| Author |
Message |
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Cobra SHT |
| Dirty Boots |
|
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:20 am
|
|
Replies: 180
Views: 53739
|
| 650 pt for 3 would be the right and the fair cost IMHO |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Cobra SHT |
| Dirty Boots |
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:53 pm
|
|
Replies: 180
Views: 53739
|
| One point according to your point of view. However, if they are separated it did not have the same psychologic impact if they were function in the same formation. But where this is essentially play is when the composition of the list. Have to play them separately asked to hold more choices available... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Cobra SHT |
| Dirty Boots |
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:07 pm
|
|
Replies: 180
Views: 53739
|
| We will not take into account the assumptions of possible sequences of play imagining the reaction of the opponent. This is the best way to err in balancing unit. Potentially a pair of Cobra at 3PB each, it's one extra BM to be under fire, that makes it already a little rascal. This is what I think ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Cobra SHT |
| Dirty Boots |
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 12:28 pm
|
|
Replies: 180
Views: 53739
|
| Why not but in this case it should be prohibited from playing in pairs. To be too powerful in my opinion. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Cobra SHT |
| Dirty Boots |
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:47 am
|
|
Replies: 180
Views: 53739
|
| I flood myself... And if all simply the profile Cobra remained as such in giving it ignores covered without restriction and allow the use of single column of the table AP barrage? Because at the time of this charter for MA PB weapons, the unit was acceptable. Allowing it to touch on 5+ solo, 4+ in p... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: List of proposed changes for the Eldar Biel-Tan List |
| Dirty Boots |
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 12:52 am
|
|
Replies: 135
Views: 28788
|
| @DirtyBoots: I am unconvinced with your Pulsar mod. And TK on the Scorpion feels really weird. It avoids this kind of idea to lower the cost of Scorpion. And that from my point of view this is something that I feel weird. It would be more appropriate to work on the profile without affecting the cos... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: List of proposed changes for the Eldar Biel-Tan List |
| Dirty Boots |
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:43 pm
|
|
Replies: 135
Views: 28788
|
In my personal list I included the rule stone spirit as a free general capacity for all the army. During the end phase, a roll of 6 for any rally test, remove 1 additional blast marker to the formation.
It's work perfectly IMO.
If that could help. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: List of proposed changes for the Eldar Biel-Tan List |
| Dirty Boots |
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 3:39 pm
|
|
Replies: 135
Views: 28788
|
| Thx for the link but i already posted in this topic. To finish with this off the topic, the Cobra was properly playable at the time of the Charter of PB MA. At 250pts each, there is no risk to make the Scorpion a popcorn unit. I don't think so, they have already played with regularly without the nee... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: List of proposed changes for the Eldar Biel-Tan List |
| Dirty Boots |
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 3:10 pm
|
|
Replies: 135
Views: 28788
|
| Fluff says that Scorpions are tank killers. The war engine killer role is left to the Cobra. So Scorpions shouldn't get TK ability. 3xMW2+ might be to much. 3xMW3+ or/and! 75cm range suites me. This does nothing disrupts the fluff, some tanks are war engines. Then i'is only a point of view that tak... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: List of proposed changes for the Eldar Biel-Tan List |
| Dirty Boots |
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:44 pm
|
|
Replies: 135
Views: 28788
|
| What you think about a SHT Scorpion with 60cm 2 x MA3+ TK (1) and replace the pulsar phantom weapon to 75cm 3 x MA3+. Note in our list the Fire prism got a 60cm AP4+/ AC3+ Lance. We considered that AC2 + it was too easy to make a double movement still having the opportunity to hit on a 3 + lance. Th... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Revenant Pulsars |
| Dirty Boots |
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 8:14 pm
|
|
Replies: 12
Views: 4110
|
| Hello, 1st, sorry for the necromancy trick. I briefly introduced myself on the topic talking about the titan pulsars. I am thinking about a change in the armament of revenants titan (cause in F-ERC list, we played it with the MA4+ to hit). Since the increase of the score required to hit and the tran... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Cobra SHT |
| Dirty Boots |
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:53 pm
|
|
Replies: 180
Views: 53739
|
| Hi, for about the same arguments here, I personally changed the profile of the Cobra restoring ignore cover without restriction (this is still a D-Canon jesus!) and increasing his range to 45cm instead of 30cm. This always leaves quite tricky to play but so much more interesting and playable ! I bri... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Phantom Titan Pulsars |
| Dirty Boots |
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:32 pm
|
|
Replies: 23
Views: 7412
|
| Hi, i'm not really new on the board but when the TC switch for an another server i lost my id and can't recover it. Well, i'm the frenchy who's initiate the modifications of the pulsar between the phantom and the SHT Scorpion. We give the TK(1) ability to the scorpion with a rate to hit of 3+ and we... |
|
|
| Sort by: |