Hena wrote:
Never mind that same argument could be made on Nercon WEs. Or Dark Eldar WEs. Or LatD WEs ...
Actually, no it couldn't, you seem to be over-simplifying things.
All those armies have had "veiled mentions" of having bigger, war engine-class, units; there is no text that says "These armies have no war engines" in a broad, overarching way... not that LatD are really mention *anywhere* any more... *laugh* If such a direct statement *did* exist for an army/race, then it would be going against background to include made up war engines for them in an EPIC list.
A better example, say focusing on Necrons, would be if, early in development, the Necrons had a "Warp-based" war engine; it doesn't matter if it's tested and balanced, Necron flavour text constantly says that the Warp is anathema to the C'Tan and the Necrons, to include such a war engine would be completely against the background, regardless of game-based merits, and would be better off cut from the list.
To use the old list itself to justify the existence of "A big Harridan" in the current lists is circular reasoning; every other instance of Tyranid background text indicates such a thing does *not* exist, even in a throw-away reference; it's the one place where GW flavour text is remarkably clear and consistent. Many other entries/stories have hints and rumours of "something bigger", but Tyranid flyers top out at "Harridan", full stop, in all GW text.