Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 3 of 3
  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Version 5.1 DRAFT
Honda
 Post subject: Version 5.1 DRAFT
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:56 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 11:44 pm
Posts: 1891
Location: Katy, Republic of Texas
Question: Can I ask what the rationale was behind removing them in 5.1? Personally, I would rather have the support group than the cadre, as if I want to take 4 Ion cannon tanks I now can't....


Well, I can assure you that it did not come down to a flip of a coin.  :cool:

After absorbing the peer review material, the decision was made to remove one of the HH cadre options. The support was removed because it presented the lowest risk to the list.

Although the core choice could have been removed just as easily, there are also consequences associated with potentially needing to evaluate the HH costs as they would now come with a premium of either FWs or Crisis.

As we were on a fairly tight deadline and evidence has not been presented yet that as a core choice, an imbalance exists, we went with leaving the core and not penalizing the gravheads.

_________________
Honda

"Remember Taros? We do"

- 23rd Elysian Drop Regiment
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Ginger
 Post subject: Version 5.1 DRAFT
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:38 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:20 pm
Posts: 5483
Location: London, UK
Did you consider the compromise position of having a formation of 5x HHeads for 325, and allowing single HH upgrades?

This really follows on from Neal's comments about the expense of certain upgrades and my thoughts on the 'popcorn' list.

_________________
"Play up and play the game"

Vitai lampada
Sir Hemry Newbolt
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Chroma
 Post subject: Version 5.1 DRAFT
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:45 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote: (Ginger @ 18 Mar. 2009, 12:38 )

Did you consider the compromise position of having a formation of 5x HHeads for 325, and allowing single HH upgrades?

Would it even be a consideration of having the AMHC be a base of four Hammerheads for 250 points, so then it can be upgraded to the usual six for the same cost as it is now?  

That way people with "four-strong" formations of Ionheads, or what-have-you, still have a playable formation... and doesn't penalize "gravheads" either.




_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Ginger
 Post subject: Version 5.1 DRAFT
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:00 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:20 pm
Posts: 5483
Location: London, UK
Chroma, I am less sure about this option, given the 'popcorn' potential and the way the list leans towards long-range fire-power (which was part of the reasoning behind 5x HH rather than 4x).

_________________
"Play up and play the game"

Vitai lampada
Sir Hemry Newbolt
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Chroma
 Post subject: Version 5.1 DRAFT
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:03 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote: (Ginger @ 18 Mar. 2009, 13:00 )

Chroma, I am less sure about this option, given the 'popcorn' potential and the way the list leans towards long-range fire-power (which was part of the reasoning behind 5x HH rather than 4x).

Well, that Tau list will *always* lean towards long-ranged fire power...

And the "4-strong" AMHC could always be 275 if that's really a concern.  And the Tau always have "popcorn potential"...

To me, starting at a base of four units seems an answer to the people who want all tanks *and* the people who would like a smaller Hammerhead formation... imagine that, two *different* groups of Tau players happy at the same time!  *LAUGH*




_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Moscovian
 Post subject: Version 5.1 DRAFT
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:11 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
Not to be a ninny but isn't this all Off-Topic for this thread?  There is a discussion thread out there and I think these are all good points, they just belong not-here.  Dropping a bunch of comments on the list here just makes it that much more likely that the real editing problems will be missed by CS and Honda and not make it onto 5.1.  Then we'll have 5.1.1.13.4.5.5.6.6 again which is really annoying.

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Chroma
 Post subject: Version 5.1 DRAFT
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:22 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote: (Moscovian @ 18 Mar. 2009, 13:11 )

Not to be a ninny but isn't this all Off-Topic for this thread?

Point taken and a new thread started about a smaller AMHC base formation.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Dobbsy
 Post subject: Version 5.1 DRAFT
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:05 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Not to be a ninny but isn't this all Off-Topic for this thread? There is a discussion thread out there

Well actually there was no discussion thread for 5.1.  :;):

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Moscovian
 Post subject: Version 5.1 DRAFT
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:10 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
Quote: (Dobbsy @ 18 Mar. 2009, 16:05 )

Not to be a ninny but isn't this all Off-Topic for this thread? There is a discussion thread out there

Well actually there was no discussion thread for 5.1.  :;):

There is now. :cool:   I was using my tachyon forum detector to read the existence of a future thread.  Oh, and it turns out that I am right about everything in case any of you are wondering.  :laugh:

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Honda
 Post subject: Version 5.1 DRAFT
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:59 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 11:44 pm
Posts: 1891
Location: Katy, Republic of Texas
The comment period for technical edits is closed. Recommended changes will be migrated to the final version.

Consider the list frozen.

_________________
Honda

"Remember Taros? We do"

- 23rd Elysian Drop Regiment
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 3 of 3
  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net