and 'vores roll Ld tests as normal when out of synpase range in 40K. | |
| Author: | 2.0 [ Sat Oct 29, 2005 4:58 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | [Rules] BM idea? | ||
stealers don't test in 40k... | |||
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|