Page 41 of the Eldar rules has a Psycannon listed in the weapon costs table. This should clearly be Psychic Lance. Someone was clearly thinking about Inquisitors when compiling that table
.
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| NetEpic Errata http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=7086 |
Page 11 of 11 |
| Author: | Irisado [ Sat Dec 22, 2012 11:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
I was reading through the NetEpic Gold Chaos army book today, and noticed that the Cauldron of Blood's weapon stats are incorrect in the summary table at the back. It's listed at having 6BPs, when doesn't fire barrage, and the ignore cover rule is missing from the notes. |
|
| Author: | primarch [ Sun Dec 23, 2012 1:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
Hi! Thanks for posting this. Please continue to post as many errors as you can find. Primarch |
|
| Author: | PapaJulietRomeo [ Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
Hi, a couple of questions. Should Scorpion AA Guns in IG list be Inorganic, Robotic, QuickDraw(?) like Tarantulas? Is the comparatively high cost for a Mechanised Tactical Platoon because they can take Chimera variants while the Mechanised Tactical Companies and Battalion/Regimental Commanders can't? If this is the case, perhaps the p27 Mechanised Company listing should add the word Chimera to make '3 Mechanised Chimera Tactical Platoons'? Mechanised Tactical Company = 650 points; Mechanised Tactical Platoon = 300 points; Battalion Commander (same as Mech Tac Plat but with a Major) = 200 points. (My personal opinion is that Chimera family should have a 4+ save rather than 3+. They're a bit too strong at the moment and it seems odd that IG equipment would be better than the SM equivalent.) Thanks for all your work! |
|
| Author: | Irisado [ Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
Page 41 of the Eldar rules has a Psycannon listed in the weapon costs table. This should clearly be Psychic Lance. Someone was clearly thinking about Inquisitors when compiling that table .
|
|
| Author: | Craigm999 [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 3:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
Just printed off the Imperial Guard with Errata doc and noticed a couple of things on the Stats pages at the back; there doesn't seem to be a unit cost for Leman Russ demolishers (also i doesn't look like you could have a company off them - not sure if this is intentional) guessing they are 225 for 3 normally? Also on the stat page for them they are listed simply as 'Demolishers' rather than "Leman Russ xxxx" like the rest of the variants, could be confusing for some punters. Cheers, |
|
| Author: | MagnusIlluminus [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 8:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
The Demolisher has a Support formation. It is three models for 250 points. There is not currently a Company formation that includes the Demolisher, but as they are the same cost as the Executioner you could probably switch them out in the Leman Russ Assault Company with little issue. Just make sure your opponent is fine with the switch. |
|
| Author: | primarch [ Tue Mar 10, 2015 8:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
Hi! I have a person making updated net epic army cards for gold and he is picking up some errata as well. I'm waiting until he is done to update everything. Primarch |
|
| Author: | Craigm999 [ Wed Mar 11, 2015 10:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
Cheers gents! |
|
| Author: | The Bissler [ Wed Mar 11, 2015 12:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
Definitely not acceptable Craig. 
|
|
| Author: | Craigm999 [ Wed Mar 11, 2015 4:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
Ha, i don't even think they are that good, stats wise. i just fancy painting some for an up coming 'urban/cqb' IG force i have in mind... 
|
|
| Author: | The Bissler [ Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
Only kidding, go for it! |
|
| Author: | Kogle [ Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
Post moved to other thread (Sorry) |
|
| Author: | Craigm999 [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
Hi, Quick question that i can't see answered elsewhere regarding IG HQ units... Commissars on bikes/rough riders, do they take the CAF of the mount or of the commissar? e.g. an imperial bike has a CAF of +2, a Commissar (on foot) is +4, so what is a commissar on a bike? Cheers, |
|
| Author: | MagnusIlluminus [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 3:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
Not sure if it's official, but as a rule I've been having the CAF and Weapons be as per the stand regardless of the alternate motive form (IE, Bike, Horse, or Land Speeder). This applies to the Commisar as well as any Special formation that is normally on foot (or transported), but is attached to an appropriate Company: Adeptus Mechanicus, Adeptus Psyker, Astropath, Colonel, Commisar, Confessor, Inquisitor, Major, & Ordo-Malleus Inquisitor. Note that I have not put the Forward Observer into any alternate motive forms, as it would not normally be used alongside a Company formation, thus would not need to have the same motive form. |
|
| Author: | scream [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEpic Errata |
Hi all, In the past we updated Leviathan cost from 350 to 400 points (this was discussed in the Squat Gold List) but this cost modification only appears in the Squat codex with errata and netepic Gold Correction Document. I thought this cost increase was for all Leviathans: Squats, IG & Chaos Iron Warriors. Weren't there too a point about increasing Capitol Imperialis from 450 to 500 as Leviathan cost was increased to 400 ? Volcano In Paris second edition is about in 3 months, if we could get the correction document updated, it would be great 
|
|
| Page 11 of 11 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|