| Author |
Message |
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: FAQ update |
| D_Arquebus |
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2019 2:58 am
|
|
Replies: 17
Views: 22160
|
| See I don't feel that is an FAQ, but rather a house rule or an errata. As by the rules: You cannot 'pass' on an activation (1.6.1) You must move to get back into a legal formation if you are not when you activate, and thus cannot use the Overwatch activation at all (1.6.1) You must either charge the... |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Any updates on additions of Admech or Knight faction lists |
| D_Arquebus |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 6:31 am
|
|
Replies: 24
Views: 33893
|
| Thanks for the feedback Dave :) . Just have some questions as I try to understand the approval process beyond what is in the CRaP document. That the feedback provided and changes suggested would be incorporated after the approval. So you are suggesting they gave approval for the list as it is, but w... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: NetEA Battle Reports Standards? |
| D_Arquebus |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 4:19 am
|
|
Replies: 2
Views: 5379
|
| Hoping to confirm if there is a listing of the comprehensive details the ERC and ACs are looking for in battle reports please? Obviously: Armies involved Result Preferably or mandatory for opposition to be from approved lists? Army lists used? Is there any review of the 'control' lists build - i.e. ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Any updates on additions of Admech or Knight faction lists |
| D_Arquebus |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 4:07 am
|
|
Replies: 24
Views: 33893
|
"...optimism that things would change after approval."
I'm curious what you mean here please Dave? I would assume that after approval the lost is locked and not subject to change? |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Any updates on additions of Admech or Knight faction lists |
| D_Arquebus |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 4:00 am
|
|
Replies: 24
Views: 33893
|
| Is it normal to not get feedback from ERC re why a list is not going to be approved? It would seem to make sense as otherwise the there is no way forward? I have no specific feedback at this point. The general feedback I received from the initial skitarii submission has been integrated or was unacti... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: NetEA vs Localised Epic Lists? |
| D_Arquebus |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 3:36 am
|
|
Replies: 3
Views: 4985
|
| Curious to know who are the Epic Uk team? I understand there is a website, but can see little information on there about list design, rules amendments etc? http://epic-uk.co.uk/wp/ Curious to know how/ why a seemingly duplicate set of lists was developed for the ones already existing in NetEA? Presu... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Any updates on additions of Admech or Knight faction lists |
| D_Arquebus |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 3:12 am
|
|
Replies: 24
Views: 33893
|
| It was submitted, stuck at 2:1 for approving it and currently has no path forward to flip the third vote since there's only three members on the ERC now and lists require three yes votes to approve. Hello Vaaish, I was wondering if there was an official channel of feedback about what exactly the is... |
|
|
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: FAQ update |
| D_Arquebus |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 3:07 am
|
|
Replies: 17
Views: 22160
|
| I discussed the countercharging stuff with dptdexys, MikeT, and Steve54 last week, I'm pretty sure that the EpicUK approach going forward will be that war engines are not permitted to countercharge if enemy units are in BTB contact. The intention is to follow the rules as written, even if it can le... |
|
|
| Sort by: |