Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Search found 390 matches
Search these results:

Author Message

 Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups   Topic: Accessible Epic to boost community and event attendance

 Post subject: Re: Accessible Epic
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 5:31 pm 

Replies: 43
Views: 5214


yeah inf shooting always is quite poor. give him a heavy bolter and or a price reduction perhaps

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: New Army Champion, new approach?

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:23 pm 

Replies: 23
Views: 4068


There is nothing wrong with a 4 strong bike unit - I guess priced at 175 (same as assault marines) but some people would query the value in having a separate list for such a minor change from codex marines. Some people might also think that 5 bikes for 200 is better value and so stick to using codex...

 Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups   Topic: Accessible Epic to boost community and event attendance

 Post subject: Re: Accessible Epic
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:02 pm 

Replies: 43
Views: 5214


I think GW should have made Tacs FF 3+, and devs FF 4+. Tacs should be the FF masters - the special ops guys that kick the most ass out of a drop pod with bolters blazing, flamers. melta etc. That way each has a specialism, The devs do the longer ranged shooting. Anyway, I noticed people (e.g. club ...

 Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups   Topic: Accessible Epic to boost community and event attendance

 Post subject: Re: Accessible Epic
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 12:47 pm 

Replies: 43
Views: 5214


Wouldn't a better solution to this theoretical problem be for experienced players to moderate their behaviour. I mean if a noob with 2nd edition plastic in sub-optimal fully upgraded per the fluff formations wants to play you choose something similarly woeful, rather than tabling them 5-0 with your ...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: New Army Champion, new approach?

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:11 am 

Replies: 23
Views: 4068


I agree with Kyrt. I painted up a 3k army of WS and played with them a few times but would never bother again. I'd use codex marines or dark angels. Shame that GW missed an opportunity to make this an interesting thematic army and an even bigger shame that it hasn't been widely acknowledged and rect...

 Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups   Topic: Titan Vs Goliath - 20/01/18 - BOTH LISTS ON PAGE 3

 Post subject: Re: Titan Vs Goliath
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 2:24 pm 

Replies: 52
Views: 6666


This is more of a use what you've got (not strict army lists), emphasis on big WE, wheatons law type of game

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Air assaulting into a second formation's ZOC?

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 11:50 am 

Replies: 16
Views: 3129


Here's my take on the OP's question: Its a universally applied rule that you cannot engage one formation and enter the ZOC of another unless: * You call intermingling * You can apply the "scouting from behind rule" In the OP situation regarding a bunch of titans, neither exception applies ...

 Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard   Topic: NetEA Steel Legion - proposed update

Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 4:14 pm 

Replies: 43
Views: 11488


Is a mini update with those changes going to get accepted so easily? Steve54, Onyx, Kyuss and Largo were quite opposed previously.

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Aerospace rules questions

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 10:25 am 

Replies: 26
Views: 4442


Yeah sorry I kind of meant more that it should be -1 because the optics on it don't look good, I mean a bomber chasing after a bunch of fighters, landing on the floor next to them and shooting up at them without penalty seems wrong. I assume the -1 on normal flak is to represent the difficulty of th...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Aerospace rules questions

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 9:26 am 

Replies: 26
Views: 4442


yeah that example is the reason why -1 makes sense

 Forum: NetEA Squats   Topic: Squats in Minigeddon

 Post subject: Re: Squats in Minigeddon
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2017 10:34 am 

Replies: 4
Views: 3307


The 1.6.1 list allows only 2 support formations which restricts things a bit for minigeddon. I think an Overlord would be very good and the biker squad for cheaper access to a supreme commander. You need at least one brotherhood and so those 3 formations come to 725. You' could then only get another...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Aerospace rules questions

Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:10 pm 

Replies: 26
Views: 4442


unless they actually did take a move action (e.g. landed aircraft takes an engage action during the turn)

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Aerospace rules questions

Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2017 10:17 am 

Replies: 26
Views: 4442


I recall Ginger saying that an approach move doesn't count as a move for the purposes of triggering overwatch (although the disembarking of transported units does).

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Aerospace rules questions

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 3:07 pm 

Replies: 26
Views: 4442


I thought airborn aircraft that have made an approach move can fire defensively against enemy aircraft making an approach move past them and regardless of whether the enamy aircraft are making a ground attack or intercept. Having looked at the rules its quite unclear to me now. So interceptors can't...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Question: Black Legion (etc.) and sacrifice -rule

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:01 pm 

Replies: 12
Views: 2370


I assumed for EpicUK it did cause a BM - not that I have ever payed with or against a GD
Sort by:  
Page 5 of 26 [ Search found 390 matches ]



Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net