Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Search found 8 matches
Search these results:

Author Message

 Forum: NetEA Eldar   Topic: Various Eldar musings

 Post subject: Re: Various Eldar musings
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 9:39 am 

Replies: 52
Views: 11606


@zombocom You're confusing background and game stats here. And if you'd argue that way then Tau Firewarriors 5+ would also be very hard to justify. My arguments are the following: - their armour is not really different from "light" aspects - they are more numerous (see the argument why Dar...

 Forum: NetEA Eldar   Topic: Various Eldar musings

 Post subject: Re: Various Eldar musings
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:55 pm 

Replies: 52
Views: 11606


First thank you all for the comments and advise. It's much appreciated. In our next game we will try the following changes to the NetEA compendium beta list: - (Black) Guardians armour 5+ and +50pts - Falcons, Fire Prisms, Nightspinner Inv Save - Aircraft Initiative 1+ @matthemuppet I'm not sure abo...

 Forum: NetEA Eldar   Topic: Various Eldar musings

 Post subject: Re: Various Eldar musings
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 2:26 pm 

Replies: 52
Views: 11606


@Axel I'm using the NetEA draft. The 250pts for the Guardians was a mistake when I translated my excel sheet. They cost 300pts of course. And yeah, they are called Nightspinner troupe again. @mageboltrat This is not true for all craftworlds. There are also those who rely heavily on their Guardians l...

 Forum: NetEA Eldar   Topic: Various Eldar musings

 Post subject: Re: Various Eldar musings
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:59 am 

Replies: 52
Views: 11606


@Axel Sure, if you go by the 40K rules then they deserve no save at all (unless you count Conceal but most seem to be inclined to not do that). Not that their 40K rules make much sense IMO. It is true that the Ork 6+ save may not be much but they've got other rules and units to deal with that. Like ...

 Forum: NetEA Eldar   Topic: Various Eldar musings

 Post subject: Re: Various Eldar musings
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:25 pm 

Replies: 52
Views: 11606


First thank you for all the replies. I have to admit that my primary concern is a list that fits the background and only secondarily balance. I'm not saying that you can't have both of course. @mageboltrat But then SM don't have conceal. And their 4+ armour and TSKNF makes them quite resilient. I kn...

 Forum: NetEA Eldar   Topic: Various Eldar musings

 Post subject: Various Eldar musings
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:59 pm 

Replies: 52
Views: 11606


Hi, I'm pretty new to the game and I haven't much experience yet but I wanted to share some thoughts that are mostly based on background considerations and I'd like your oppinion on them. 1. Guardian armour Having the Guardians with no armour save at all rubs me completely the wrong way. The 5+ pape...

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: [NetEA] Army Compendium - DRAFT - Craftworld Eldar

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 1:30 pm 

Replies: 147
Views: 35189


The 33% limitation for titans and air/spacecraft as already been pointed as a typo IIRC. It should be 50%, right ? Currently correct, but I'm still thinking the Aerospace and Titans may need to be separated, as the intent isn't that Yme-Loc uses more aircraft than other Craftworlds, and, with the 5...

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: [NetEA] Army Compendium - DRAFT - Craftworld Eldar

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:58 am 

Replies: 147
Views: 35189


@Transport options Considering that this is supposed to be a compendium, IMO all possible options should be simply stated in the unit entry. Even those that are only present in some lists. You could set them in brackets to emphasize this experimental/non-standard status. Special rules for such thing...
Sort by:  
Page 1 of 1 [ Search found 8 matches ]



Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net