Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
Question about army building http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=25438 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | scream [ Tue Jun 25, 2013 1:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Question about army building |
Hi, Should be an easy question for NetEpic gurus here ![]() For example, in the Adeptus Mechanicus Rule Book, if I want to build a Titan Legion, I have to place at least 75% of my points in "Titan Legions & Standard Adeptus Mechanicus Lists". Does this mean I can pick a Reaver Battle Group as a company card and add up to 5 support cards from both Titan Legion list and Standard Adeptus Mechanicus ? List 1): Company: Reaver Battle Group (TL List) Support #1: Mechanized Tactical Platoon (from Adeptus Mechanicus List) Support #2: Hydra Squadron (from Adeptus Mechanicus List) Or do I have to pick an Adeptus Mechanicus Company Card to pick those support Cards ?: List 2): Company: Reaver Battle Group (TL list) + Company: Tech-Guard Titan Defense Company (AM List) Support #1: Mechanized Tactical Platoon (from AM List) Support #2: Hydra Squadron (from AM List) I'm pretty sure 2) is legal, but I'm not sure 1) is OK. |
Author: | Riquende [ Tue Jun 25, 2013 2:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question about army building |
Weirdly I was looking into this just last night, I came to the conclusion that your 1) would be okay. After all, it would be like me taking my Dark Angels codex list and not being allowed to add a Dreadnought detachment to a Deathwing company card, which would be a bit odd. In fact, it would mean not being allowed to buy teleporters for Deathwing terminators as that's a Special Card from the standard list, not the codex list. |
Author: | Mattman [ Tue Jun 25, 2013 5:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question about army building |
Think 1 is okay. I had a similar question regarding the different lists in the Chaos book if I wanted to take a power based list. The Gold rulebook only makes reference to specific formations supporting a unit of that army when using allies (i.e. no eldar support cards for a space marine company card). Matt |
Author: | ulric [ Tue Jun 25, 2013 5:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question about army building |
I am sure you can ad AM detachments to Reaver battlegroups. |
Author: | primarch [ Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question about army building |
Hi! I see no problem with your army build. Some don't like titan company cards, but they exist for a reason, such as illustrated by scream's original post and question. In a nut shell, its a legal build as far as I can tell. Primarch |
Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 3:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question about army building |
Seems okay to me, too. |
Author: | scream [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:03 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question about army building |
Thanks for your replies ![]() If List 1) is OK (mix AM & TL cards), here is another list example that might cross the line, still following the Titan Legions list creation (75% in TL and AM): Company: Tech-Guard Titan Defense Company (AM List) Support: Warhound (TL List) Support: Warhound (TL List) Support: Warhound (TL List) Support: Warhound (TL List) Support: Warhound (TL List) Special: Warhound (AM List) Company: Warlord Battle Group (TL List) Special: Ordinatus Golgotha (AM List) I suppose that you see the problem: according to the Titan Legions: "75% in Titan Legion and Adeptus Mechanicus Lists", I can mix support and special cards and cancel any restrictions on list creation... |
Author: | Riquende [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question about army building |
I still think that's okay. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |