![]() ![]() |
Page 3 of 4 |
[ 50 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next |
The Termagaunt/Hormogaunt/Ravaner Terror |
||||||||
Chroma |
|
|||||||
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm Posts: 9684 Location: Montréal, QC, Canada |
|
|||||||
Top | |
|||||||
![]() |
Markconz |
|
|||||||
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm Posts: 7925 Location: New Zealand |
|
|||||||
Top | |
|||||||
![]() |
ayoras |
|
|||||
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:44 am Posts: 52 |
|
|||||
Top | |
|||||
![]() |
thurse |
|
|||
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 3:13 pm Posts: 185 Location: Dundee, Scotland |
1 vituperator 350 3 tyranid warriors 450 2 tyrant 200 Complete with independants ( stealers, bio titans, lictors ) and you should nearly reach 10 activations, which is a very acceptable number in a 3000-point game. Concerning termagant cost, 15 points without infiltrator is ok for me. Remember that they are FF units, and therefore can support other assaults, and engage more easily. I'm not sure that a T/H Terror with 120 hor/termagaunts (instead of 180) won't be still a very potent army |
ayoras |
|
|||||
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:44 am Posts: 52 |
I think you forgot you must include some broods too ![]() Well I don't understand your point of view, we already discuss about it a lot of times and we totally agreed on this subject. Why you come here to post this? On the termagaunts, I really don't see why they loose infiltrator. One month ago, they had infiltrator, nobody spoke about drop it, nobody spoke about theyr balance. Somebody purposed the 10 pts version which is maybe unbalanced. You test it and you find it is not correct, why you don't go back to the previous version which caused no problem one month ago? I purpose this version of the termagaunts : 10cm -/6+/6+ Brood (4) for 20pts _________________ ![]() |
tneva82 |
|
||||||
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:17 pm Posts: 606 |
|
||||||
Top | |
||||||
![]() |
thurse |
|
||||
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 3:13 pm Posts: 185 Location: Dundee, Scotland |
Well I think we're not very constructive here, and I suggest coming back to the topic, with constructive arguments... The current discussion is pointless as it opposes two points of view : "should armies be balanced in a way they prevent extreme armies to to be overpowered?" Well the answer is YES, and is definitly a part of the philosophy of this game, and one of the reasons I love playing it. Well like it or not, it is a fact and will not be changed. |
tneva82 |
|
||||||
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:17 pm Posts: 606 |
|
||||||
Top | |
||||||
![]() |
tneva82 |
|
||||||
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:17 pm Posts: 606 |
|
||||||
Top | |
||||||
![]() |
Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
![]() ![]() |
Page 3 of 4 |
[ 50 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next |
Who is online |
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |