| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Flame Template http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=12150 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | pixelgeek [ Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Flame Template |
IIRC Jervis did not include the Flame Template in the new errata. Is that going to change the 8.4 version of the list? |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Flame Template |
Is the flame template nessesary in Epic? |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Flame Template |
I agree that in theory it would be flavourful... but in practice, I have found there to be rules issues (Generally to do with how best to handle multiple template attacks originating from a single formation). |
|
| Author: | Chroma [ Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Flame Template |
*I* like the flame template, but it does seem to cause some confusion when units care multiple "flame" weapons. I hate to see them go, but converting such weapons to BPs might be a better way to go. What are you doing about the Great Unclean One, pg? |
|
| Author: | Markconz [ Wed Mar 26, 2008 5:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Flame Template |
Well if the future is the Jervis main rule variants, then get rid of it I reckon. |
|
| Author: | pixelgeek [ Wed Mar 26, 2008 6:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Flame Template |
(Chroma @ Mar. 25 2008,12:56) QUOTE What are you doing about the Great Unclean One, pg? Well lets not mention it to Jervis shall we :-) |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|