[BetRep] Tyranids vs Armoured Nasties - 3000 |
|
Chroma
|
Post subject: [BetRep] Tyranids vs Armoured Nasties - 3000  Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:40 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
|
|
Oh yeah, one more thing... Raveners are a little too cheap... and should probably be "Brood (2)" units or they're basically a no-brainer to respawn.
_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer
Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Cobalt
|
Post subject: [BetRep] Tyranids vs Armoured Nasties - 3000 Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 11:35 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
 |
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 3:43 pm
Posts: 50
|
|
Hi,
Do you think that having lesser synapse node as a 3 nodes synapse formation at 90 points would change things?
Fon one, you would have much less activations.
On the other hand, even if the ennemy shoots down two of them, they are still fully functionnal...
If wer went this way, maybe we should develop some way to link spawning efficency to the number of synpase creatures still alive? Like a -1 for every destroyed synampse creature in the group?
Just wondering...
_________________
Cobalt
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Cobalt
|
Post subject: [BetRep] Tyranids vs Armoured Nasties - 3000 Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 11:40 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
|
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 3:43 pm
Posts: 50
|
|
Or actually...
The other way round :
When spawning, roll a die for each synapse creature still alive in the synapse group, then keep the higher? Less bookkeeping.
But then what to do with multiple mycetic spores and dominatrix?
Ideas?
Simply instread of keeping the higher, keep the two (or the three) higher rolls?
... this becomes messy...Probably better in the "not so good ideas after all" box
_________________
Cobalt
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Chroma
|
Post subject: [BetRep] Tyranids vs Armoured Nasties - 3000 Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:46 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
|
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
|
| Quote (Cobalt @ 31 Jan. 2006 (10:35)) | | Do you think that having lesser synapse node as a 3 nodes synapse formation at 90 points would change things? |
I just think Lesser Nodes should be 50 point LVs; they're still useful, they're vulnerable to enemy fire, and the 3DC regular Node becomes a bit more attractive.
_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer
Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
