Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

[BatRep] Termagant Terror Battle 3
Chroma
 Post subject: [BatRep] Termagant Terror Battle 3
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:05 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote (Hena @ 09 Mar. 2006 (19:56))
Perhaps the two warriors are too good of a selection from synapse. I really wouldn't want to up the termagants and making a cap on common brood feels silly.

The thing about the "Common Cap" is that, in a Phase IV army, there *should* be other things than just Common Broods.

The Termagant Terror list is, more likely, a perfect example of a Phase III Attack army, as opposed to a Subdual one.

I think, for what they can do, Termagants are a *steal* at 10 points... I think they were better balanced at 15 a pop.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Chroma
 Post subject: [BatRep] Termagant Terror Battle 3
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:33 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote (Hena @ 09 Mar. 2006 (20:26))
This I might agree. But their engage move is annoyingly slow... oh well. It worked out ok in WIP with 15 points.

That's why you garrison them... all.  *laugh*

Slow or not, you can do a lot with them, and they "project" 30 cm when engaging.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
clausewitz
 Post subject: [BatRep] Termagant Terror Battle 3
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:51 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 916
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
I really think the lessening of Termagants to 10 points and the 100 point twin-warriors has a far more synergistic effect than first realized.  

The thing about the "Common Cap" is that, in a Phase IV army, there *should* be other things than just Common Broods.

I think that the statement about 10 point termagants and 100 point TW formations is indeed the key.

Even with a 50% cap on common broods it possible to create basically the same army.

50% of 2700 is 1350, which is 135 Termangants.
8 2 TW synapse groups is 800.
2 3x Lictor swarms is 300, with 50 for 2 Mycetic Spores.
Which leaves 200 points, which could nicely add a Zoanthrope to every TW formation, eliminating the weakness to aircraft from the list.

The synapse groups need to be somewhat expensive.  Otherwise the Nids can easily maintain a large activation advantage.  Breaking the swarms doesn't stop them from acting.  Nearly wiping them out only delays them for a turn while they spawn.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Markconz
 Post subject: [BatRep] Termagant Terror Battle 3
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:09 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand
I haven't been watching the tyranid development closely for a while, but I know that I argued agaisnt the 10 pt termi whenever it came up. Looks like the two warrior brood is causing major problems as well.

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Chroma
 Post subject: [BatRep] Termagant Terror Battle 3
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:52 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote (clausewitz @ 09 Mar. 2006 (20:51))
The thing about the "Common Cap" is that, in a Phase IV army, there *should* be other things than just Common Broods.

I think that the statement about 10 point termagants and 100 point TW formations is indeed the key.

Even with a 50% cap on common broods it possible to create basically the same army.

Well, I was considering the "Common Cap" in light of Termagants being 15 points and, most likely, no twin-warrior synapse groups.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
clausewitz
 Post subject: [BatRep] Termagant Terror Battle 3
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:27 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 916
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Well, I was considering the "Common Cap" in light of Termagants being 15 points and, most likely, no twin-warrior synapse groups.

Yup, I thought of that...

Came out as..

6x 3 TW synapse groups
90 Termagants
4 Zoanthropes
2x 3 Lictor swarms
2x Mycetic Spores

Certainly less units and activations than the current TT list.  Going by your battle reports is somewhat sounds as though you could have managed with 2 less swarms.  What do you think Chroma?

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Chroma
 Post subject: [BatRep] Termagant Terror Battle 3
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:48 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote (clausewitz @ 09 Mar. 2006 (22:27))
Certainly less units and activations than the current TT list. ?Going by your battle reports is somewhat sounds as though you could have managed with 2 less swarms. ?What do you think Chroma?

I'd say it would make a huge difference as I was having swarms, basically, do nothing but wait around as reserves/guards.  With fewer, they'd all have to work for their meals.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
clausewitz
 Post subject: [BatRep] Termagant Terror Battle 3
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 916
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
I'd say it would make a huge difference as I was having swarms, basically, do nothing but wait around as reserves/guards.  With fewer, they'd all have to work for their meals.

Lol, do the Nids need a couple of extra swarms to act as waiters? :p

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Markconz
 Post subject: [BatRep] Termagant Terror Battle 3
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 12:01 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand
Perhaps we should test that 15 point termi and 3 warrior synapse list? I tested lists that started to approach that several editions ago (I think I used about 60 termis and 20 hormis, 2 x3 lictors, and some biovores). They were still very nasty...




_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Tactica
 Post subject: [BatRep] Termagant Terror Battle 3
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:28 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
Quote (Chroma @ 09 Mar. 2006 (12:04))
Quote (Tactica @ 09 Mar. 2006 (17:54))
Are Tyranid Objectives 1 and 2 too close to the table edges?

Seems like they are closer than 30cm.

Actually, they're right *on* the table edges... the "neutral" edges, as it were. ?The "more that 30cm from edge" only applies to the opponent's table edge, not all table edges... can make for some *very* interesting placements...

(Don't tell me that's a *second* trick I've taught an old dog Tactica... *cough* rally re-roll *cough*)

Well...  :blush: I guess you have... (again)...

I've always read, "opponent's table edge" as any of the edges on the opponent's half of the table.

However, the language is clearly singular not plural in meaning. Heh...  :80:

Better late than never I suppose - thanks again for the wisdom Chroma!  :(8:


_________________
Rob
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Tactica
 Post subject: [BatRep] Termagant Terror Battle 3
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:44 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
I really think the lessening of Termagants to 10 points and the 100 point twin-warriors has a far more synergistic effect than first realized.  

Heck, I was even considering suggesting that, since this is a Phase IV army list, maybe Common Broods should be "A minimum of 25% up to a maximum of 50% of points may be spent on Common Broods" as a solution.


Wow... well, I'm convinced that there's an unexpected problem here.

The list isn't really even fighting - its just barrelling over with an unstoppable tide. Now - part of that is cool from a fluff perspective, but not to the point that it can't be reasonably beat.

1.  10 pnt termigants are too cheap if the common brood type is not going to be limited. Its just for the sheer amount of wounds. So either raise the points an don't apply a limit or leave them at 10 points and impose a common brood limit.

2. My personal feeling on this is similar to Chromas - this is not meant to be an all termigant legal list. The possibility of it wouldn't matter if they weren't breaking the potential wounds in a turn curve. A certain amount of 'other stuff' should be required to some degree to maintain the wound curve if nothing else.

I go back to what I was telling Hena and Jaldon earlier in Hena's bat rep thread - there's an average number of wounds a given average tourny army can yield. I don't know what it is, but when a list goes over 4 times that amount in its army and the game is only 3-4 turns long - you have a problem. Now - combine that with the immunity of breaking, make them immune to blast markers and combat specialists, and also allow them to regurgitate your dead - now you have the makings of a very imbalanced list.

3.  The cheap synapse clearly cause an ability to have more and more activations to spawn more and more of the dead. So there's a mathematical equation to be explored here. As more synapse activations are available, the higher the probability of mass recovery from any given amount of wounds. Therefore, the cheaper the synapse become while remaining unrestricted, the more impervious the list will come to damage.

As noted in the earlier thread, it will be interesting to see what Jaldon thinks of these bat reps.

Cheers,

_________________
Rob
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net