Tactical Command

Search found 3 matches
	Search these results:

Author

Message

Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: supporting fire

LightbulbUK

Post subject: Re: supporting fire

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:20 pm

Replies: 31
Views: 6302

Well, yes of course its nitpicky. But the point of an FAQ to make the rules clear. Poorly worded FAQ's don't really help. If someone has to say "oh that's covered by this other rule in the book" you know its not as clear as it could be. Since the cost of changing it is basically nothing wh...

Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: supporting fire

LightbulbUK

Post subject: Re: supporting fire

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 8:50 am

Replies: 31
Views: 6302

Thanks. I used to play this game a lot back when it was first released (and posted a lot on the original forum) thinking about starting to play again, just trying to get a feel for what rules have changed. :) Its a bit unclear as worded though so I'd rephrase it if it went back into the document - t...

Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: supporting fire

LightbulbUK

Post subject: Re: supporting fire

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:57 am

Replies: 31
Views: 6302

So if you engage an enemy formation which only has close combat units in a firefight - and all of your units are within range of all of the enemies you cannot use any supporting fire because the defenders aren't in a position to attack?

That seems... ...oddly worded. Was that really the intention?

Sort by:

Page 1 of 1 [ Search found 3 matches ]

Jump to: