| Author |
Message |
Forum: NetEA Necrons Topic: Necron 4.2 - comments |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:48 pm
|
|
Replies: 247
Views: 38266
|
| I haven't been able to play with or against necrons but I think you guys may be a little too close. 4.2 seems to really have brought the necrons in line. They are expensive and a lot of the formations don't exactly wow or pay through the nose for it if they do. I would tone destroyers down a little(... |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard Topic: Hellhounds poll and review |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:55 pm
|
|
Replies: 23
Views: 5558
|
| I struggle to justify taking them over leman russ at the moment. Maybe try them at 100pts? I believe this is too low but i'm not sure by how much. If other 25pt options will be added then perhaps 125 would be a good price for them? |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard Topic: Rough Riders poll and review |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:53 pm
|
|
Replies: 15
Views: 3617
|
| I don't know that i'd still use them if they were toned down significantly. They are not exactly overpowered now- just nasty. Maybe lose the armour save but other than that I think any other change would need to be accompanied with a price cut. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard Topic: Sentinels poll and review |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:49 pm
|
|
Replies: 25
Views: 4994
|
I think that lascannons are slightly better however I don't know if they're good enough to justify paying points for them.
Although I like the idea of lascannon sentinels I don't have a problem with the current rules.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard Topic: Thunderbolts poll and review |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:45 pm
|
|
Replies: 12
Views: 3246
|
| Thunderbolts are great as it is. The small formation size is justified by the background that the navy took a severe pounding early on in the battle for Armageddon. Also from a rules point of view a larger formation would make them extremely powerful and considering you'd presumably get four for the... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard Topic: Armoured Regiment 1.4 |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:45 am
|
|
Replies: 83
Views: 14351
|
| (Evil and Chaos @ Jun. 19 2007,23:22)QUOTE (Soren @ Jun. 19 2007,19:44)QUOTEI don?t know if this was already stated here, but why are 6 (+1) Salamander Scout 400 when I can get 3 of them for 100. Even if they are a company, for only 100 more I get a SHT-company. It's a mistake. so waht are the thou... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard Topic: Armoured Regiment 1.4 |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:15 pm
|
|
Replies: 83
Views: 14351
|
| (Evil and Chaos @ Jun. 19 2007,13:55)QUOTE QUOTEAnd on the issue of titans I think it is a good idea having as options the titan packs produced by FW. FW is the only way we will new Epic stuff released in new future. So think it is good that new lists will fetaure FW packs. Perhaps I should peel of... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard Topic: Armoured Regiment 1.4 |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:09 pm
|
|
Replies: 83
Views: 14351
|
| (Reaver @ Jun. 15 2007,16:03)QUOTEJust to get back to the Stormtroopers / Vultures thing for a moment. I can understand the whole combined arms thing, but given they aren't part of an Armoured Regiment it seems wrong to me to put them in the main list. So how about making them a choice from the 1/3... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Epic Competition for new supplement |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 8:29 pm
|
|
Replies: 75
Views: 15951
|
| Groovy. Just let me know. |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Epic Competition for new supplement |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 1:05 am
|
|
Replies: 75
Views: 15951
|
I'd quite like to do some fiction, probably in the form of a short story(possibly plural).
Is that something you guys might be interested in? |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard Topic: Armoured Regiment 1.4 |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:05 am
|
|
Replies: 83
Views: 14351
|
| More thoughts on the thunderer- make it FF5+. This could be justified by it losing sponsons and would make their short range more of a disadvantage. I think this might actually tip things for me although with reinforced armour they would still be quite nasty in an assault. My other idea would just b... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard Topic: Armoured Regiment 1.4 |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:43 pm
|
|
Replies: 83
Views: 14351
|
| QUOTEI think it's more the case that the Salamander Company is quite overpriced. Trust me, from my playtests I've found that Thunderers especially are pretty rubbish. Although they only have one role it is one that is fairly easy to get the most out of. I agree that the salamanders are overpriced b... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard Topic: Armoured Regiment 1.4 |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:22 pm
|
|
Replies: 83
Views: 14351
|
| Hi there. I have to say that both the thunderer and the demolisher still seem a little underpriced especially when compared to the salamander company. The conquerer also still needs something other than 5cm movement on a regular russ. I don't like the idea of the increased flexibility of sponson opt... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard Topic: Imperial Guard Armoured Regiment V1.3 |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 7:02 pm
|
|
Replies: 137
Views: 25737
|
| Oh and I really like the look of the stormhammer as close support super heavy. Maybe gone a bit far with the background justification. I'm just picturing the crew of the stormhammer sneaking around the armoury at night grabbing whatever they can carry and and running off. There would be some set of ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard Topic: Imperial Guard Armoured Regiment V1.3 |
| Moose Cloud |
|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:55 pm
|
|
Replies: 137
Views: 25737
|
| At a glance: The executioner is missing reinforced armour. Is this deliberate? I quite like the destroyer and don't feel that it is overpowered for the simple reason that it is hard to find a formation for it. It's range and sniper ability may be a bit wasted in a tank co and will drive the price up... |
|
|
| Sort by: |