Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
Rules: Initiative & Strategy Rating http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=5058 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | N0-1_H3r3 [ Sun Oct 23, 2005 9:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Rules: Initiative & Strategy Rating |
I think Initiative 1+ is too potent for Tyranids - given that they can't suffer from Blast Markers, it does mean that they'll always pass a first activation, and pass a retained action on a 2+. Making them seem relentless is one thing, making them almost infallable (where activation is concerned) is another. |
Author: | ferrumvir [ Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Rules: Initiative & Strategy Rating |
Hi, At the moment I play without a Supreme Commander (not painted as mentioned else where). Without it, I very rarely risk retaining the initiative. If Initiative was changed to 1+ then I've have almost no incentive to use the dominatrix. I thought a better (more characterful) idea would be (should it need changing) to give Tyranids a +1 initiative if engaging. Sorry Hena, I've not read any of the other thread (not enough lunch hour!), so this may have already been suggested/binned. Cheers Scott |
Author: | nealhunt [ Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:50 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Rules: Initiative & Strategy Rating | ||
Absolutely not. They should never have above a 2+. With no BMs to subtract activation, that's bad enough. Besides, Initiative rating is about far more than just discipline and willingness to follow orders. Obviously, if it were just discipline, Nids would be tops. However, it includes all manner of things outside of that - communication, the ability of the commanders to perceive the battle conditions and issue the correct orders, the ability of the troops receiving the orders to modify them if the conditions warrant, etc.. Tyranids have problems in a lot of those areas. For example, if the SM commander says "take out the bunker on hill 101" and the SMs by 101 see that there is nothing there, they can reasonably be expected to exercise personal initiative and go destroy the bunker on Hill 102 next door. Nids, not so much. If the hive mind misinterprets part of the datastream coming from its basic and possibly confused minions and issues the wrong orders, the Nids wander off to the wrong spot and gaze into their navels (or yolk sacs as the case may be). Likewise, if a SM is temporarily out of communication, he can be expected to survey the situation and take tactical action. The Hive Mind is fluid and can have temporary gaps that are less than the "going to ground" results. In those cases, the swarms simply don't behave in a beneficial matter. Either of those situations would be reflected by rolling a "1" for activation. |
Author: | ragnarok [ Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Rules: Initiative & Strategy Rating |
Yopur lucky Hena. I roll 1s for every thing bar Ld. Then its a double 6. ![]() |
Author: | nealhunt [ Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Rules: Initiative & Strategy Rating |
Since there is no command structure as such and communication is instantenious it should create quite a strong ability to react to whatever happens. |
Author: | Jaldon [ Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Rules: Initiative & Strategy Rating |
(1) The average Tyranid has no personal initiative, and this includes the Synapse Creatures on the battlefield. They are in effect not self aware So while the Nids would have a command structure that would be difficult to directly disrupt, you can also count on the lesser creatures never taking action on their own. They would stand around and look really stupid even if somebody left the door to the command bunker open. (2) There is a definite command chain in the Tyranid Army, it would be impossible for them to function otherwise as the Nid creatures in control would be quickly overloaded with information and unable to react/act. Therefore the lower Synapse Creatures in the comand chain are needed not only to control the lesser brood creatures, but to also disceminate information for the Synapse Creatures above them, otherwise those same creatures would become overwhelmed with information. Think of it this way, if a Norn Queen was able to see everything every Nid creature under her control could see she would be so inundated with useless information as to be incapable of making any kind of decision. Therefore the Synapse Creatures between her and the lesser creatures are needed to 'bleed off' the useless information and only send forward the important information. Then, and only then, can she reach a decision and pass the needed information back down the line. To even make this kind of structure work is going to require at least two more levels of command and control between the Norn Queen and the Synapse Creatures on the battlefield in control of the lesser creatures or information overload would force the system to shut down. It would only take one genetic fault in the eye structure of a synapse creature (like a bolter bolt, though in this case a non-fatal hit) to cause the information to become faulty and cause a halt to activities in an area. Well just my 2 cents anyways..... Jaldon ![]() |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |