| Author |
Message |
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Storm Raven Unit Discussion |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 8:55 am
|
|
Replies: 35
Views: 15493
|
| Hi! I like the two type idea. How about the "transport" SR type as upgrade only for infantry, And the "gunship" type as individual formation (and maybe as upgrade for some formation)? The missile is good, but it's realy should have 60 cm range. However I completly fine with the c... |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Please welcome the new Sub-AC for the Ulthwé Craftworld… |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 9:59 pm
|
|
Replies: 11
Views: 5714
|
Good luck! 
For the sake of the edar race... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: The NetEA Codex list. How do you feel about it? A few Qs |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 12:30 pm
|
|
Replies: 266
Views: 71938
|
| I also support the hunter price drop some way. A bit more options, like 1-2 hunter for more formations (especialy for devastators). Also to do something with the whirlwinds. A little more range, or maybe giving the ignore cover ability (40k -> whirlwhind incendiary missiles), or just a simple price ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Blood Angels List Development Thread |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 12:12 am
|
|
Replies: 423
Views: 129770
|
Supreme commander missing "leader" ability.
Storm Raven missiles should be named "stormstrike missiles" instead of "bloodstrike". |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Blood Angels List Development Thread |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 11:47 pm
|
|
Replies: 423
Views: 129770
|
pati wrote: in the Codex list they will lower the price of the Land Speeder Typhoons!
Oh, yes!
Dobbsy wrote: Amendment of the Typhoons upgrade to:
Replace any number of Land Speeders with an equal number of
Land Speeder Typhoons
Add up to 2 +25points
Add 3 to 5 +50 points
Every one waited for this! |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: AMTL 3.23.1 (Approved) |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:42 pm
|
|
Replies: 209
Views: 51703
|
| Done with the read back of this topic. :) I see there is some lenghty talk about plasma destructor. I partyally know the old Titanicus fluff. My idea about weapon classes: Warhound: light titan weapons Reaver: light and medium titan weapons Warlord: medium and Warlord class titan weapons Light Titan... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: AMTL 3.23.1 (Approved) |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 9:37 pm
|
|
Replies: 209
Views: 51703
|
Just a question.
I used the 2014 compendium lists.
I reading now this 3.23.1 titan list version, and not sure about landing pad:
it's lost the ability to give indirect fire to BP weapons?? |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Amendments to the Codex list |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 9:38 pm
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 9879
|
|
|
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: Questions: The Demolisher Cannon |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 9:12 pm
|
|
Replies: 55
Views: 21785
|
| Distrupt, and IC even in FF sounds the most acceptable for me (from the three version of change) as usefulness. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: The NetEA Codex list. How do you feel about it? A few Qs |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 12:25 pm
|
|
Replies: 266
Views: 71938
|
| I hope we all understand / agree that 40K stats do not always convert easily into E:A, mainly due to the coarser E:A mechanics. Of course. :) Note, there is a striking parallel with the Eldar Cobra which effectively has the same issue; a slow unit with short ranged very powerfull weapon, but the un... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: The NetEA Codex list. How do you feel about it? A few Qs |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2014 9:33 pm
|
|
Replies: 266
Views: 71938
|
| Not I want it. What is a weapon's stat even in epic, should follow to a reasonable degree what that weapon can do in "big brother" 40k. The Tau Railgun, at Str 10 AP1, is held up as the premier tank killer, yet is only AT4+ in epic. Thats terrible for the railgun. :( And it was* not good ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: The NetEA Codex list. How do you feel about it? A few Qs |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2014 4:20 pm
|
|
Replies: 266
Views: 71938
|
| Vindicator: The demolisher cannon IS a macro weapon. No, the Demolisher cannon is (at best) on the borderline between what should be a macroweapon attack and what shouldn't. And why some of you think that? Why bother the only single marine MW weapon, which is rightfully theirs? It's not a macroweap... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: The NetEA Codex list. How do you feel about it? A few Qs |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2014 3:34 pm
|
|
Replies: 266
Views: 71938
|
carlos wrote: You realise stuff like ATSKNF, initiative 1+ instead of 2+ and the overall context of the army costs points too, right?
Yes I am, and still stands solid.
Almost no one use whirlwhinds.
And hunters, insted they take airplanes for AA defence... marines with airplanes. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: The NetEA Codex list. How do you feel about it? A few Qs |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2014 3:22 pm
|
|
Replies: 266
Views: 71938
|
| Eldar a single formation of Nightspinners is weak and easily broken / destroyed. Multiple Night Spinners are much more potent and scare a lot of people (I think I am the only person to field five formations to date . . .) Excuse me, no offense.. but no wonder why. Night Spinner - AV, 35 cm, 5+, 6+,... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Blood Angels List Development Thread |
| JuronValor |
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2014 12:09 pm
|
|
Replies: 423
Views: 129770
|
| However, I understand you reluctant to change anything, as the new compendium is here soon, and priority to get the list approved in it. :) Maybe I will come back with these thoughts - like the DC one - after that. And a little remark. Wloud be good to change some colour in the list, because hard to... |
|
|
| Sort by: |