Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Search found 27047 matches
Search these results:

Author Message

 Forum: NetEpic   Topic: Netepic Background?

 Post subject: Netepic Background?
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 5:49 pm 

Replies: 40
Views: 9779


Hi! Back to your universe. The Eldar make wide use of the webway.  And it is supposed that the Dark Eldar have a city within it.  Is this the case for you? >>The dark eldar don't exsist in netepic. The main problem being lack of suitable miniatures and a good story to add to our our fluff....

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Any other playtester notice this?

Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 1:47 am 

Replies: 31
Views: 7059


Hi! Netepic is correct, in its "golden age" epic was between 12-14%, at least in the US, I used to retail back then so I remember figures from that time well. As time went by it slipped to under 10% (as low as 7% I was told). Epic 40k was supposed to remedy that, in the US they were pitching for a 1...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Any other playtester notice this?

Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 1:47 am 

Replies: 40
Views: 5666


Hi! Netepic is correct, in its "golden age" epic was between 12-14%, at least in the US, I used to retail back then so I remember figures from that time well. As time went by it slipped to under 10% (as low as 7% I was told). Epic 40k was supposed to remedy that, in the US they were pitching for a 1...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Any other playtester notice this?

Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 1:47 am 

Replies: 31
Views: 5872


Hi! Netepic is correct, in its "golden age" epic was between 12-14%, at least in the US, I used to retail back then so I remember figures from that time well. As time went by it slipped to under 10% (as low as 7% I was told). Epic 40k was supposed to remedy that, in the US they were pitching for a 1...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Any other playtester notice this?

Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 1:47 am 

Replies: 31
Views: 6684


Hi! Netepic is correct, in its "golden age" epic was between 12-14%, at least in the US, I used to retail back then so I remember figures from that time well. As time went by it slipped to under 10% (as low as 7% I was told). Epic 40k was supposed to remedy that, in the US they were pitching for a 1...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Gargants and Stompas

 Post subject: Gargants and Stompas
Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 1:47 am 

Replies: 134
Views: 9951


Hi! Netepic is correct, in its "golden age" epic was between 12-14%, at least in the US, I used to retail back then so I remember figures from that time well. As time went by it slipped to under 10% (as low as 7% I was told). Epic 40k was supposed to remedy that, in the US they were pitching for a 1...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Oh No they say he's got to.........

Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 1:47 am 

Replies: 55
Views: 6083


Hi! Netepic is correct, in its "golden age" epic was between 12-14%, at least in the US, I used to retail back then so I remember figures from that time well. As time went by it slipped to under 10% (as low as 7% I was told). Epic 40k was supposed to remedy that, in the US they were pitching for a 1...

 Forum: NetEpic   Topic: Netepic Background?

 Post subject: Netepic Background?
Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 1:21 am 

Replies: 40
Views: 9779


Hi! I like the fluff for the slann/nids/necrons. >>>Glad you liked it! It wasn't gonna be hard for you to give me fluff on the necrons I wouldn't like though, since I cant stand the actual GW explanation.  Ruining everything I used to know and like. The way the Slann are explained makes a link ...

 Forum: NetEpic   Topic: Netepic Background?

 Post subject: Netepic Background?
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2003 1:19 am 

Replies: 40
Views: 9779


Hi! Shadowhunter, net epic does not have blast markers. This is a concept introduced in epic 40k and later. The suppression concept is highly abstracted in net epic/SM and attempts to put it in have not been successful. Basic mechanics dictate what you can put in and what you cant. That particular o...

 Forum: NetEpic   Topic: Netepic Background?

 Post subject: Netepic Background?
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2003 1:07 am 

Replies: 40
Views: 9779


Hi! I understood it was about fluff dafrca, but I wanted to give shadowhunter and others I get description of all systems. Mind you I left out first edition epic, but ATII as it appeared in epic magazine is a LOT like it. The fluff net epic uses, its mostly like GW's althogh that may change as we se...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Any other playtester notice this?

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2003 12:39 am 

Replies: 31
Views: 7059


Hi!

I consider myself properly chastised Maksim. As punishment I will read the epic 40k rulebooks. :p

Just kidding guys  }:)

Primarch

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Any other playtester notice this?

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2003 12:39 am 

Replies: 40
Views: 5666


Hi!

I consider myself properly chastised Maksim. As punishment I will read the epic 40k rulebooks. :p

Just kidding guys  }:)

Primarch

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Any other playtester notice this?

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2003 12:39 am 

Replies: 31
Views: 5872


Hi!

I consider myself properly chastised Maksim. As punishment I will read the epic 40k rulebooks. :p

Just kidding guys  }:)

Primarch

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Any other playtester notice this?

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2003 12:39 am 

Replies: 31
Views: 6684


Hi!

I consider myself properly chastised Maksim. As punishment I will read the epic 40k rulebooks. :p

Just kidding guys  }:)

Primarch

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Gargants and Stompas

 Post subject: Gargants and Stompas
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2003 12:39 am 

Replies: 134
Views: 9951


Hi!

I consider myself properly chastised Maksim. As punishment I will read the epic 40k rulebooks. :p

Just kidding guys  }:)

Primarch
Sort by:  
Page 1800 of 1804 [ Search found 27047 matches ]



Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net