| Author |
Message |
Forum: NetEA Imperial Inquisition Topic: Adeptus Ministorum Orders Militant v1.3 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 11:56 pm
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 70991
|
| Pentients may look like sentinels but they don't do the same thing ingame at all. Penitents are more dreadnought equivilents. Plus as has been stated sentinels are low tech and often found in PDF and civilian usage. Perfect for fraternis militia. Fine, I don't object if you think them required. Yep... |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Emperor's Children Development - Updated List 14 June 2010 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 10:56 pm
|
|
Replies: 143
Views: 12872
|
| Here’s my opinions. I’m afraid I just don’t like some of the changes, sorry. This is sort of to be expected – I made the previous version and I was pretty happy with that so any deviation is not going to be to my taste! If it works for you then more power to you especially if you’re getting serious ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Inquisition Topic: Adeptus Ministorum Orders Militant v1.3 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 10:32 pm
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 70991
|
| To sum up the definite changes so far: Remove Order Famulous Inductions, rename imperial guard company to Fraternis Militia and move to ecclesiarchy section Remove sentinels*, baneblade, thunderbolts, marauders and lunar class cruiser Remove Priest upgrade from Adepta Sororitas Convent Remove faith... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Emperor's Children Development - Updated List 14 June 2010 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:15 pm
|
|
Replies: 143
Views: 12872
|
| There's no real info one way or the other, the only real fluff is on House Devine, which turned traitor and traditionally the Slaanesh daemon engines are limited to the Knights and Scout titan* derived monstrosities as a consequence, but there's nothing really set in stone linking the House to the E... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Emperor's Children Development - Updated List 14 June 2010 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:23 pm
|
|
Replies: 143
Views: 12872
|
| Frogbear - would you care to give a commentary on the changes you made since the last edition and the rationale behind them? |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Inquisition Topic: Adeptus Ministorum Orders Militant v1.3 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:25 pm
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 70991
|
| Canonness: Lost commander and leader to gain Supreme Commander and Faithful . As I included Palatines as a commander , level character it seemed sensible to make the Canoness a supreme commander. Fine, it’ll require some renaming to make the lists match but that’s not a big deal to me. I note, howe... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Inquisition Topic: Adeptus Ministorum Orders Militant v1.3 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:02 am
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 70991
|
| Okay we seem to be getting somewhere. I'm willing to accept retributors as having 2x heavy bolters although I still maintain meltas are more iconic. "Most often used in 40k" is not necessarily the best measure of this. But anyway, I agree. If we can give Dominions effectively fusion gun st... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Inquisition Topic: Adeptus Ministorum Orders Militant v1.3 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:42 pm
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 70991
|
| It's not palatable to me. Dominions are fast moving, anti-tank reaction squads, who are always deployed with transport for mobilty and firing on the move. They don't ever use heavy weapons, because large, cumbersome weapons don't fit with their role as a fast moving reaction force. I'm not willing ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Inquisition Topic: Adeptus Ministorum Orders Militant v1.3 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:18 pm
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 70991
|
| Well, they cant take Multimeltas at all, so it seems a bit silly. Also, 6 was a common number of Dominions, as this is all that can fit inside an Immolator. I realise. It's a fudge - we would be generalising "Dominions" as "close range melta specialists," which is what they are ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Inquisition Topic: Adeptus Ministorum Orders Militant v1.3 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 9:50 pm
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 70991
|
| Okay, so we're at "theoretically possible, but very unlikely given the general antipathy between the organisations". Not, I feel, a good reason to include the units in a pure-Ministorum list. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Inquisition Topic: Adeptus Ministorum Orders Militant v1.3 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 9:44 pm
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 70991
|
| Just as Imperial Guard are explicitly denied warships. Their chains of command cross no more and no less than the Sisters' chains of command cross with the navy. Both are linked through the Departmento Munitorum, and ultimately in any war effort under the warmaster. Anyway, what's the point here? &... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Inquisition Topic: Adeptus Ministorum Orders Militant v1.3 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 9:28 pm
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 70991
|
| Glavian pilot was removed in the last version. VTOL is probably also going to go, but it is actually a GREAT idea, it solves many of my problems with the list (activation spam, aircraft spam, formations of fliers transporting other formations not allowed by the rules, etc) in one stroke of genius. :... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Inquisition Topic: Adeptus Ministorum Orders Militant v1.3 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 9:18 pm
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 70991
|
| Would it be fair to say that there's more of an official formal relationship between them - i.e. that the Guard are transported by the Navy routinely? Yep. If yes, does such a relationship exist between the Navy and the SoBs? It depends. If an Adepta Sororitas force is attached to a battlegroup, th... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Inquisition Topic: Adeptus Ministorum Orders Militant v1.3 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 9:10 pm
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 70991
|
| Yet you're against including dominions, or having the characters do more. There is little more I can do to expand on the sisters without making stuff up, and I'm not keen on doing that unless absolutely neccessary. I didn't complain about your additional characters. I don't know that your change to... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Inquisition Topic: Adeptus Ministorum Orders Militant v1.3 |
| Lord Inquisitor |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:18 pm
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 70991
|
| Naval Spacecraft is flat out wrong Why is it flat out wrong, if the Imperial Guard get Naval Spacecraft, and they aren't allowed Navy Ships in their background just as Sisters aren't allowed Navy Ships? Same rationale for aircraft and Titans. Because, while there was a separation of naval and groun... |
|
|
| Sort by: |