| Author |
Message |
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Space Wolves 3.0 Approved |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 10:34 am
|
|
Replies: 63
Views: 38357
|
| Well I try to consider your proposals but you do sound like the "old AC that will never be happy" some of the times. So, should I be dismissed out of hand? There's a reason I sound unhappy way btw - I'm very passionate about the list. I put in a lot of work and effort getting it to where ... |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Space Wolves 3.0 Approved |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 2:26 pm
|
|
Replies: 63
Views: 38357
|
| Yeah, but so far my feedback hasn't really, by some, been taken into account on the basis of "Oh you're the old sub-AC you'll never be happy," so I'm a little hesitant about providing feedback because, well, my view apparently is "tainted." Anyway, here's my feedback. Changing th... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Space Wolves 3.0 Approved |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 10:46 am
|
|
Replies: 63
Views: 38357
|
| Made some "small" changes to the playtest version. Removed some of the options on the Great Company, so now it can only take Gray Hunters if it wants more marines. Never really liked the mixed formation and the only upgrade I ever took was the Bloodclaws since they were cheaper. Also I fi... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: Tau Xar'Ka Armoured Strike List (Experimental) |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2016 4:55 am
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 14640
|
| As a general point following our recent game I looked up the discussion about allocating disrupt, lance, . . . all but MW. The official position is that the defender allocates the hits and therefore the (read as written) expectation is that they will be allocated to minimise the effects. This makes... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: Tau Xar'Ka Armoured Strike List (Experimental) |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 4:23 am
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 14640
|
Just realized I have left the Seeker missile off the Rail Gun Hammerhead.
Apologies to those who have downloaded this list already. |
|
|
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Supplements Topic: Supplements Update 2016-04-13 |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 10:02 am
|
|
Replies: 9
Views: 8037
|
| PFE I have all the stuff I was going to put in the Epic: Nemesis book if you want it - including all the Stugmeister artwork and all the other stuff people agreed to. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: Tau Xar'Ka Armoured Strike List (Experimental) |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 4:47 am
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 14640
|
| Have updated the typos and made a couple of minor changes for errors and naming conventions etc |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: Tau Fio'Ka - SUPERSEDED BY XAR'KA list |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 4:39 am
|
|
Replies: 110
Views: 31797
|
| Can someone please unsticky this topic? Doesn't let me do it. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: Tau Xar'Ka Armoured Strike List (Experimental) |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 11:51 pm
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 14640
|
| Ethereal, think a 75 point upgrade for this is rather high. All the other lists have them for 50 points. And the Vior’la list has inspiring as well for the lower price. You can still only put him on a Fire Warrior unit, as opposed to in a tank for example, so not much more resilient. Ah! Missed tha... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: Tau Xar'Ka Armoured Strike List (Experimental) |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 4:49 am
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 14640
|
| Crap! Spotted a cut and paste typo. Forgot to take out the (Small arms) MW from the Hammerhead Fusion cannon. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: Tau Xar'Ka Armoured Strike List (Experimental) |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 3:00 am
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 14640
|
The renamed and rejigged Armoured Strike force list.
This follows on from the original (and incorrectly named) Fio'Ka list.
As you will see there are quite a few changes to this new list compared with the old Fio'Ka list and these are for various reasons.
v1.0 date: 8/4/16
v1.0.1 date 13/4/16 |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: Tau Fio'Ka - SUPERSEDED BY XAR'KA list |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 2:58 am
|
|
Replies: 110
Views: 31797
|
| MW piranhas seem a bit rubbish but maybe just because I can't help comparing them to smurf scouting ATSKNF 4+ armour landspeeders. :D Maybe you're right but I'd like to trial the unit and see how it works out. Carrying a ML on a Tetra in the formation (+1 for ML = MW4+, giving -1 save on crossfire)... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: Tau Fio'Ka - SUPERSEDED BY XAR'KA list |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 2:37 am
|
|
Replies: 110
Views: 31797
|
| Just been having a think about the Mech Cadre. Am contemplating reducing the Mech size and cost to make it more affordable but more customizable with upgrades. eg 2xHH, 1xSR, 4xFW, 2xDF for 325 points. Upgrades would be extra HHs and extra FW+DF Any thoughts? Also the name for the list will be chang... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: Tau Army List vs 6.8 (Approved) |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:32 pm
|
|
Replies: 117
Views: 98037
|
| Great, thanks for the reply Yme, though would reintroducing the Smart missiles to the tank list require a points bump? |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Squats Topic: Squats: Thurgrimm Stronghold v1.51 |
| Dobbsy |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 6:48 am
|
|
Replies: 83
Views: 42085
|
| Elsaurio, I'm just trying to get my head around why the Spotter rule is necessary. Is Indirect Fire not enough to hit long range targets? Is the reason based around Squat movement deficiency that they should get to move while IF'ing? I know the old SM Squat list used a spotter so is it a historical ... |
|
|
| Sort by: |