| Author |
Message |
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: LatD - Units |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:34 pm
|
|
Replies: 74
Views: 16855
|
| The one reason that I have yet to include them in a list is because you get only four of them - they seem utterly incapable of assaulting something and succeeding often enough to be worth it. |
|
 |
Forum: EA Battle Reports Topic: Borkas Tau adventures [report added 1st sept] |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:31 pm
|
|
Replies: 15
Views: 6395
|
| That might be the Forge World BFG cruiser you're looking at, standing in as Tiger Shark. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: LatD - Units |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:11 am
|
|
Replies: 74
Views: 16855
|
| Well, the reason I have yet to try out the assault engines is because, well, there seems to be a little to few of them to actually assault something...! |
|
|
Forum: EA Battle Reports Topic: Vraks campaign, Battle for the eastern door |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:52 pm
|
|
Replies: 23
Views: 8554
|
| Ehum... is it just me who lacks, maybe, some information on how the battle went? Who won? |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Squats Topic: New Squat List: Thurgrimm Stronghold 1.0 |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 9:34 am
|
|
Replies: 137
Views: 40257
|
| Played a game vs the Squats yesterday, and we made the following observations: *Thunderers are very, very shooty, and priced so that the warrior brotherhood with two thunderer upgrades became the BTS. I would drop their price to 100pts/4 and remove the missile launcher. *At no point did the 10cm mov... |
|
|
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: +1 AA on Intercept. Is it needed? |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:27 pm
|
|
Replies: 37
Views: 10554
|
| Well, presumably, if said rule was to be adopted, there would be less need to boost interceptor AA beyond 5+, as with the SM interceptor. |
|
|
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: +1 AA on Intercept. Is it needed? |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:43 pm
|
|
Replies: 37
Views: 10554
|
| I would keep both rules, but change it so that intercept fires *before* defensive flyer AA. |
|
|
Forum: 6mm (and 8mm) Topic: How do you paint your minis without a base |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:42 pm
|
|
Replies: 4
Views: 1540
|
| Glue +nail + mini + styrofoam |
|
|
Forum: EA Strategy, Tactics and Army Lists Topic: Attacker options for the "Assault" scenario |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 1:26 pm
|
|
Replies: 3
Views: 2342
|
| We've now played three assaults; LatD > Orks (LatD win), Orks > LatD (Orks win), Vraks > SM (draw) and are thinking further on tweaking the scenario with more defender and attacker options, and perhaps some more goals for both sides. Some observations: We're running the minefields as per the siegeli... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard Topic: Imperial Guard Objective Markers |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:58 am
|
|
Replies: 5
Views: 2887
|
| Remember that EA battles are regiment-sized engagements - they fight over bridges, crossroads, high/choke points, key facilities such as airfields, etc. |
|
|
Forum: General Modern Wargames Topic: Modern Spearhead |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:51 pm
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 9207
|
| I'm slowly assembling a division of early 80s soviets and (west) german heimatsschutz, but it takes time, it's my first large-scale modelling project. I have played quite a lot at conventions, though. |
|
|
Forum: General Modern Wargames Topic: Modern Spearhead |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 11:06 pm
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 9207
|
| Any MSH players out there? (Or just regular SH, for that matter) |
|
|
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: NetEA Tournament Pack 2012 - 2012/05/31 |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:52 pm
|
|
Replies: 65
Views: 20035
|
| I noticed, to my dismay, that the traitor units are not in the LATD reference sheet - if possible, please put them back...! |
|
|
Forum: EA Strategy, Tactics and Army Lists Topic: Attacker options for the "Assault" scenario |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 9:46 am
|
|
Replies: 3
Views: 2342
|
| Not that I can find? I searched all documents of the rulebook for "minefield" but came up empty. The "Siegeline" Fanatic article has some sort of minefields, but I'm not sure they're supposed to be the same, and doesn't mention anti-personell/anti-vehicle either. |
|
|
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: NetEA Tournament Pack 2012 - 2012/05/31 |
| Profit |
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:48 pm
|
|
Replies: 65
Views: 20035
|
| I noticed a difference between this LATD list and the one in the compendium - in this one you're allowed two support formations per coven, in the other only one. Which is correct? |
|
|
| Sort by: |