Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Search found 5476 matches
Search these results:

Author Message

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Planetfall question

 Post subject: Re: Planetfall question
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2022 2:14 pm 

Replies: 11
Views: 1170


I don't think it ever made it to a FAQ, but there was talk about it 10 years ago: https://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?p=444872#p444872 Well according to Neal’s post in that thread , he did present a FAQ that was framed in response to this general question, while answering the spec...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Recycling Air Assaults

 Post subject: Re: Recycling Air Assaults
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2021 5:46 pm 

Replies: 19
Views: 3552


And this risk to the embarked formation is why this tactic is performed at the end of a turn . . .

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Recycling Air Assaults

 Post subject: Re: Recycling Air Assaults
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2021 2:38 am 

Replies: 19
Views: 3552


FWIW, this all resulted from “the eternal air assault” way back when E:A had just been produced. Originally the THawk and Terminators landed, assaulted, and then the Termies consolidated back into the THawk to rinse and repeat the following turn - much too powerful. So, this ruling was created immed...

 Forum: 6mm (and 8mm)   Topic: Adeptus Titanicus - Titan bases for Epic

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2021 9:08 pm 

Replies: 4
Views: 860


An alternative, if somewhat time-consuming approach, is to use earth magnets to attach some small parts of the titan equivalent to the number of shields.

 Forum: NetEA Eldar   Topic: new Eldar AC

 Post subject: Re: new Eldar AC
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2021 11:38 pm 

Replies: 10
Views: 2555


Good to hear, well deserved.

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: NetEA Tournament Pack

 Post subject: Re: NetEA Tournament Pack
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2021 12:02 am 

Replies: 180
Views: 111625


FWIW Dave (having not played for years), I have a similar recollection to yours from way back. ⋅ In the simple case, defending ground units fire on attacking aircraft making a ground attack before the ground attack takes place. These ‘flak attacks’ are made if the enemy a/c have passed wit...

 Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups   Topic: EUK Counterattack - Bristol - ***5th September***

Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2020 10:23 pm 

Replies: 23
Views: 10936


My club (CLWC) has been meeting back at the Escape in central London for several weeks, but under severely restricted circumstances. Whilst things may still change, I suggest that the new ‘rules’ will still impact, and so may modify the number of tables and hence the maximum number of players. You m...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Thunderhawk Gunships how they work for

Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 1:03 pm 

Replies: 16
Views: 3641


I may be mis-remembering the master FAQ and various conversations around 2012. Part of the problem at the time was that this particular FAQ was put in 3.3 war engine assaults, which made it hard to find. Either way, we agree you need a second transport to pick up the victors, and the “pickup” transp...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Thunderhawk Gunships how they work for

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:56 am 

Replies: 16
Views: 3641


So you could activate or withdraw a unit onto a landed THawk, or even consolidate onto a different THawk, and all THawks would be able to disengage that turn. i don’t think this interpretation is right Dave. Consolidation prevents any transport from disengaging, irrespective of whether the assault ...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Thunderhawk Gunships how they work for

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:44 am 

Replies: 16
Views: 3641


Hi Deb, this question confused me too when I started way back. The “consolidation errata” to 4.2.5 was added to stop the marine player from using a single transport to fly in, dismounting troops to assault a target, consolidating the troops back onto the transport and disengaging to repeat the same ...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Should aircraft contest when landing?

Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 4:02 am 

Replies: 27
Views: 13610


Have you tried Richardl’s alternative scoring system? It is similar to your suggestion. I believe it may have been used for one game per tournament in the UK to mitigate this exact dilemma, but without nerfing particular armies too greatly.

 Forum: Wargames Trades   Topic: Selling my Collection

 Post subject: Re: Selling my Collection
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:43 am 

Replies: 46
Views: 27649


Could you post links to the EBay items.

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: FAQ update

 Post subject: Re: FAQ update
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2019 10:34 am 

Replies: 17
Views: 9122


As I recall, there was a discussion over whether the formation needed to activate each turn. The answer was “no”, it didn’t need to activate to remain on OW, but would need to activate if it needed to do something different during the following turn. However it seems that the E-UK committee agreed w...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Should aircraft contest when landing?

Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2019 2:25 am 

Replies: 27
Views: 13610


Reducing A/c to contesting rather than capturing an objective when they land was introduced years ago to answer this particular dilemma. It diminishes the potential impact that A/c have on the game, and has been deemed adequate for a long time when compared to similar strategies like a single unit c...

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: FAQ update

 Post subject: Re: FAQ update
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2019 1:53 am 

Replies: 17
Views: 9122


Neal has already ruled on this in the 2012 FAQ; Section 1.10: Overwatch Q: Can a unit remain on Overwatch into a following turn? A: If the Formation hasn't fired by the end of the turn, then they can remain on Overwatch into the following turn. Note, in order to achieve this the formation effectivel...
Sort by:  
Page 1 of 366 [ Search found 5476 matches ]



Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net