| Author |
Message |
Forum: EA Battle Reports Topic: Gargants v1.02 vs LatD (REDUX) v0.3 |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 5:26 pm
|
|
Replies: 9
Views: 3330
|
| Gargant Gargant Supa Stompa Supa Stompa Supa Stompa Supa Stompa Fightas 4x extra armer upgrades and 50 point left for other upgrades This has the possibility of 6 near Gargant class titans being on the table with all having Gargant class weaponry. The only solutions I can think of other than the +1D... |
|
 |
Forum: EA Battle Reports Topic: Gargants v1.02 vs LatD (REDUX) v0.3 |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2019 5:46 pm
|
|
Replies: 9
Views: 3330
|
| Very enjoyable game, I can see this being a popular army at events. I do agree with Simon on the "extra armer" upgrade. d3 extra DC feels too good for 75 points as along with the extra DC and survivability it brings you also get a unit that is harder to break and gains assault/support bonu... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Overwatched air assault BM allocation |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 11:09 pm
|
|
Replies: 9
Views: 3577
|
| Rules question from a tournament game this Saturday: –Landa with mob air assaults marine scouts on overwatch (taking AP and AT shots due to razorback, so both the boyz and the lander are allocated hits). –Orks take a BM from coming under fire from overwatch, but are counted as 1 formation for the a... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Supporting Fire in an Assault |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 4:02 pm
|
|
Replies: 10
Views: 3916
|
ffoley wrote: you don't need LOS to the unit that breaks though
Misread the post , realised you were stating you do not have to have a LOS to your own formation if it loses an engagement to receive a BM. |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Supporting Fire in an Assault |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:31 pm
|
|
Replies: 10
Views: 3916
|
| the rule is clear enough I guess but it doesn't follow its own design notes where it says "these Blast markers represent the detrimental effect on morale of seeing friends defeated in an assault." because the rule doesn't require the supporting unit to have any LOS to the defeated target ... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Supporting Fire in an Assault |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2019 8:35 pm
|
|
Replies: 10
Views: 3916
|
| The rule your looking for is 1.12.8, highlighted relevant parts. 1.12.8 Loser Withdraws After the result of the combat has been worked out (either because all defending units were destroyed, or the attack stalled, or through a result roll), then the loser is broken and must withdraw , and formations... |
|
|
Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups Topic: Full Scale Assault February 23rd Daventry |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:45 pm
|
|
Replies: 50
Views: 15264
|
The moment you realise your opponent has put most of their army under your Orbital Barrage
Attachment:
tumblr_p3w33uI9511sxouzno1_400.gif [ 1.94 MiB | Viewed 2173 times ]
|
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Rule Q - Multiple Daemon summoning and Commander ability |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2019 4:43 pm
|
|
Replies: 3
Views: 2295
|
| Hello, I have a question regarding the correct order for summoning daemons with multiple summoning units when using the commander ability. As per the Chaos rules, daemon summoning is done when selecting a unit, before activation roll is made. With the commander rule therefore, would the correct ord... |
|
|
Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups Topic: Epic UK Adeptus Titanicus (2018) Codex |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2019 10:59 am
|
|
Replies: 24
Views: 8131
|
| Advice please - what do people think is the best close combat weapon for a long range Blitzguard Reaver? I'm torn between the +3 MW Chainfist or the +2 TK(D3) Powerfist. I'll probably paint them up before testing them out. I'd recommend the Powerfist as ,for me, it would be a bit more of a deterren... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Orks Topic: Push to complete a Gargant list - 2019 |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2019 10:49 am
|
|
Replies: 65
Views: 48155
|
| That said, I'd be quite happy to see a single really long-range, or solid indirect fire option available.something like that in limited quantities (perhaps available at one per Gargant) opens up a few choices on how to play rather than simply slapping more flyers onto a problem which, for me, makes... |
|
|
Forum: Adeptus Titanicus (2018) Topic: Photographs for EUK codex |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:50 pm
|
|
Replies: 8
Views: 6938
|
All of mine, apart from 1 warlord, are painted and based. I will be taking them next Thursday to a gaming night in Derby.
If Steve, Simon, Mike or any of the others who may be coming can bring a decent camera they can take the pictures you need.
Hopefully they are up to a standard you can use. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: NetEA Blood Angels V3.0 list |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 11:22 pm
|
|
Replies: 91
Views: 37859
|
| Dave took EpicUK world eaters, something like Retinue - Warlord, pact, 2 destroyers Retinue - pact, 2 destroyers Retinue - pact, 2 destroyers Retinue - pact (dreadclaws), 2 destroyers Terminators - pact Hellcannons Lord of battle Spaceship Hellblades hellblades Having looked I just realised he has ... |
|
|
Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups Topic: UK Teams for Glasgow 2019 |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 6:38 pm
|
|
Replies: 24
Views: 6335
|
StevekCole wrote: There will be a Scotland team. There may even be a second Scotland team.
If Scotland is having its own team are other English Counties going to be allowed their own teams too.
 |
|
|
Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups Topic: Epic UK GT 2018 November 24-25 Daventry |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 2:31 pm
|
|
Replies: 68
Views: 14766
|
| I think we have around 12 signed up so far , Steve54 is very busy at the moment but will probably update the original post with entrants deails when he gets the chance. |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Epic UK Dark Eldar |
| dptdexys |
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2018 10:03 pm
|
|
Replies: 31
Views: 8318
|
| On a related note, can a unit placed in the webway still teleport instead if they have the ability? See faq , I'd say it would be the same for other armies like necron and Dark Eldar Q: When do I decide what method Eldar reserve formations will use to enter play? A: In the GT scenario reserve forma... |
|
|
| Sort by: |