| Author |
Message |
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: LMRL, BML & VM |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:31 am
|
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4059
|
| NOVAGUARD> Changes to the LMRL won't affect the main weapon - this is part of the reason why the slightly clumsy "Light" designation is in use, as it splits the Warhound weapons away from the Battle Titan weapons. |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: LMRL, BML & VM |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:17 am
|
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4059
|
| These seem to be some of the more problematic weapons in the AMTL over the 3 versions - the Light Multiple Rocket Launcher, the Barrage Missile and the Vortex Missile. They've also been the ones that I've left alone the most, so I think its time we took a look at them. Light Multiple Rocket Launcher... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Separate Lists? |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:26 pm
|
|
Replies: 69
Views: 13973
|
| Dysartes was absent for so long for a selection of reasons. 1, Helping design/write background for another game Command Horizon 2, Forgetting his sign-in information, combined with the board moving. 3, RL concerns. 4, The lack of anything happening last time I looked in (late September), and especia... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: The Ordinatii - Discussion |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:33 am
|
|
Replies: 1
Views: 856
|
| As I set out in my aims for this version of the list, one of the groups of units I was hoping to look at were the Ordinatii. So, for those of you who've used them, a few questions: 1, Are they too expensive, too cheap, or just right? 2, Is the upgrade process clear enough? 3, How have you gotten on ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Update Please |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:11 am
|
|
Replies: 4
Views: 1285
|
| CAL, I don't think anyone will have any problems with you using the list as a basis for a Chaos Titan Legion - there are a number mentioned in the old background, after all. With regards Chaos Titan weaponry, I haven't done write-ups for them in the Collector's Models section as this is an Imperial ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Flame template weapons |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:59 am
|
|
Replies: 38
Views: 5108
|
| I don't think it'd be too good, Hena - bear in mind the LIG is an AT6+ weapon, and most of the time a Warhound is likely to be moving on the double, needing a 7+ to hit. That makes the change to step 3 as follows: "If a stand is covered by more than one template, it still only takes one hit in total... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Flame template weapons |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 8:47 pm
|
|
Replies: 38
Views: 5108
|
| The intention is for each unit to be hit once - though I'm tempted by multiple hits on WE's, it'd be tricky to word intuitively. I think the best place to clarify would be in step 3, by adding the following to the end: "If a stand is covered by more than one template, it still only takes one hit in ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tyranids Topic: Non-PDF v7.0 List |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:19 am
|
|
Replies: 22
Views: 5388
|
Minor point on the flame templte rules, Jaldon - it might be an idea to put "flame" or "Flamer" in the title of that rules section, just to be on the safe side  |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Question regarding knights |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:14 pm
|
|
Replies: 8
Views: 2551
|
| tneva - as previously stated, all the Knights (bar the Wardens) feature in the army list. The Wardens are in the Collector's Models section, and I believe count as Leman Russ MBTs. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: [BatRep] Tau vs Imperial Guard - 3000 |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:18 pm
|
|
Replies: 4
Views: 1199
|
Rats, beaten to the punch.
Anyone else spot the problem with the IG vs FW Engage in turn 2, btw? |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Reviewing Spirit Stones |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 11:10 am
|
|
Replies: 211
Views: 40389
|
| Someone (Tactica?) said earlier I hadn't made a clear position on Spirit Stones, so here goes. 1, I dislike the current rule for 3 reasons. 1, Feel. 2, Effect. 3, It being bolted on late in development with (according to Jaldon & co) little testing to see what would happen. 2, I do feel that the sma... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tyranids Topic: Vault and fixes? |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:38 pm
|
|
Replies: 32
Views: 5603
|
| Jaldon/Hena - I don't suppose one of you could update me with what y'all are planning with the flame template rules-wise, could you? |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: Can someone illuminate me |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:29 pm
|
|
Replies: 9
Views: 2492
|
Tactica, as I understand the AC rules for 40k, each Tank Ace or HQ slot opens 2 Troops choices - but there's nothing stopping you taking more than you need for your troops selections  |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: V4.4 - Scorpionfish and Dragonfish |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:57 pm
|
|
Replies: 192
Views: 31480
|
| Out of interest, CS, why don't we have the option to change the name? It's not like there's an official model out there, nor (to my knowledge) was it mentioned in IA3 - what's stopping us changing the name? |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: V4.4 - Scorpionfish and Dragonfish |
| dysartes |
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 8:08 am
|
|
Replies: 192
Views: 31480
|
| Just remember to change the name to Arrowtooth before you do |
|
|
| Sort by: |