Author |
Message |
Forum: Other Wargames Miniatures Topic: Armiger84's Other Stuff |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Fri May 07, 2021 11:10 pm
|
|
Replies: 3 Views: 9095
|
This'll probably wind up being mostly Shieldbash and Necromunda as I go along. To kick it off, I figured I ought to share the True Atronian warband I finished painting up. These are the same game system as the other "Viking Muppets" Dave's painted up: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51... |
|
 |
Forum: 6mm (and 8mm) Topic: Armiger84's Chaos |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Fri May 07, 2021 9:06 pm
|
|
Replies: 116 Views: 43710
|
Does it count as thread necro when it's your own painting log? So yeah, somewhere last Spring I lost access to my old Flickr account, right around the time they separated from Yahoo, COVID hit, my dog had chronic stomach trouble, my wife changed jobs and we moved... So yeah, suffice it to say, recov... |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Iron Warriors V3.1 (final version) |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:35 am
|
|
Replies: 216 Views: 146084
|
As one of the guys in my gaming group loves to say, trenches are the nicest gift you can give your opponent around your Blitz objective. |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Iron Warriors V3.1 (final version) |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:30 pm
|
|
Replies: 216 Views: 146084
|
Gotcha, I was thinking of IW from the lore, so trenches and razor wire not static defenses like a bunker or large buildings. This way there can be a garrison of infantry to support the ordnance. I totally understand that approach, and it does sound and feel totally thematic too - but the list, as d... |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Iron Warriors V3.1 (final version) |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:04 pm
|
|
Replies: 216 Views: 146084
|
Would it be possible to add additional fortified positions to the IW Force list? For example, allow a retinue to purchase trenches, and bunkers in addition to the Gun Emplacement currently available. I bring this addendum up because the Gun Emplacement can only be purchased for each armored vehicle... |
|
 |
Forum: 6mm (and 8mm) Topic: Watching Paint Dry 11: Back in Action |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 4:50 pm
|
|
Replies: 67 Views: 15579
|
Well, at least these things can't spawn Wraithlords & Wraithguard...
Conversions look great! |
|
 |
Forum: 6mm (and 8mm) Topic: Armiger84's Chaos |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2020 12:09 am
|
|
Replies: 116 Views: 43710
|
Lextar wrote: Wow those are impressive. Also where did you get the backdrop?
Hey sorry, meant to respond sooner. The backdrop is the inside cover of the Forgeworld Red Books for the Horus Heresy (rulebook, core Astartes army list, Legions army list). Great ruined city backdrop  |
|
 |
Forum: 6mm (and 8mm) Topic: Armiger84's Chaos |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2020 9:27 pm
|
|
Replies: 116 Views: 43710
|
Painting log catch-up time! Big army photo (This was circa late February. New Warlord!): https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49530226303_b6ebe11cda_z.jpg Mid-April additions: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49777199906_c5b11e998a_z.jpg The four new titans, with all kinds of cool filters on them:... |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Iron Warriors 3.2 Proposed Playtest Changes |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 4:17 pm
|
|
Replies: 9 Views: 6203
|
Ok, the first battle report of my own is up - Iron Warriors v3.2a vs. Minervans (3000pts): http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=34188 My opponent shorted himself by 100 points, but in all honesty, with the way I rolled in on him, that might have made the difference between... |
|
 |
Forum: EA Battle Reports Topic: Iron Warriors v3.2 (playtest) vs. MInervans (3000pts) |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 4:02 pm
|
|
Replies: 3 Views: 3338
|
Bringing this writeup over from my blog now that Taccoms is back up. This is the first of several battle reports aimed at exploring potential tweaks to the Iron Warriors v3.1 approved list. The playtest changes can be found here: http://www.taccmd.tacticalwargames.net/viewtopic.php?f=82&t=34161 ... |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Iron Warriors 3.2 Proposed Playtest Changes |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:50 am
|
|
Replies: 9 Views: 6203
|
So, I’m simply wondering. Why push to approve a list, and then as soon as that goes through, turn to feedback and immediately start to tweak it? Are lists being put up for approval deliberately made a bit weak in hopes of getting it through easier , only to then end up with a competitively poor ver... |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Iron Warriors V3.1 (final version) |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 6:47 pm
|
|
Replies: 216 Views: 146084
|
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Iron Warriors 3.2 Proposed Playtest Changes |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 6:46 pm
|
|
Replies: 9 Views: 6203
|
First off, a huge thanks to everyone who's helped get the Iron Warriors v3.1 list approved (especially Onyx)! That was a long time in coming, and I'm glad the list has made it to Approved status. However, between playtesting both official and unrecorded, a bit of soul-searching, and a healthy dose o... |
|
 |
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: ERC Chair and TECS |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:35 am
|
|
Replies: 5 Views: 4872
|
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Iron Warriors V3.1 (final version) |
Armiger84 |
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2019 6:59 pm
|
|
Replies: 216 Views: 146084
|
Looking forward to the draft. Poking my head back in after some prodding from Dave to let folks know I'm not dead and that the v3.2 playtest changes are coming. I've just been quiet due to a combination of work priorities, collecting a little more input, and putting together a playtest document. An... |
|
 |
Sort by: |