| Author |
Message |
Forum: Wargames Trades Topic: I always reckon this sort of thing is nicked. |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:13 am
|
|
Replies: 12
Views: 3013
|
It's suprisingly common for carry cases to be stolen from GW stores in England. People walk in and out of stores with them and people are always distracted. Stores are often crowded as well. It's a shame.
However I agree that this porbbly isn't stolen. |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Reviewing Spirit Stones |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:33 pm
|
|
Replies: 211
Views: 44345
|
| Seems like the obvious solution then. If you make sure you describe them in combination with a basic infinity circuit it'll make sense to people for whom fluff is important. I realise this is for the GT list but most the casual players I know use the GT scenario anyway. However what are ... |
|
|
Forum: 6mm (and 8mm) Topic: CONVERSION: Finished Grotnoughts! |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:08 pm
|
|
Replies: 28
Views: 6993
|
They are amazing and, I have to agree with everyone else, cute.
How did you make them, I want to convert my own stompas and these look like a pretty good basis. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Reviewing Spirit Stones |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:55 pm
|
|
Replies: 211
Views: 44345
|
| Quote (semajnollissor @ 15 Mar. 2006 (15:59))Well, I'm somewhat agnostic on whether the EoVs should get the ability - I'm on the fence. However, you could probably justify EoV's not having the ability by saying that its effects are rolled up into the existing rules for WE - i.e. they don't get suppr... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Reviewing Spirit Stones |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:49 pm
|
|
Replies: 211
Views: 44345
|
| Quote (semajnollissor @ 15 Mar. 2006 (15:32))Quote (VanDamneg @ 15 Mar. 2006 (09:20))Also am I correct in thinking it's mainly the small vehicle formations that need the BM removal? Yes, but thats all Eldar vehicle [LV/AV] formations, since all eldar vehicle formations are small. Ok that seems like ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Reviewing Spirit Stones |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:20 pm
|
|
Replies: 211
Views: 44345
|
| Quote (Tactica @ 15 Mar. 2006 (14:56))Quote (Chroma @ 15 Mar. 2006 (08:13))Quote (VanDamneg @ 15 Mar. 2006 (13:52))I think to a lot of people it's important that the solution not only works but makes sense to the background. ?Therefore leaving the rule called spirit stones but restricting to vehicle... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Reviewing Spirit Stones |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 2:52 pm
|
|
Replies: 211
Views: 44345
|
| I think to a lot of people it's important that the solution not only works but makes sense to the background. Therefore leaving the rule called spirit stones but restricting to vehicles say would seem wrong (If anything infantry have more use for spirit stones in the background as there are mo... |
|
|
Forum: 6mm (and 8mm) Topic: Converting Fireprisms |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 9:03 pm
|
|
Replies: 3
Views: 1173
|
| Being slightly insane I have decided I want to convert my own fireprism models from the FW falcons. This is mainly because the SG fireprisms gun looks too big plus the FW falcon is such a nice model. Anyway I was looking for advice on how to do so. I was thinking that I would build the m... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Tired of Arguement |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:42 pm
|
|
Replies: 48
Views: 9565
|
| Quote (Tactica @ 14 Mar. 2006 (16:18))Gentlemen, I fully agree with NH and some others that Ulthwe's problems do not solely lie on the shoulders of the Biel-tan list - however, many of the problems do lie there. As the Ulthwe is a derivitave of BT - one must start there. More latere... I also fully ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Reviewing Spirit Stones |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 12:31 pm
|
|
Replies: 211
Views: 44345
|
| Quote (The_Real_Chris @ 14 Mar. 2006 (06:04))Incidentally as a quick simple fix, inelagent as it might be, whats wrong with the straight 10% point increase? This seems to make most sense though I feel that some units (maybe the fireprism) shouldn't be increased in points. On a rather different... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Tired of Arguement |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:40 pm
|
|
Replies: 48
Views: 9565
|
| Quote (Chroma @ 13 Mar. 2006 (19:33))Quote (VanDamneg @ 13 Mar. 2006 (19:10))Earlier in the thread someone suggested you could tie SR 5 into the Seer Council (very much like the farsight ability on all farseers). ? What do people think? Well, tying SR to a unit makes for some, certainly lessens the ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Reviewing Spirit Stones |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:16 pm
|
|
Replies: 211
Views: 44345
|
| Quote (Chroma @ 13 Mar. 2006 (18:55))Quote (semajnollissor @ 13 Mar. 2006 (17:44))So, right about now I feel like Dr Watson just before Holmes points out some obvious flaw in his reasoning, so what say you, Sherlocks? My response is that, essentially, the core complaint about Spirit Stones, coming f... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: Firewarriors vs Pathfinders |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:14 pm
|
|
Replies: 110
Views: 11838
|
| The more I think about it the less I think things should be changed. I wouldn't mind seeing FW get 2 pulse rifles instead of their pulse carbines but I can see that PF are basically ok. However I'd still question whether they need (or should have) disrupt on their rail rifles (I know th... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Tired of Arguement |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:10 pm
|
|
Replies: 48
Views: 9565
|
| Earlier in the thread someone suggested you could tie SR 5 into the Seer Council (very much like the farsight ability on all farseers). To me this seems like a good idea to me though it probably warrants a points increase for the Seer Council and maybe also a power decrease (do they really des... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Reviewing Spirit Stones |
| VanDamneg |
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 5:46 pm
|
|
Replies: 211
Views: 44345
|
| Quote (semajnollissor @ 13 Mar. 2006 (16:38))Well, the thing is, then only guardian hosts would benefit from the change, and they don't really need it as much as, say, a falcon troupe might. And, I agree, Ulthwe would need considerable revising, but nothing that can't be handled with point adjustmen... |
|
|
| Sort by: |