| Author |
Message |
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Fir Iolarion Eldar Titan Clan List 2.2 |
| CTYankee |
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2015 11:12 pm
|
|
Replies: 169
Views: 68229
|
OK, but if we are just going to clone the Imperial list, then what is the point? Can't we be more creative than that?
Jon |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Fir Iolarion Eldar Titan Clan List 2.2 |
| CTYankee |
|
Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2015 11:22 am
|
|
Replies: 169
Views: 68229
|
| I don't necessarily disagree,and I'm not against them being added, but, playing devil's advocate here, isn't that what the Allied formations are for? |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Fir Iolarion Eldar Titan Clan List 2.2 |
| CTYankee |
|
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:28 pm
|
|
Replies: 169
Views: 68229
|
| Knights would indeed be cool. But do they really fit "fluff-wise"? They are supposedly Exodite constructs. Would a Titan craftworld really want to bother with them? |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Dark Eldar Vampire Transport |
| CTYankee |
|
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 8:43 pm
|
|
Replies: 8
Views: 4539
|
| I think venoms are cool, and they are very much in tune with the way DE operate. I'd like to see them included. Metal Eldar Viper models work perfectly for these. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Fir Iolarion Eldar Titan Clan List 2.2 |
| CTYankee |
|
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 9:59 am
|
|
Replies: 169
Views: 68229
|
mordoten wrote: Well, then that could be solved by splitting them into battle titans and scout titans like in the AMTL list. At least 1 battle titan choice must be raken.
Yes, that would work. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Fir Iolarion Eldar Titan Clan List 2.2 |
| CTYankee |
|
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 11:14 pm
|
|
Replies: 169
Views: 68229
|
| Or just add a 1+ to Warlocks or Phantoms... But that might be to easy of a sollution. Plus you might lose people with that approach. I like Phantoms but have no interest in playing Warlocks. So, if the list was 1+ for Warlocks I'd move on to other lists right away. But maybe I am alone in that way ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Fir Iolarion Eldar Titan Clan List 2.2 |
| CTYankee |
|
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 10:19 am
|
|
Replies: 169
Views: 68229
|
| Upon thinking about this further, the 2+ Initiative for Revenants would work OK if this was a standalone list, but begs the question of why Revenants are 1+ on every other list but 2+ on this Titan only list. I'm not familiar with the fluff for this list, if there even is any, but there could be sev... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Fir Iolarion Eldar Titan Clan List 2.2 |
| CTYankee |
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2014 3:12 pm
|
|
Replies: 169
Views: 68229
|
| Gaming in Congo - a divergence. Actually,I am in Cape Town right now on holiday - and before people think I have no life at all, I'm just killing time right now (on Christmas day) while I am waiting for my wife to get ready to go out, and my son is asleep. But I currently live in work in the Congo. ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Fir Iolarion Eldar Titan Clan List 2.2 |
| CTYankee |
|
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:48 pm
|
|
Replies: 169
Views: 68229
|
| Winning with a list that can't be beaten is no win at all. That kind of behavior is for children. I'd rather change the people I game with, who are, in fact, adults and do not succumb to BS spam lists, than nerf a perfectly good, fun list. If "tournament" players do not play this way, well... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Fir Iolarion Eldar Titan Clan List 2.2 |
| CTYankee |
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:50 pm
|
|
Replies: 169
Views: 68229
|
| Just because a formation can be "spammed" is not a reason to change it. Spam is for assholes - whom I do encounter as I do not, apparently with great fortune, do not encounter. Revenants are fun as is and , gee whiz, this is a game. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard Topic: For Elysia! The Elysian Drop Troop Regiment v3.x |
| CTYankee |
|
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:32 pm
|
|
Replies: 412
Views: 253920
|
| I've not actually tried this army yet, but think it looks like fun. Re; the thought that Drop Troop Companies are to fragile, perhaps it would be appropriate (and within the fluff, or at least the intent thereof) to allow them to be on overwatch as soon as they "teleport" in. Regardless of... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: White Scars v2012 |
| CTYankee |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2014 11:09 pm
|
|
Replies: 30
Views: 14977
|
| Two things - first of all, I HATE the idea of having 4 unit bike formations for WS. "Withdraw then return" does not mean Break then try to rally - it means hit 'em, move to somewhere safe, then hit 'em again;which I think is pretty well represented in the existing list. So, stay with the e... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: AdMech Dev Status September 2014 |
| CTYankee |
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:19 am
|
|
Replies: 16
Views: 8639
|
| It's rated FB because it's primary mission is CAS and FB makes it less maneuverable on ground attack missions to represent that aspect. Has nothing to do with whether or not it has bombs and rockets, though ostensibly the same logic applies since the primary cannon needs to draw a bead on the targe... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: AdMech Dev Status September 2014 |
| CTYankee |
|
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:27 pm
|
|
Replies: 16
Views: 8639
|
| Hello - returning to EA after a LONG hiatus and am happy to see there is still such active interest in the game. I like this ATML list a lot and plan to try out the Skitarii version this weekend. Quick questions and an observation. Q: Since the Avenger Strike Fighter carries no ordnance (i.e., it is... |
|
|
| Sort by: |