Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Search found 4347 matches
Search these results:

Author Message

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Dark Angels v1.2 The long slog to NetEA

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 4:18 am 

Replies: 111
Views: 17490


Of course, another simple option is to just add only 1 unit with the Chapter Master bringing the total to 5 units. It keeps the ATSKNF BM issue to as much of a minimum for an upgrade as possible., while still increasing the unit strength.

 Forum: NetEA Tau   Topic: Tau Fio'Ka - SUPERSEDED BY XAR'KA list

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:30 am 

Replies: 110
Views: 20443


Here's what I'm considering for change for version 0.4: List Added HH upgrade to Mech Formation Changed Mech to 2 HH, 1 SkyRay, 6 FW+Devilfish Removed the Gun Drone upgrade from the Mech FM Recon Cadre changed to 5 Tetras Recon Cadre price changed to 150 Piranha upgrade to replace any Tetra with a P...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Dark Angels v1.2 The long slog to NetEA

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:50 am 

Replies: 111
Views: 17490


yeah it's not undoable and also could be balanced by making them a larger points sink in the list such as if present requiring the chapter master ch then to be added there. It might be powerful but it can't be everywhere and expensive enough that you can't go crazy without having too few activation...

 Forum: NetEA Tau   Topic: Tau Army List vs 6.8 (Approved)

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:06 am 

Replies: 108
Views: 37801


Sorry Yme - at work and rushing through so TL;DR - but does the Railhead have no Smart missile system for any reason or is it a typo? Seems odd all other Heads get it but the Rail. Otherwise should the points be adjusted back to match the other tanks given it's missing a weapon system?

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Dark Angels v1.2 The long slog to NetEA

Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 1:56 am 

Replies: 111
Views: 17490


Actually I think the Deathwing should stay 4-6 units for a couple of reasons. 1/ It's thematic 2/ You have no Titan allies so a beefed up DW formation replaces this option and the high points cost is the trade off. It's a tough nut to crack but still doable. If there's arguments about them being too...

 Forum: NetEA Tau   Topic: Tau Fio'Ka - SUPERSEDED BY XAR'KA list

Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 1:14 am 

Replies: 110
Views: 20443


Will sort something out this week Fudd. I need to access a different PC to amend the file I have as my current one only has a cut down version of Word which doesn't support all features I used in the original file.

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Dark Angels v1.2 The long slog to NetEA

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 12:40 pm 

Replies: 111
Views: 17490


Did people not read the part when Mard says "This is a starting point?" :D This isn't an approved list - it's not even a Developmental list. I'm always confused how an experimental list seems to receive an angry "OMFG this list is broken!" response. Of course it is. It's 1.0 of a...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Dark Angels v1.2 The long slog to NetEA

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 5:37 am 

Replies: 111
Views: 17490


Hi Mard. Good to see new life in the list :) I had a quick perusal and came up with some Qs and typos. There's a typo in the Landing Craft speed - "bo,ber Is there a reason the Black Knights are considered LV instead of bike? Seems odd. The Mortis Dread leaves something to be desired and seems ...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Space Wolves 3.0 Approved

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 11:23 pm 

Replies: 63
Views: 22489


Ok, another point we disagree on :) Yep. Seems there'll be a lot as you have your view and I've made my points so I'll move on and save us the usual time-intensive circular arguments here on Taccomms. ;) Cheers So tou don't think it's productive to answer UvenLords question about thoose situation w...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Space Wolves 3.0 Approved

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:16 am 

Replies: 63
Views: 22489


uvenlord wrote:
Ok, another point we disagree on :)

Yep. Seems there'll be a lot as you have your view and I've made my points so I'll move on and save us the usual time-intensive circular arguments here on Taccomms. ;)

Cheers

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Space Wolves 3.0 Approved

Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2016 10:54 pm 

Replies: 63
Views: 22489


Perhaps you misread my post? This is about rallying not activating. How would engaging make this less of an issue. Usually I engage, get a couple of blastmarkers, then rally. No no, I understood what you meant, I just meant less of an issue overall , but these guys are supposed to be harder to cont...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Space Wolves 3.0 Approved

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 3:36 am 

Replies: 63
Views: 22489


Basically I have been underestimating the effect of unbloodied when I have been playtesting in friendly games. In competitive games I found that rallying on 3+ or 5+ is a bigger drawback for a assault oriented formation then I have foreseen. Working as intended then. Lower pricing is the trade off ...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Scions of Iron, v1.5

 Post subject: Re: Scions of Iron, v1.5
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 1:19 am 

Replies: 68
Views: 8250


I do like your First Strike idea though. This came up in discussion in the Scythes list.

 Forum: NetEA Tau   Topic: Tau Fio'Ka - SUPERSEDED BY XAR'KA list

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:58 pm 

Replies: 110
Views: 20443


My point was that Pathfinders at least have their own vehicles (in the standard list), so mechanised to an extent. Yeah no worries. I'm going to leave them as Tetras for the moment though to keep with the theme. We can adjust if there's a real shortfall for ML in future versions. Sorry that (infant...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Scions of Iron, v1.5

 Post subject: Re: Scions of Iron, v1.5
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:47 pm 

Replies: 68
Views: 8250


The LS Storm is also in the Scythes list I wrote up if you're looking for an option - there was even discussion about what to do with them.
Sort by:  
Page 3 of 290 [ Search found 4347 matches ]



Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net