| Author |
Message |
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Knightworld - Speed Change Ideas |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 12:20 pm
|
|
Replies: 30
Views: 4341
|
| I wouldn't have bothered with the baron as you are putting your supreme commander in a lot of danger slicking him with the Lancers. |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Knightworld - Speed Change Ideas |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 6:12 pm
|
|
Replies: 30
Views: 4341
|
| One of the reasons why I suggested infiltrate to begin with is that most cavalry already has infiltrate i.e rough riders. Lancers are essentially giant robots replicating the role of cavalry. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Knightworld - Speed Change Ideas |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 12:09 pm
|
|
Replies: 30
Views: 4341
|
| So you don't like a 40cm charge, but a 35cm charge caused by a new special rule is ok? |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: [BR] Knightworld 1.1 vs Chaos |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:42 pm
|
|
Replies: 19
Views: 3624
|
Errants were never that fast, I suggested Lancers get infiltrator and a 20cm move speed.
Errants are 30cm because of the attempt to make paladins the mid ranged knights, errants the close combat knights and lancers the firefight knights, which works in some ways but not in others. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Knightworld v1.1 |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:50 pm
|
|
Replies: 137
Views: 34657
|
| I don't think many people, if infact any, are going to feel like talking a unit of 9 knights, the current upgrade system for them feels a bit weird. Lancers still trump Errants due to Errants strange weapon loadout. The autocannon on the Paladins needs to be replaced with two heavy bolters, I think ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Knightworld - Knight Shield Options |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:32 pm
|
|
Replies: 22
Views: 4420
|
| I don't think you should be married to the current stats of 4+ reinforced armour, i think 5+ reinforced would allow a much better leeway in what you can do with the shields. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Knightworld - Knight Shield Options |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:12 pm
|
|
Replies: 22
Views: 4420
|
| 1) We could try that 2) Takes a lot of micromanaging which knights in a unit still have their shields and then positioning them to take the bulk of the fire. 3) Works at the moment, but not with the crossfire rule. 4) Not really feeling the cover modifier, it doesn’t seem ‘Imperial’ enough. 5) Could... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Knightworld - Core Formation Composition |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:03 pm
|
|
Replies: 11
Views: 3543
|
| The problem here is that metal knights are in 3's and obtaining a 4th would be tricky. I'd go for option 3 for now to make it easy for people who can do it either way. Best to have an army that fits in with what people currently have. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: New Knightworld Sub Champion |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 6:11 pm
|
|
Replies: 8
Views: 2540
|
| I look forward to the new list. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Land Raiders |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:28 pm
|
|
Replies: 229
Views: 50157
|
| To give the hornets nest of discussion on 2x4+ or 3x5+ a good whack do we want to take into consideration catching a defending unit in cover in a firefight. In which case 3x5+ gets 0.49% of a hit and 2x4+ 0.66%. I suggest we toss a coin for which one we use. Heads 2x4+, tails 3x5+, I'll let you know... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Current Space Marine Lists |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:11 pm
|
|
Replies: 39
Views: 12302
|
Excellent, nice work BlackLegion and Dobbsy, that has them all done except Imperial Fists.
To be honest I'm not sure how the Imperial Fists can diverge from the standard space marine list that much? |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: [Units] Attack Bikes |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:06 pm
|
|
Replies: 103
Views: 16336
|
| The numbers on a stand really shouldn't matter in this day an age anyway, there only seems to be a hard core following playing epic that i can see. It's not as if someone would complain about a stand not having enough models, if they were to say it wasn't legal I would probably ask 'legal for what'?... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Knightworld v1.03 list for critique |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 5:43 pm
|
|
Replies: 5
Views: 2316
|
Cheap activations, I'd recommend Thunderbolt fighters @ 150pts or Skitarri @ 300pts
Seneschals are currently great value, leader and inspiring alone is 50pts, get them while you can. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: [Units] Attack Bikes |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 5:28 pm
|
|
Replies: 103
Views: 16336
|
| As I see it, the most elegant solution is to simply make them mounted infantry. Yes, there is only one per stand, but since there are two "models" in the bike, I think that can squeeze through. This leaves the rest of the rules alone and doesn't mess with game balance nearly as much. This... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Current Space Marine Lists |
| Mc Haggis |
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 5:22 pm
|
|
Replies: 39
Views: 12302
|
| I have no idea how do do one of those so I managed to grab most of the links from looking at the forum, please feel free to tell me the links I've missed or if I have linked to an old version. Official GW Space Marine list: http://www.games-workshop.com/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m1320002_EPIC_updat... |
|
|
| Sort by: |